Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
67 Views
7 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 14 Issue 6 (Nov - Dec, 2024) | Pages 54 - 59
A Comparative Study of The Efficacy of Ondansetron, Dexamethasone, And Ondansetron-Dexamethasone Combination for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgeries
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Govt Medical college, Tiruvannamalai, Tamilnadu, India
2
Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
3
Intern, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India
4
Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, St Peter Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Hosur, Tamilnadu, India
5
Senior Resident, Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Oct. 6, 2014
Revised
Oct. 18, 2024
Accepted
Oct. 31, 2024
Published
Nov. 8, 2024
Abstract

Background and Objectives: In general, laparoscopic surgeries are linked to a high likelihood of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) approximately 20 – 51% with gynecological laparoscopy having an evenhigher rate (50 – 80%). This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of ondansetron and dexamethasone administered alone or in combination for the prevention of postoperative nauseaandvomitingin patients undergoinglaparoscopicsurgery. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty patients of age 18-75, ASA PS I-II of both gender who underwent laparoscopic surgeries were included in the study and divided into three groups. Ondansetron 4mg, dexamethasone8mg, ondansetron4mg, anddexamethasone8mgweregivenI/Voneminutebefore induction in Group O, Group D, and Group OD respectively. Patients were observed forthe incidence of nausea and vomiting and the requirement of rescue anti-emetics for the first 6hours. Statistical Analysis: Continuous data were analyzed using ANOVA.Categorical data wereanalyzedusingChi-squareor Fischer Exact whichever is appropriate. Results: The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in Group OD (12.5%) than GroupD (50%) and Group O (52.5%). The requirement for a rescue antiemetic was lower in Group OD (0%) than in GroupD (30%) orGroupO (27.5%). Conclusion:ThecombinationofOndansetronandDexamethasoneismoreeffectiveforprophylaxisagainstPONVthanondansetronandDexamethasonealoneinlaparoscopicsurgeries.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is the most common complication of surgery and  anaesthesia [1], it is the second most common complaint after postoperative pain in anaesthesia  practice[2],leadingtoadverseconsequencesincludingpatientdissatisfaction,unexpectedprolongationin-hospitalstay, and subsequent delayin return to work[3].

 

Laparoscopicsurgeriesrequirecarbondioxideinsufflationresultinginpneumoperitoneumandanincrease in intra-abdominal pressure, which is a significant risk factor for inciting nausea and vomiting [4].

 

PONV may lead to dehydration and electrolyte imbalance Extremely forcefully omitingcan lead to wound dehiscence and even ruptureoftheoesophagus. Various anti-emetic drugs, such as antihistaminics (e.g., hydroxyzine), butyrophenones(e.g.,droperidol),andgastrokineticagents(e.g.metoclopramide)havebeenusedtoreducetheincidenceof PONV, but some of the older anti-emetics are associated with undesirable side-effects [5,6].Failureofmonotherapywiththeaboveagentshasbeenreportedtobesignificant,andacombinationoftwoantiemeticdrugs,withdifferentsitesofaction,hasbeensuggestedtoprovidebetterprophylaxis against PONV.

 

DexamethasoneandondansetronhavebeenfoundtoreducePONVsignificantlyafterlaparoscopicsurgerieswhen compared with placebo[7,8,9]. Ondansetron, a 5-

 

Hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist, antagonizes the action of 5-HT at 5-

 

HT3receptorsonvagalafferentneuronsthatinnervatethegastr

ointestinaltractand5-Hydroxytrptamine 3 receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) of the central nervous system. Ondansetron has a plasma half-life of 4 hours and is, therefore, more effective when it is given at the end of a surgical procedure instead of immediately after induction anesthesia.

 

Since 1981, dexamethasone has been reported to be effective in reducing the incidence of emesisin patients undergoing chemotherapy [10,11,12].The antiemetic effect of dexamethasone was reported to be equal to or better than the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists such as ondansetron and granisetron. Recently, dexamethasone has also been reported to be effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy,adenoidectomy, and strabismus surgery [13-17] and in women undergoing major gynecological procedures [18-21].

 

Thisstudyisbeingconductedtofindoutthecomparativeefficacyoftheondansetrondexamethasonecombination, ondansetron alone, and dexamethasone alone in control of PONV.

MATERIALANDMETHODS

This randomized, prospective, double blinded clinical trial was conducted after approval by theethicalandscientificcommitteeandobtainingwritteninformedconsent. A total of 120 (40 in each arm) patients of either sex, aged 18-75 years, American Society of Anaesthesiology physicalstatus(ASAPS) Iand II who were scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgeries were included in the study. The sample size was calculated considering the unexposed with outcome as 12% and exposed with outcome as 28%, using Open Epi Software. Those patients with a history of motion sickness, diabetes, pregnancy, coexisting gastrointestinal pathology, psychiatric disturbance, smokers, chronic antiemetic medications, previously on opiates within 48 h before surgery, suffering from pre-operative emesis or pregnant or patients taking anti-histamines, anxiolytics, sedatives, and anti-emetics or with a known history of drug allergy, hypersensitivity to anti-emetics or suffering from ear disease and vertigo at the time of surgery and history of post-operative emesis were excluded from the study.

The study participants were randomly allocated into Group O, Group D, and Group OD using a computer -generated table. Concealment of allocation was done using sealed envelope method. Allpatientsunderwentapre-anaesthesiaassessmentbeforesurgeryandinformedwritten consent was obtained. No pre-medication was given and the patients were kept nil orally(NPO) from midnight to the day of surgery.(O-Ondansetron, D-Dexamethasone and OD-both On dansetron and Dexamethasone).

 

In the operating room, patients belonging to Group OD received ondansetron 4mg with dexamethasone 8mg IV one minute before induction, Group D received dexamethasone 8mg intravenous (IV) before induction, and Group O received ondansetron 4mg IV alone before induction. Afterpre-oxygenationwith100%oxygen, allthreegroupsreceivedfentanyl2g/kgi.v.Anaesthesia was induced with Propofol (2mg/kg), and tracheal intubation was achieved with atracurium(0.5mg/kg).Intraoperative muscle relaxation was achieved with a maintenance dose atracurium (0.2mg/kg).

 

Mechanical ventilation was done to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35 - 40 mmHg.Anaesthesiawasmaintainedwithisofluraneandnitrousoxide. Attheendofthesurgery, anaesthesiawasdiscontinuedandresidualneuromuscularblockadewasreversedwithi.v.neostigmine(0.05mg/kg)and glycopyrrolate(0.01mg/kg).Patientswereshiftedtotherecoveryroomwheretheywereobservedforthepresence of nauseaor vomiting and the requirement of rescueanti-emetics for the first 6 hours.

 

Metoclopramide 10mg IV was used as rescue medication in case of nausea that lasted for morethan 15 minutes or an episode of vomiting. The data was collected through structured proforma. Drugswerelabeledefficaciousifnonauseaandvomitingoccurred6hourspost-operativelyasperthe operative definition and no rescue anti-emetic was used.

 

Statistical analysis:

The data were entered in MS Excel and analyzed using SPSS22.0-Software. The descriptive statistics included frequencies, proportions and percentages for categorical variables while the continuous variables were analyzed in mean, median and standard deviation. Chi – square test was used to analyze inferential statistics for categorical variables. Normally distributed continuous data was analyzed using ANOVA test. A p-valueof0.05was considered as thelevel of significance.

RESULTS

The clinical parameters and demographic characteristics of the patient such as age, gender, weight, ASA physical status, diagnosis and type of surgery are given in Table-1. The groups arecomparable (p>0.05) with respect to the patient characteristics.

 

Table 2 shows the incidence of nausea at 0 -1 hour and 1 – 6 hours among the three groups. Theincidenceofnauseafrom0to1houris7.5%inOndansetrongroup,20%inDexamethasone group and 2.5% in Ondansetron and Dexamethasone group. The chi-squareresult shows that there is a significant difference between the groups with respect to theincidenceofnauseafrom0to1hour(chi-square =7.222,P= 0.027). The incidence of nausea from 1 to 6 hour is 22.5% in Ondansetron group, 7.5% inDexamethasonegroupand5%inOndansetronandDexamethasonegroup.Thechi-squareresult shows that there is a significant difference between the groups with respect to the incidence ofnauseafrom1to6hour(chi-square =6.954,P=0.031).

 

The incidence of vomiting at 0 -1 hour and 1 – 6 hours among the three groups. The incidence of vomiting from 0 to 1 hour is 5% in the Ondansetron group, 17.5% in the Dexamethasone group, and 2.5% in Ondansetron and Dexamethasone group. The chi-square result shows that there is a significant difference between the groups with respect to theincidenceofvomitingfrom0to1hour(chi-square=6.764,P=0.034). The incidence of vomiting from 1 to 6 hours is 17.5% in the Ondansetron group, 5% in the Dexamethasone group, and 2.5% in Ondansetron and Dexamethasone group. The chi-square result shows that there is a significant difference between the groups with respect to the incidence of vomiting from 1to6 hours(chi-square=6.764,P=0.034).

 

Table 3 shows the correlation between overall incidence of nausea and vomiting with the three groups. 52.5% of patients had overall incidence of nausea and vomiting in Ondansetron group,50% of patients had overall incidence of nausea and vomiting in Dexamethasone group and12.5%ofpatientshadoverallincidenceofnauseaandvomitinginOndansetronandDexamethasone group. Chi-square test shows that there is a significant difference between ingroups with respect to the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting (Chi-square = 16.992, P <0.001).

 

Table 4 depicts the correlationbetweenthenumberofrescuesantiemeticsrequiredineachgroup. 30% of patients needed rescue antiemetic in Ondansetron group, 27.5% of patients needed rescue antiemetic in Dexamethasone group and none of the patients needed recueantiemetic in Ondansetron and Dexamethasone group. Chi-square test shows that there is a significant difference between ingroups with respect to the number of rescue antiemetic  required(Chi-square=14.307,P<0.001).

 

Adverse effects

The side effects commonly associated with the use of ondansetron and dexamethasone areheadache, diarrhoea, and constipation.In this study, 2 patients in the ondansetron group,1patientinthedexamethasonegroup,and1patientintheondansetronplusdexamethasonehadheadache. The headache was mild in all the patients. Hence there was no clinicallysignificantincidenceofanycomplicationassociatedwitheitherofthetwodrugsusedforprophylaxisinourstudy.

 

 

 

Table 1: Characteristics of the patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Variable

Group O(n=30)

Group D

(n=30)

GroupOD (n=30)

P value

Age(years) [Mean ± SD]

40.43 ±13.35

41.95±13.87

37.23 ± 12.58

0.271

Gender(Male/Female)

10/30

16/24

18/22

0.155

Weight (kg) [Mean ± SD]

59.08 ± 10.10

59.45 ± 11.22

59.03 ± 7.55

0. 978

ASA PS I/II(n)

22/18

19/21

18/22

0.648

Diagnosis

(Abdominal pain for evaluation/ cholelithiasis/ recurrent appendicitis)

9/26/5

7/22/11

 

6/19/15

 

 

0.156

Typeof surgery

(Diagnostic laparoscopy/Appendicectomy/Cholecystectomy)

9/5/26

7/11/22

6/15/19

0.156

Chi-Square Test, ANOVA Test

 

Table 2: Incidence of nausea and vomiting (0 – 1 hour) and (1 – 6 hour) among the three groups

 

Group O

GroupD

Group OD

P value

Incidence of nausea

0-1 Hour

3(7.5%)

8(20.0%)

1(2.5%)

0.027*

1-6 Hour

9(22.5%)

3(7.5%)

2(5%)

0.031*

Incidence of vomiting

0-1 Hour

2(5%)

7(17.5%)

1(2.5%)

0.034*

1-6 Hour

7(17.5%)

2(5%)

1(2.5%)

0.034*

Chi-Square Test

 

Table 3: CorrelationbetweenOverallIncidenceofnauseaandvomitingwithGroups

 

Groups

Over allIncidenceofnauseaandvomiting

p value

Present

Absent

 

 

 

< 0.001*

N

%

N

%

Ondansetron

21

52.5%

19

47.5%

Dexamethasone

20

50%

20

50%

Ondansetr on and    Dexamethasone

5

12.5%

35

87.5%

Chi-Square Test

 

Table 4: Correlationbetweenthenumberofrescuesantiemeticsrequiredineachgroup

 

Groups

Rescue Anti emetic

p value

Metroclopromide

Nil

 

 

 

< 0.001*

N

%

N

%

Ondansetron

12

30

28

70

  Dexamethasone

11

27.5

29

72.5

Ondansetronand    Dexamethasone

0

0

40

100

Chi-Square Test

DISCUSSION

Postoperativenauseaandvomitingisacommonsequelofgeneralanaesthesiaandaleadingcauseof delayed discharge and unanticipated hospital admissions following ambulatory surgery. Itcanbeverydistressingtothepatient, sometimesmorethanthesurgeryitself,anditcanresultinseveralcomplicationslikeabdominalpain,tachycardia,sweating,andincreasedriskofaspirationdehydration, wound disruption, and gastric aspiration. Plenty of antiemetic drugs are availablethese days which include anticholinergic drugs (scopolamine, atropine), antihistaminic drugs(diphenhydramine hydroxzine), dopamine antagonist drugs (promethazine, prochlorperazineandmetoclopramide),5HT3receptorantagonists(ondansetron,dolasetronandgranisetron)andsteroids(dexamethasone).Inspiteofplentyofantiemeticdrugsavailable,nosingleagentis100%effectiveagainstPONV.AccordingtoSAMBAguidelines,PONVismultifactorialduringlaparoscopic surgeries, so, a combination of different groups of antiemetics is generally preferredtocontrolpostoperativenauseaandvomiting [22,23].SAMBAguidelinesforPONV

 

[24]asfollows:1.IdentifypatientsatriskforPONV;2.EmploymanagementstrategiestoreducePONVrisk;3.EmployonetotwoprophylacticmeasuresinadultsatmoderatePONVrisk;4.Usemultipleinterventions in patients at high PONV risk; 5. Administer prophylactic antiemetic therapy tochildren at high risk using combination therapy; 6. Provide antiemetic therapy to patients withPONV who did not receive prophylactic therapy or in whom prophylaxis failed.Therapy shouldbewith a drugfrom adifferentclassthan which failed to provideprophylaxis.

Thecurrentstudycomparedtheefficacyofondansetron4mg,dexamethasone8mg,andacombination of ondansetron 4 mg and dexamethasone 8mg in the prevention of PONV afterlaparoscopiccholecystectomy.Theincidenceofpostoperativenauseaandvomitingwerenotedintwo-time framesaftersurgeryi.e.01hrs,16hrs.AhmedNetalstudied67patientsreceivingacombinationofondansetronanddexamethasoneforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitingfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomy[25]Theyobservednonauseaandvomitingin85%of patients.They concluded that the combination antiemesis was more effective against PONV.Ourresultsarecomparablewithrespecttotheondansetronanddexamethasonecombination.BanoFetalstudiedondansetron4mgplusdexamethasonecombinationwithdexamethasone8mgalonein patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy[26].

 

They found that 81.6% of patients didn'thave nausea and vomiting post-operatively in the combination group, while 60.4% of patients didnot complain of either nausea or vomiting in the dexamethasone group.They concluded that thecombinationantiemesisofondansetronplusdexamethasonewasmoreeffectivethandexamethasone alone for prophylaxis against PONV.Bhattarai B et al compared the efficacyand safety of ondansetron 4mg with or without dexamethasone 4mg given as prophylaxis forPONV in 100 (50 in each group) adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery[27].They concludedthat the combination anti-emesis of ondansetron plus dexamethasone was more effective thanondansetron alone for prophylaxis against PONV.They found that a complete response occurredin 92% of patients in the combination group. The results of the current study seem statisticallycomparable. Ahsan et al studied the efficacy of ondansetron 4mg plus dexamethasone 8mg andondansetron 4 mg alone for prophylaxis against PONV in 100 ASA I and II patients undergoinglaparoscopic cholecystectomy with general anaesthesia[28]. They found that complete response (nonausea and emesis episode during the 6-hour post-operative period) occurred in 88% of patientsin the ondansetron and dexamethasone group, and in 72% of patients in the ondansetron group.Theyconcludedthatprophylacticcombinationanti-emesisiseffectiveagainstPONV.Theresultsof thecurrent studyseemstatisticallycomparable.

 

GautamBetalconductedastudythatcompared theefficacyofondansetronanddexamethasonecombinationversusondansetronanddexamethasonealoneforprophylaxisofpostoperativenauseaand vomiting following laparoscopic cholecystectomy[29].Complete response occurred in 89.4%patientsofcombinationgroup.Rescueantiemeticswererequiredin8.5%patientsofthecombinationgroup.Theyconcludedthatthecombinationantiemesisofondansetronplusdexamethasone was more effective than ondansetron and dexamethasone alone for prophylaxisagainst PONV.The results of the current study were comparable with respect to the combinationgroup was 87.5% versus 89.4%.Our results were comparable with respect to rescue antiemetictherapy incombinationgroup 0% vs8.5%.Kumaret alcomparedthe preventing role ofondansetron,dexamethasone,andondansetronplusdexamethasonecombinationforpostoperative 

nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[30].A complete response showed thatpatients had no nausea and vomiting during the postoperative period was 90% in the combinationgroup, 65% in ondansetron, and 70% in the dexamethasone group. Rescue antiemetics in thepostoperativeperiodwererequiredin35%patientsofondansetrongroup,30%inthedexamethasone group, and no rescue antiemetic was required in the combination group.  

 

Theyconcluded that an antiemetic drug combination was more effective than an antiemetic drug aloneagainst PONV following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Our result was comparable with respecttothecombination groupi.e.87.5%vs90%andnorescueantiemeticrequiredinthecombinationgroup was similarto ourcurrent study.

CONCLUSION

We conclude from our study that the combination of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone is moreeffectiveforcontrolofPONVthanOndansetronandDexamethasonealoneasprophylaxisagainst PONV followinglaparoscopicsurgeryandthatDexamethasonealoneisnoteffectiveinpreventingearly PONV. In addition, Ondansetron alone is less effective against late PONV compared tocombinedOndansetronand Dexamethasonetherapy.

 

Authors contribution

Dr.Kalasree-Design,writingthemanuscript,andinterpretationofdata.

Dr.-Concept, manuscript review, andfinal approval.

Dr.NagalingamNatarajan-DefinitionofintellectualcontentandLiteraturesearch.

Dr.GopalakrishnanKuppusamy-Writingthemanuscript,datacollection,andstatisticalanalysisDr.Parthiban Nagaraj- paper writing and correspondence

 

CONFLICTSOFINTEREST

None.

AUTHORS FUNDING

Nofinancialinterestinanypartofthestudy.

ETHICALCOMMITTEEAPPROVAL

Ethical committee and Clinical trial registry-India approval were obtained.

REFERENCES
  1. Watcha, M. F., and P. F. White. "Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Its Etiology, Treatment, and Prevention." Anesthesiology, vol. 77, 1992, pp. 162-184.
  2. Halliday, T. A., et al. "Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Bariatric Surgery Patients: An Observational Study." Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 61, 2017, pp. 471-479.
  3. Muchatuta, N. A., and M. J. Paech. "Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: Focus on Palonosetron." Therapeutic Clinical Risk Management, vol. 5, 2009, pp. 21-34.
  4. Argiriadou, H., et al. "Tropisetron Versus Ondansetron for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study." Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 16, 2002, pp. 1087-1090.
  5. DeGrandi, T., and J. E. Simon. "Promethazine-Induced Dystonic Reaction." Pediatric Emergency Care, vol. 3, 1987, pp. 91-92.
  6. Melnick, B., et al. "Delayed Side Effects of Droperidol After Ambulatory General Anesthesia." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 69, 1989, pp. 748-751.
  7. Alghanem, S. M., et al. "Optimization of Anesthesia Antiemetic Measures Versus Combination Therapy Using Dexamethasone or Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting." Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 24, no. 2, 2010, pp. 353-358.
  8. Zhang, J., et al. "Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request in Southeast China." Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 111, 2008, pp. 1077-1083.
  9. Penn, Z., and S. Ghaem-Maghami. "Indications for Caesarean Section." Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 15, 2001, pp. 1-9.
  10. Aapro, M. S., and D. S. Alberts. "Dexamethasone as an Antiemetic in Patients Treated with Cisplatin." New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 305, 1981, p. 520.
  11. Sekine, I., et al. "Phase II Study of High-Dose Dexamethasone-Based Association in Acute and Delayed High-Dose Cisplatin-Induced Emesis – JCOG Study 9413." British Journal of Cancer, vol. 76, 1997, pp. 90-92.
  12. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research. "Dexamethasone, Granisetron, or Both for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting During Chemotherapy for Cancer." New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, 1995, pp. 1-5.
  13. Pappas, A. L., et al. "The Effect of Preoperative Dexamethasone on the Immediate and Delayed Postoperative Morbidity in Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 87, no. 1, 1998, pp. 57-61.
  14. Tom, L. W., et al. "Dexamethasone in Adenotonsillectomy." International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 37, no. 2, 1996, pp. 115-120.
  15. Splinter, W. M., and D. J. Roberts. "Dexamethasone Decreases Vomiting by Children After Tonsillectomy." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 83, no. 5, 1996, pp. 913-916.
  16. Splinter, W. M., and D. J. Roberts. "Prophylaxis for Vomiting by Children After Tonsillectomy: Dexamethasone Versus Perphenazine." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 85, no. 3, 1997, pp. 534-537.
  17. Splinter, W. M., and E. J. Rhine. "Low-Dose Ondansetron with Dexamethasone More Effectively Decreases Vomiting After Strabismus Surgery in Children Than Does High-Dose Ondansetron." Anesthesiology, vol. 88, no. 1, 1998, pp. 72-75.
  18. Fujii, Y., et al. "The Effects of Dexamethasone on Antiemetics in Female Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 85, no. 4, 1997, pp. 913-917.
  19. McKenzie, R., et al. "Comparison of Ondansetron with Ondansetron Plus Dexamethasone in the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 79, no. 5, 1994, pp. 961-964.
  20. Lopez-Olaondo, L., et al. "Combination of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone in the Prophylaxis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting." British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 76, no. 6, 1996, pp. 835-840.
  21. Liu, K., et al. "Effect of Dexamethasone on Postoperative Emesis and Pain." British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 80, no. 1, 1998, pp. 85-86.
  22. Scuderi, P. E., et al. "Multimodal Antiemetic Management Prevents Early Postoperative Vomiting After Outpatient Laparoscopy." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 91, 2000, pp. 1408-1414.
  23. Rajeeva, V., et al. "Comparison of Ondansetron with Ondansetron and Dexamethasone in Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Diagnostic Laparoscopy." Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 46, 1999, pp. 40-44.
  24. Gan, T. J., et al. "Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Guidelines for Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting." Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 105, 2007, pp. 1615.
  25. Ahsan, K., et al. "Comparison of Efficacy of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone Combination and Ondansetron Alone in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy." Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, vol. 64, no. 3, 2014, pp. 242-246.
  26. Bano, F., et al. "Dexamethasone Plus Ondansetron for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparison with Dexamethasone Alone." Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, vol. 18, no. 5, 2008, pp. 265-269.
  27. Bhattarai, B., et al. "Comparison of Ondansetron and Combination of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone as a Prophylaxis for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Adults Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Surgery." Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock, vol. 4, no. 2, 2011, pp. 168-172.
  28. Ahsan, K., et al. "Comparison of Efficacy of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone Combination and Ondansetron Alone in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy." Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, vol. 64, no. 3, 2014, pp. 242-246.
  29. Gautam, B., et al. "Antiemetic Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting with Ondansetron-Dexamethasone Combination Compared to Ondansetron or Dexamethasone Alone for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy." Kathmandu University Medical Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, 2008, pp. 319-328.
  30. Kumar, A., et al. "A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating Preventive Role of Ondansetron, Dexamethasone, and Ondansetron Plus Dexamethasone for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy." Journal of the Indian Medical Students Association, vol. 26, no. 4, 2013, pp. 217-218.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Study of prevalence and Risk Factors of Non communicable Diseases among the Adult Population of Kokrajhar District, Assam
...
Published: 06/12/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
Clinico-Radiological Correlation of Degenerative Lumbar, Spine on Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Modified, Oswestry Disability Index
...
Published: 11/12/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
A Study of Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Cardiac Markers in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Accidents in First 24 Hours
Published: 01/03/2022
Download PDF
Research Article
Primary Screening of Cervical Screening Tests in A Tertiary Care Centre.
...
Published: 11/12/2024
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.