Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
127 Views
8 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 14 Issue: 4 (Jul-Aug, 2024) | Pages 850 - 854
A cadaveric study of brachial artery and its variations withanatomical perspectivein Central India.
 ,
 ,
1
Associate professor, Dept. of Anatomy, GMC, Chandrapur. India
2
Professor and Head, Dept. of Anatomy, GMC, Chandrapur. India
3
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Community medicine, GMC, Chandrapur. India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
July 10, 2024
Revised
July 28, 2024
Accepted
Aug. 5, 2024
Published
Aug. 30, 2024
Abstract

Introduction: It is believed that the great variability of this arterial pattern may be attributed to the failure of regression of some paths of embryonic arterial trunks. Anatomical knowledge of this principal artery and its variations has many clinical implications especially in surgeries relatedto orthopaedic and vascular re-constructive procedures. Hence a study was conducted in a tertiary medical college in Central Indiato study brachial artery and its variations with anatomical perspective Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted on 112 upper limbs of different age group and sex (38 Male and 18 Female) The brachial arteries were identified and branching pattern and relations of the brachial artery with brachial plexus in arm was observed and presence or absence of variations were documented. Results: Out of 112 upper limbs studies, 106 (94.5%) limbs showed normal morphological pattern of brachialartery, 6 (5.5%) limbs showed superficial brachial artery, 2 limb (1.5%) showed tortuous and SBA withtrifurcation into radial artery, ulnar artery and common interosseous artery in the cubital fossa. Conclusion: The study of Brachial artery and variation in its course and branching pattern is clinically important for surgeons, ortho-paedicians operating on the supracondylar fracture of humerus and radiologists performing angiographic studies on the upper limb.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Brachial artery, the most important artery of the arm,starts as a continuation of the axillary arteryon the distal border of the tendon of teresmajor muscle with the aid of accompanying the mediannerve, enters into cubital fossa. Under thecover of bicipital aponeurosis, it divides intoulnar and radial arteries anteromedial tothe neck of the radius. Common interosseousartery arises from the ulnar artery whichis again divided into front and backinterosseous arteries [1].

 

At first it is medial to the humerus, but gradually spirals in front of it until it lies medial

 

between the epicondyles of the humerus. Its pulsation is palpable at all times [2] and blood pressure and pulsed Doppler ultrasonographymeasurements are commonly evaluated throughdistal part of the brachial artery [3]. Conventional knowledge of brachial artery and theirbranches play a major role in blood vesselsoperations relating to these vessels. Literaturealong with various cadaveric and clinical studiessuggest that the brachial artery varies considerablyorigin, course and pattern of branching assuperficial brachial artery, tortuosity ortrifurcation into radial, ulnar and commoninterosseous arteries.

 

The superficial brachial artery (SBA) arisesfrom axillary artery and runs superficially to median nerve and may represent a superficial pulse [4]. The superficial course of thesearteries can be confused with veins anddangerous for venipuncture during intravenous procedures, injections, infusions andblood discharge [5]. and may lead to intra-arterial injections or ligation instead of a veinin the elbow socket [6]. That too can have consequencescatastrophic conditions such as gangrene or losshand and the results can be disastrous,such as gangrene or loss of a hand [7].

 

Twists or loops and sharp bendsbrachial artery or its branches is also one ofcause of access failure in the coronaryinterventions that can close blood vesselscausing ischemia [8]. In the current study, we havetried to elaborate the existingcourse and knowledge branchingbrachial artery pattern. Knowledgesuch variations are extremely importantclinical diagnosis and surgical treatmentdiseases of the upper limbs. It is also important that they are nephrologists and surgeonsaware of these arterial variations becauseusing these anomalous arteries to establishan arterio-venous approach can be considered viablein some cases an alternative route [9].

 

Knowledge of such unusual variations orchanges in the brachial artery are also importantfor radiologists to reduce diagnostic and therapeutic errors. Hence this study is aimed at observing normal branchingbrachial artery pattern and its variationscourse dates and branches resulting frombrachial artery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Limbs from 56 cadavers of Central Indian origindifferent age groups and genders (38 men and 18Women). Limbs were produced in the anatomy department for dissection purposesfirst year medical students at a tertiary medical college in Central India.

 

Upper limbwas carefully dissected to study the course& brachial artery branching pattern usingstandard procedure. [10]

 

Brachialarteries were identified and traced proximallyto continuity with axillary artery the level of the lower border of the teres major anddistal in the cubital fossa to its bifurcation. Branching pattern and relations of medial cord or brachial plexus in the armobserved. In each corpse, both upperthe limbs were dissected to record the presence orabsence of any variations and if any, whetherpresent unilateral or bilateral.Photographs were taken for documentation of the observedvariations.

RESULTS

In this study, among 112 upper limbs106 (94.5%) limbs showed a normal conditionbrachial artery and its branching pattern. Thebrachial artery arose as a continuation of 3rdpart of the axillary artery at the inferior borderof teres major muscle, was crossed superficiallymedian nerve crossed earlierto artery. All other branches were visiblewith normal origin from brachial arteryin theupper arm. (Table 1,2) i.e. Profundabrachii artery arose from the postero-medialaspect of the proximal humerusartery distal to the teres major muscle, superiorulnar collateral artery arose a little distallymiddle arm and lower ulnarthe lateral artery arose proximally from the elbow.

 

Table 1: Incidence of morphology and variations of

brachial artery in arm in the present study (2019).

Sr. No.

Total limbs

Morphology and variations

Number of variations

Side

Incidence

Right

Left

1

 

112

Normal

56

50

56

94.5%

2

SBA

6

6 (M)

-

5.5%

3

Tortuous and trifurcation of SBA

2

2 (M)

-

1.5%

               

 

Table 2: Comparison of incidence of Normal Brachial artery

Sr. No

Author

Year

No. of limbs

Incidence of normal pattern of brachial artery

1

Uglietta& Kadir [11]

1989

100

91%

2

Rodriguez-Niedenführ [12]

2001

384

77%

3

Patnaik et al. [13]

2002

50

82%

4

Murugapermal and MelaniRajendran [14]

2014

50

96%

5

Shivanal& Gowda [15]

2015

 

50

84%

6

Jayasree& Reddy [16]

2017

50

94%

7

Present Study

2024

112

94.5%

 

Table 3: Comparison of incidence of Superficial Brachial artery

Sr. No

Author

Year

No. of limbs

Incidence of SBA artery

1

Nakatani et al. [26]

1996

-

1 case

2

Kapur et al. [23]

2000

-

5

3

Patnaik et al. [13]

2002

-

6%

4

Yang et al. [24]

2008

304

12.2%

5

Singla and Lalit [18]

2011

-

1 case

6

Kachlik et al. [25]

2011

130

5%

7

Kaur et al. [27]

2011

-

1 case

8

Alfaouri-Kornieieva [28]

2013

-

1 case

9

Present Study

2024

112

5.5%

 

Table 4: Comparison of incidence of Trifurcation Superficial Brachial artery

Sr. No

Author

Year

No. of limbs

Incidence of Trifurcation of SBA artery

1

Malcic-Gurbuz et al. [36]

2002

-

1 case

2

Patnaik et al. [35]

2002

50

2%

3

Bilodi&Sanikop [33]

2004

-

1 case

4

Vollala et al. [34]

2008

-

-

5

Shivanal et al. [15]

2015

50

10%

6

Murugapermal&MelaniRajendran [14]

2014

50

2%

7

Jayasree& Reddy [16]

2017

50

94%

8

Present Study

2024

112

1.5%

 

Normal termination of the artery into the radial andulnar arteries at the level of neck of radius in thecubital fossa was observed. 6 (5.5%)upper limbs showed variations in brachialartery in the form of superficial brachialartery and trifurcation of brachial artery intoradial artery, ulnar artery and commoninterosseous artery was observed in 1.78% ofcases. (Table 1).

 

DISCUSSION

Brachial artery has great anatomic significance.  Our study explores few new variations in its course. As shown in Table 2, the resultsthe occurrence of normal brachial arteries wascompared to various studies that rangedfrom the lowest incidence of 77% to the highestan incidence of 96% that has been reportedMurugapermal G and MelaniRajendran (2014)[11-15]. In this study, the percentagesnormal brachial artery was found at 94.5%which supports the findings of Jayasree& Reddy(2017) [16].

 

Arterial variations are common in the upper partlimb. Mechanism of developmentarterial variations were subjectmany studies. Usually the brachial arterypasses deep into the median nerve medially to the lateral side in front of the arm.

 

But when it superficially crosses the median nerve and replaces the main trunk, it is calledas the superficial brachial artery [17,18].

 

These superficial brachial arteries cancontinue in the elbow and bifurcate asusually to the radial and ulnar arteries, bothsurface running in the forearm [19]with the deep division continuing into the forearm as the interosseous complex [20]. Lalit (2011) shed a flood of light on the earlierliterature that was and was related to this entityreported to be between 0.2% and 22% [18]. Superficial brachial artery formerlyreported as 6.0% by Poirier (1886), Linelle (1921)and Patnaik et al. (2002), 5.0% by Kapur et al.(2000) and Kachlik et al. (2011), 12.2% according to Yanget al (20081) [13,21-25]. However, so was the SBAreported by Nakatani et al. (1996), Kaur et al. (2011) and Alfaouri-Kornieieva (2013) [26-28].

 

According to Singer (1933) and Baeza et al.(1995) the brachial artery has two trunks origin. One passes deep into the median nerve andothers superficial to the median nerve, i.esuperficial brachial artery. During the later

 

stagesdevelopment usually gets a deep arteryhemodynamic preference leading to obliteration of the superficial brachial artery located proximal to the anastomosis, while the distal segmentsthey persist as part of the a. radialis. However ifartery passing superficial to the median nervereceives hemodynamic preference (such aspresent case) superficial brachial arterypersists while deep (normal) fades[29,30].

 

However, in this study, the brachial arteryin the upper two

they showed different endingslimbs of the same body. They were both ulnar and radialrun superficial to superficial flexor groupmuscles and the common interosseous artery wasongoing deep to superficial flexor groupsmuscles, while on the left upper limb,the brachial artery normally branches into the ulnar,and radial arteries. Trifurcation of the armartery to artery radialis, artery ulnaris andcommon interosseous arteries see inthe current study was also reportedHuber (1930), Lockhardt& Hamilton, (1959),Romanes (1964), Williams et al., (1999), Bilodi&Sanikop, (2004) and Vollala et al., (2008)[2,10,31-34].

 

According to Huber (1930) supernumeraryadditional branches to the usual branches may arisefrom the brachial artery, which may also give originwhen it bifurcates into a common interosseousartery or into the middle artery as a third branchand a radial recurrent branch of radials may arisefrom the distal part of the brachialis artery, which alsoinvolved its bifurcation [31]. William et al. (1999) mentioned under variations on brachialan artery that the brachial artery can bifurcateproximally and rejoin to form a single trunk orsometimes trifurcates proximally into the ulna,radial and common interosseous arteries [2].

 

Trifurcation in the center of the armthe cubital fossa was also described [14].Patnaik et al (2001) also found radialrecurrent artery as the third branch in trifurcation of the brachial artery in a fifty-year-old mancadaver in one right upper limb, acc2% [35].

 

Malcic-Gurbuz et al., in 2002 also observed aa case of brachial artery trifurcation to radial, ulnar, and superior ulnar collateralsarteries high in the arm [36]. Howeverindicated brachial artery trifurcation in 10% of themcases [15].

 

The case was also reported by Bilodi&Sanikop (2004).brachial artery trifurcation into ulnar, radial andcommon interosseous arteries on the left upper limbbut the main artery was not superficialbrachial artery as in this case [33].

 

For the formation of the common interosseous arteryfrom the superficial brachial artery is mildmodification in the Baeza et al (1995) model,development of the human brachio-antebrachialsystem. Before that, the superficial brachial arterydivision into two terminal branches (stage IIof Baeza et al 1995) reports a branch that mergesaxial artery distal to the origin of the deep component of the radial and ulnar arteries. Usually thisthe folder also disappears ashemodynamic preference runs deeppart of the axial artery.

 

Currently in ourstudy, we observed loops and acute bendsSBA, radial and ulnar arteries that can occludevessels causing ischemia. A variation on thisstudy are significant because tortuous SBA withkinked origin of the running radial and ulnar arteriesa tortuous course can result in a clinical emergency if medical personnel are not aware of ittype of variation.

 

An artery that included bifurcation [31]. William et al (1999) mentioned under brachial artery variations thatthe brachial artery may bifurcate proximally andreunite to form a single trunk or sometimes trifurcate proximally into the ulnar, radial, and common interosseous arteries [2]. Trifurcation inthe middle of the arm instead of the elbow socket haswere also reported [14]. Patnaik et al (2001) havealso found the radial recurrent artery as a third branchduring brachial artery trifurcation in the 1950syears old male corpse on one right upper limb,representing 2% [35].

 

Malcic-Gurbuz et al., in 2002 also observed aa case of brachial artery trifurcationradial, ulnar, and superior ulnar collateralsarteries high in the arm [36]. Howeverindicated brachial artery trifurcation in 10% of themcases [15].

 

The case was also reported by Bilodi&Sanikop (2004).brachial artery trifurcation into ulnar, radial andcommon interosseous arteries on the left upper limbbut the main artery was not superficialbrachial artery as in this case [33].

 

For the formation of the common interosseous arteryfrom the superficial brachial artery is mildmodification in the Baeza et al (1995) model.development of the human brachio-antebrachialsystem. Before that, the superficial brachial arterydivision into two terminal branches (stage IIof Baeza et al 1995) reports a branch that mergesaxial artery distal to the origin of the deep component of the radial and ulnar arteries. Usually this component persisted andthe deep component disappeared, leading to anorigin of common interosseous artery fromsuperficial brachial artery [18,30]. Currentlystudy we observed loops and acute bends

 

SBA, radial and ulnar arteries they can occludevessels causing ischemia. A variation on thisstudy are significant because tortuous SBA withkinked origin of the running radial and ulnar arteriesa tortuous course can result in a clinical emergency if medical personnel are not aware of ittype of variation.

 

The arteries of the upper limb form the initialcapillary plexus that emerges from the dorsalaorta and develops at the same rate as the limb.There is a rebuilding process involvingmagnification and resolution of the selectedparts [12]. Arey (1957) is of the view It is meantthat variations arise through persistence,disappearance, incomplete development andfusion of enlargement and differentiation of partsthe original network that would normallythey remain as capillaries or even regress [37].

CONCLUSION

Superficial brachial artery as wellsurface position of the ulnar aradial arteries or tortuosity not only doesare more vulnerable to trauma and therefore tobleeding, but also makes them more accessiblefor cannulation if necessary. These arteries canalso confused with veins. Therefore,overall understanding of the normal patternof brachial artery, its branches and itsvariation is essential for clinicianssurgeons to avoid iatrogenic injuries, for accurate diagnostic interpretation and therapyinterventions to reduce morbidity andmortality rate.

REFERENCES
  1. Standring S, Borely NR, Collins P, Crossman AR,Gatzoulis MA, Herly JC, et al. Gray’s Anatomy: TheAnatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Upper arm.40th Ed, London: Elsevier Ltd; 2008;Pp:827-836.
  2. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P,Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ. Gray’sAnatomy In: Arteries of the limbs & Cardiovascular System. Gabella, G. Edr. 38th Edn. ChurchillLivingstone, New York: 1999;Pp:1537-44.
  3. Singh H, Gupta N, Bargotra RN, Singh NP.Higher bifurcation of brachial artery with superficial course of radial artery in forearm: case report. JK Science. January-March 2010;12(1);39-40.
  4. Holinshed W H. Anatomy for surgeons: vol.3 (TheBack And Limbs). Third Edition, Philadelphia,Harper & Row 1982;Pp:366.
  5. Hazlett JW. Superficial ulnar artery with referenceto accidental intra-arterial injection. CanadianMedical Association Journal 1948;61:289-93.
  6. Pabst R and Lippert H. Beiderseitigesvorkommenvon A. brachialis superficialis , Ulnaris superficialisand A. mediana . AnatomischerAnzieger1968;123:223-226.
  7. Jurjus A, Sfeir R and Bezirdjian R. Unusual variationof arterial pattern of the human upper limb. AnatRec.1986;215:82-83.
  8. Bazemore E, Mann JT. Problems and complicationsof the transradial Approach for Coronary Interventions: A review. J Invasive Cardiol 2005Mar;17(3):156-9.
  9. Hunq YC, Yen HL, Vincent-wu, I-Jung Tsai, Dunwu K,JueyJH.Nephrology dialysis transplantation. Oxfordjournal of medicine. 2005; 20(11):2579-80.
  10. Romans GJ. Cunningham’s Textbook of Anatomy.In: The Blood Vascular System. Arteries of the upper limb. Walls, E.W. Edr. 10th Edn. Oxford University Press, New York: 1964;Pp: 885-893.
  11. Uglietta JP, Kadir S. Angiographic study of variantarterial anatomy of the upper extremities.Cardiovasc Int Radiol 1989;12:145-8.
  12. Rodriguez-Niedenführ M, Vazquez T, Nearn L,Ferreira B, Parkin I, SanúdoJR.Variations of thearterial pattern in the upper limb revisited: amorphological and statistical study, with a reviewof the literature. J Anat 2001;199:547–66.
  13. Patnaik VVG, Kalsey G, Rajan KS. Branching pattern of brachial artery-A Morphological Study. JAnat. Soc India 2002;51:176-86.
  14. Murugapermal G and MelaniRajendran S. Study oftrifurcation of brachial artery. Int J Curr MicrobiolApp Sci 2014;3(9):897-901
  15. Shivanal U, Gowda M S T. A study of variations inbrachial artery and its branching pattern. Int J ResMed Sci 2015;3(6):1392-1396
  16. Jayasree C, Reddy CK. A Cadaveric study on variations in brachial artery – An Anatomical Perspective. Perspectives in Medical Research 2017;5(2):29-32.
  17. Adachi B. Arteriensystem der Japaner. Kyoto, Verlagder Kaiserlich-JapanischenUniversitatzu Kyoto1928;205–210.
  18. Singla RK and Lalit M. Superficial Brachial Arterywith a High Origin of ProfundaBrachii and Common Interosseous Artery: A Case Report. Journal ofClinical and Diagnostic Research 2011;5(3):628-630
  19. Keen JA. A study of arterial variations in limbs withspecial reference to symmetry of vascular patterns.Am J Anat 1961;108:245-261.
  20. Vare A M and Bansal P C. A case of anomalous brachial artery and other associated vascular anomalies in a single upper limb. J Anat Soc Ind1969;18(2):50-53.
  21. Poirier P. Traite de Anatomie Humans Vol. II Battaille& Co. Paris. 1886;Pp:756.
  22. Linell EA. The distribution of the nerves in upperlimb with reference to variability & their clinicalsignificance. Journal of Anatomy. 1921;55:79.
  23. Kapur V, Suri RK, Manik P and Dhir V. Surgicalanatomy of median nerve. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India 2000;49(1):92.
  24. Yang HJ, Gil YC, Jung WS, Lee HY. Variations of thesuperficial brachial artery in Korean cadavers. JKorean Med Sci 2008;23:884–887.
  25. Kachlik D, Konarik M, Baca V. Vascular patterns ofupper limb: an anatomical study with accent onsuperficial brachial artery. Bosn J Basic Med Sci2011;11(1):4–10.
  26. Nakatani T, Tanaka S, Mizukami S, Shiraishi Y,Nakamura T. The superficial ulnar artery originating from the axillary artery. Ann Anat 1996;178:277–9.
  27. Kaur N, Patnaik VVG, Singla RK. Bilateral superficial brachial artery – a case report IJAV 2011;4:207–210.
  28. Alfaouri-Kornieieva M. Persistent superficialbrachial artery in humans. OA Case Reports2013;2(5):49.
  29. Singer E. Embryological patterns persisting inarteries of the arm. Anat Rec 1933;55:406-413.
  30. Baeza RA, Nebot J, Ferreira B, Reina F, Perez J, SaundoJ.R. et al. An Anatomical study and ontogenic explanation of 23 cases with variations in main patternof brachioantebrachial arteries. J Anat1995;187(2):473-479.
  31. Huber GC. Piersol’s Human Anatomy. In: The Vascular system. 9th Edn. Vol. I J.B. Lippincott. Co.Philedelphia 1930;Pp:767-791.
  32. Lockhardt RD, Hamilton GF. and Fufe FW. Anatomyof the human Body In: Vascular System- Systemicarteries. Faber & Faber Ltd.; London 1959;Pp:612-619.
  33. Bilodi AK, Sanikop MB. Variations in termination ofbrachial artery - a case report. Kathmandu UnivMed J 2004;2(1):49-51.
  34. Vollala VR, Nagabhooshana S, Bhat S M. Trifurcation of brachial artery with variant course of radialartery: Rareobservation. Anat. Sci. Int 2008;83:307309.
  35. Patnaik VVG, Kalsey G, SinglaRajan. Trifurcation ofBrachial artery-A case Report- Journal of Anatomical Society of India. 2001;50(2):163-165.
  36. Malcic-Gurbuz J, Gurunluogl R, Ozdogmus O, Yalin,Aymelek A. Unique case of trifurcation of the brachial artery: its clinical significance. Clinic Anat2002;15(3):224-7.
  37. Arey LB. Developmental Anatomy. In: Developmentof the arteries. 6th Edition. W.B Saunders Co, Philadelphia; 1957;Pp:375-377.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
A Comparative Study Between Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert Alone and Mechanical Method Along with Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening in Primigravida Women
...
Published: 18/07/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
An Observational Study of Dermatoses in Pregnancy in A Tertiary Care Hospital
Published: 30/03/2021
Download PDF
Research Article
Effects of sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia in patients undergoing breast surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
...
Published: 24/01/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Complicated Gallbladder Disease: Focus on Recovery and Complication Rates
Published: 24/01/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.