Comparative study of outcome of cataract surgery in diabetic and non-diabetic patients
Background: The present study compared Phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery. Materials & Methods: The present study was conducted on 64 patients of cataract of both genders. They were divided into 2 groups of 32 patients each. Group I were non- diabetic patients in which conventional extra capsular cataract surgery and small incision cataract surgery was performed on 32 patients each and group II comprised of diabetic patients in which both techniques were performed on 32 patients each. Following surgery, postoperatively patients were examined 1st day, after 2 weeks and 6 weeks. Complications in both groups were assessed. Results: In group I, CECC technique showed iridodialysis in 1 case, MSICS showed iris prolapse in 1 case, constricted pupil in 1 case and retained cortex in 1 case. In group II, iris prolapse was seen in 1 case, retained cortex in 1 case and PC rent in 1 case while, MSICS showed iridodialysis in 1 case, iris prolapse in 1 case, retained cortex in 1 case, PC rent in 1 case and vitreous loss in 1 case. The difference was significant (P< 0.05). Post- operative complications were iris prolapsed 1 in MSICS in group II, wound leak 1 in CECC in group I, II and MSICS 1 in group II, secondary glaucoma 1 in MSICS in group I and 2 in group II, posterior capsule opacity 1 in MSICS in group I and cystoids macular edema 1 in CECC and MSICS each in group II. The difference was significant (P< 0.05). Conclusion: Conventional extra capsular cataract extraction found to be effective as compared to manual small incision cataract surgery in non-diabetic than diabetics. Common complications were iris prolapsed, wound leak, secondary glaucoma, posterior capsule opacity and cystoids macular edema.