Comparative outcome of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in patient with portal hypertension
Background: Portal hypertension is commonly associated with hypersplenism, variceal bleeding, and massive splenomegaly. Splenectomy, with or without esophagogastric devascularization, remains a key surgical intervention. Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open splenectomy (OS). This study compares the outcomes of LS versus OS in patients with portal hypertension. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 80 patients with portal hypertension undergoing splenectomy, divided equally into LS (n=40) and OS (n=40) groups. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters, including operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, complications, hospital stay, and long-term outcomes (variceal recurrence, portal vein thrombosis, survival), were analyzed. Results: Mean operative time was longer in the LS group (165 ± 30 min vs 140 ± 25 min, p < 0.01), but intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (250 ± 80 mL vs 400 ± 120 mL, p < 0.001). Blood transfusions were required less frequently in LS (12.5% vs 30%, p = 0.04). Postoperative complications occurred in 15% of LS patients versus 35% in OS (p = 0.03), and hospital stay was shorter in LS (6.5 ± 1.8 vs 9.2 ± 2.4 days, p < 0.001). Long-term outcomes, including variceal recurrence (5% vs 10%, p = 0.40), portal vein thrombosis (2.5% vs 7.5%, p = 0.30), and overall survival (100% vs 97.5%, p = 0.31) were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: LS offers significant perioperative advantages over OS without compromising long-term outcomes in patients with portal hypertension. It should be considered the preferred surgical approach in suitable candidates, provided adequate laparoscopic expertise is available.