Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
147 Views
15 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 3 (March, 2025) | Pages 895 - 898
A study of laboratory predictors of severity of sickle cell disease in a tertiary hospital in Central India.
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, KMSK GMCH CHANDRAPUR
2
Associate Professor Department Of Pathology, KMSK GMCH CHANDRAPUR
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Community medicine, KMSK GMCH CHANDRAPUR
4
Assistant Professor, Department of Community medicine, KMSK GMCH CHANDRAPUR.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 19, 2025
Revised
Feb. 28, 2025
Accepted
March 11, 2025
Published
March 30, 2025
Abstract

Background:  Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common monogenic disorder, although the diversity and heterogenicity of clinical presentations render estimations of disease severity unpredictable. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine if laboratory markers could serve as indicators of SCD severity. Methodology: This study was a cross sectional observational study done in a tertiary medical college in central India from 1stOctober 2022 to September 2023 on 180 patients with sickle cell disease. Observation And Results: In our study we observed a positive significant association between the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits with white blood cells (WBC) (R = 0.231, R = 0.206), respectively. Similarly, positive significant associations were found between the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits with platelets (R = 0.383, R = 0.266), respectively. Conversely, negative significant relationships were found between the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits (ER) with hemoglobin (Hb) F (R = -0.258, R = -0.253), respectively. Additionally, significant negative relationships were found between Hb F (R = -0.213) and the frequency of ICU admission. Only the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits annually were significantly predicted with P values of 0.021 and 0.038, respectively. Moreover, an increase in WBC was found to significantly increase the chance of undergoing splenectomy by 23.02%.  Conclusions: In SCD,Inflammatory markers are valuable tools for better risk stratification and could be translated into developing new therapeutic strategies and modifying the treatment paradigm

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

We all know that sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by the inheritance of abnormal beta-globin alleles carrying the sickle mutation on the beta-globin (HBB) gene. It is the most common monogenetic disease, with millions affected worldwide [1,2]. The central India region has the highest prevalence rates, approximately 17% for sickle cell trait and 1.2% for SCD [3,4].

Pain is the hallmark of SCD that increases throughout life, leading to hospitalization and poor quality of life. Nevertheless, SCD is a multisystem complex disorder that is also characterized by chronic hemolytic anemia, progressive organ failure, and increased risk of mortality [5,6]. In the 1970s, the median survival rate for patients with sickle cell disease was around 20 years. However, with the introduction of measures such as antibiotic prophylaxis to combat encapsulated organisms, vaccinations, and the use of hydroxyurea, there has been a significant improvement in survival rates for SCD patients [6,7]. However, survival has not changed over the last 25 years, and multiple studies indicate that certain groups of patients are at high risk of early mortality compared to others. For instance, adults with a tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV) of at least 2.5 m/s, obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease die early [8,9]. The diversity and heterogenicity of SCD clinical presentations render estimations of disease severity unpredictable. Additionally, there is limited data addressing predictors of SCD severity [7,10]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether laboratory indices could be utilized as predictors of SCD severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a cross sectional observational study done in a tertiary medical college in central India from 1stOctober 2022 to September 2023 on 180 patients with SCD

Participants were adult Saudi patients with SCD, aged 18 to 65, selected through a systematic non-randomized sampling method. The researchers provided the participants with a comprehensive explanation of the study objectives, the data collection process, the significance of conducting this research, the right to participate, and the confidentiality and anonymity of the data.

Each participant was interviewed by a trained interviewer to complete a survey. The survey consisted of demographic and clinical information, including comorbidities, frequency of hospitalizations and emergency visits, blood transfusion, previous intensive care unit (ICU) admission, history of stroke, and surgical and medication history.

Furthermore, additional clinical and laboratory data, including complete blood count, hemoglobin electrophoresis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and kidney function tests, were obtained via the electronic database of the hospital.

Descriptive statistics were computed and reported as frequencies and proportions (%) for categorical variables, while mean and standard deviation were used to describe continuous variables. The severity indicators and predictors were evaluated using a Pearson correlation. The strength of the association was assessed using Cohen's standard, where coefficients between 0.10 and 0.29 indicated a small effect size, coefficients between 0.30 and 0.49 indicated a moderate effect size and coefficients above 0.50 indicated a large effect size. The results were statistically significant at P <0.05. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 26.

 

 

RESULTS

In our study, 180 adult patients with sickle cell disease were included with a mean age of 32.33 ± 11.84 years. The mean number of ICU admissions was 2.75 ± 3.01, and the mean number of emergency visits per year was 8.43 ± 5.61. Patient demographics and characteristics are shown in Table 1.

 

TABLE 1 showing multivariate logistic regression analysis of total knowledge, attitude and practice score.

Characteristic

No.

%

Age (Mean ± SD)

32.33 ± 11.84

Gender

Male

Female

 

54

126

 

30

70

Educational level

No formal education

Elementary school

Intermediate school

Secondary higher educations

Graduation

Master

 

10

22

32

76

34

6

 

5.5

12.2

17.8

42.2

18.9

3.3

Previous ICU admissions

Yes

No

 

134

46

 

74.4

25.6

History of stroke

Yes

No

 

2

178

 

1.1

89.9

Splenectomy

Yes

No

 

26

154

 

14.4

58.6

Cholecystectomy

Yes

No

 

66

114

 

36.7

63.3

Joint replacement

Yes

No

 

10

170

 

5.6

94.4

Taking hydroxyurea

Yes

No

 

84

96

 

46.7

53.3

Number of blood transfusion throughout life (Mean ± SD)

6.29 ± 4.3

Frequency of ICU admission (Mean ± SD)

2.75 ± 3.01

Number of hospitalizations per year (Mean ± SD)

4.7 ± 4.57

Number of emergency visits per year (Mean ± SD)

8.43 ± 5.61

 

Our study revealed a positive significant relationship between the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits with the white blood cell (WBC) (R = 0.231, R = 0.206), respectively. Similarly, positive significant associations were found between the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits with platelets (R = 0.383, R = 0.266), respectively. Conversely, negative significant relationships were found between the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits (ER) with hemoglobin (Hb) F (R = -0.268, R = -0.263), respectively. Additionally, significant negative relationships were found between Hb F (R = -0.213) and the intensive care unit admission frequency.

Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to predict the frequency of hospitalization, ER visits, blood transfusions, and ICU admission. Only the number of hospitalizations and emergency visits annually were significantly predicted with P values of 0.021 and 0.038, respectively (Tables 2 and 3). On the other hand, the models intended to predict the number of blood transfusions and frequency of ICU admission were not significant (P values of 0.055 and 0.075), respectively. Furthermore, binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to predict joint replacement and splenectomy. The prediction of joint replacement was not significant (P = 0.608), while the model for splenectomy prediction was significant (P <0.001). An increase in WBC was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of splenectomy, where a one-unit increase in WBC raised the chances of undergoing a splenectomy by 23.02% (Table 4).

 

Table 2 showing linear regression predicting the number of hospitalizations per year

Variable

B

SE

95.00% CI

β

t

P

(Intercept)

-7.57

18.04

[-43.47, 28.34]

0.00

-0.42

.676

WBC

0.06

0.11

[-0.15, 0.27]

0.07

0.56

.576

HbA

0.09

0.18

[-0.27, 0.46]

0.34

0.51

.614

Platelets

0.007

0.003

[0.001, 0.01]

0.29

2.46

.016

LDH

0.001

0.003

[-0.006, 0.008]

0.04

0.36

.720

Gender

-0.83

1.06

[-2.93, 1.27]

-0.08

-0.79

.435

HbF

-0.04

0.17

[-0.37, 0.29]

-0.06

-0.26

.798

HbS

0.10

0.19

[-0.28, 0.48]

0.32

0.53

.599

MCV

0.03

0.04

[-0.06, 0.11]

0.07

0.62

.534

 

Table 3 showing Linear regression predicting the number of emergency visits per year

Variable

B

SE

95.00% CI

β

t

P

(Intercept)

-2.60

22.36

[-47.09, 41.88]

0.00

-0.12

.908

WBC

0.08

0.13

[-0.19, 0.34]

0.07

0.57

.572

HbA

0.07

0.23

[-0.39, 0.52]

0.19

0.29

.775

Platelets

0.004

0.004

[-0.004, 0.01]

0.12

1.00

.322

MCV

0.05

0.05

[-0.06, 0.15]

0.10

0.90

.369

HbF

-0.11

0.20

[-0.51, 0.30]

-0.13

-0.51

.609

HbS

0.03

0.24

[-0.44, 0.50]

0.08

0.13

.894

LDH

0.004

0.004

[-0.004, 0.01]

0.12

1.05

.298

Gender

1.58

1.31

[-1.02, 4.18]

0.13

1.21

.231

 

Table 4 showing Binary logistic regression predicting splenectomy

Variable

B

SE

χ2

P

OR

95.00% CI

(Intercept)

-5.01

48.42

0.01

.918

-

-

WBC

0.21

0.10

4.47

.034

1.23

[1.02, 1.49]

HbA

-0.004

0.52

0.00

.994

1.00

[0.36, 2.74]

platelets

0.005

0.002

3.31

.069

1.00

[1.00, 1.01]

MCV

0.02

0.05

0.19

.661

1.02

[0.93, 1.12]

HbF

-0.17

0.48

0.12

.732

0.85

[0.33, 2.19]

HbS

0.04

0.52

0.01

.940

1.04

[0.37, 2.89]

LDH

-0.006

0.004

2.31

.128

0.99

[0.99, 1.00]

Gender

-1.15

1.08

1.13

.287

0.32

[0.04, 2.62]

DISCUSSION

Sickle cell disease is a complex disorder that reflects underlying complex pathophysiology. Despite the existence of several disease-modifying agents, there are still unmet needs. Stem cell transplantation and gene therapy are attractive potential curative treatment options for SCD but are faced with some limitations and potential complications. These include lack of matched siblings, graft rejections, and possible risk of secondary malignancies [11,12]. Therefore, risk stratifications for patients with SCD might help identify individuals who could benefit from these treatments or interventions at earlier stages in their lives. Several models for classification systems in clinical settings, such as the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, 65 years of age and older (CURB-65) for pneumonia, or the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) for sepsis, have been developed and widely used due to their validity, reliability, and clinical value [13]. Although there is no such classification system for SCD, there have been previous great efforts to establish severity indexes for patients with SCD. For instance, Shah and colleagues, in their recent study, devised a system that categorizes patients into homogeneous groups based on disease state. This system incorporates various factors, including organ damage, hemoglobin genotype, age, presence of chronic pain, and the frequency of unscheduled acute care visits per year. The purpose of this system is to aid clinical decision-making by providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient characteristics [13]. However, further studies are still needed to validate this system.

This study was designed to investigate laboratory markers that could predict SCD severity. It showed that patients with leukocytosis tend to have frequent hospitalization as well as increased emergency visits, irrespective of the severity of the crisis. Interestingly, leukocytosis was more prevalent among those who underwent splenectomy. However, our study is retrospective, and we cannot assess whether participants had leukocytosis before splenectomy or as a consequence. These findings add to previous reporting that leukocytosis among patients with SCD is not restricted to poor outcomes but also to frequency of visits, which translates into poor quality of life and increased economic burden [14,15]. Similarly, thrombocytosis was significantly correlated with annual hospitalization and frequent emergency visits but poorly correlated with intensive care unit admissions. These are consistent with reports indicating thrombocytopenia is more common in individuals with multiorgan failure and non-survivors [16,17]. On the other hand, the level of hemoglobin F was inversely proportional to the frequency of hospitalization and ICU admission. In other words, the higher the hemoglobin F, the lower the severity of the disease, which is consistent with the fact that hemoglobin F is known to ameliorate the clinical complications of SCD [18].

This study emphasizes that the inflammatory process of SCD represented by leukocytosis and thrombocytosis plays a vital role in determining disease severity but does not necessarily predict poor outcomes and mortality. Additionally, persistent steady-state leukocytosis and thrombocytosis highlight that inflammation is an ongoing process with inflammation resolution failure [19]. Contrarily, a high hemoglobin F level is a helpful predictor and modifier of SCD severity, though none of these markers could predict individuals with increased demand for frequent blood transfusion. However, these factors should be incorporated into a risk stratification system to recognize individuals with severe disease and offer them curative treatment or use a multimodal approach at the early stage of the disease. Furthermore, additional studies are needed to identify more predictors of morbidity and whether these markers could be used to predict mortality.

REFERENCES
  1. Houwing ME, de Pagter PJ, van Beers EJ, Biemond BJ, Rettenbacher E, Rijneveld AW, et al. Sickle cell disease: Clinical presentation and management of a global health challenge. Blood Rev. 2019;37:100580.
  2. Carden MA, Little J. Emerging disease-modifying therapies for sickle cell disease. Haematologica. 2019;104(9):1710–1719.
  3. Jastaniah W. Epidemiology of sickle cell disease in Central India. 2011;31(3):289–93.
  4. Raj M et al. The Burden of Sickle Cell Disease in Central India: A Single-Institution Large Retrospective Study. Int J Gen Med. 2023;16:161–171.
  5. Ware RE, de Montalembert M, Tshilolo L, Abboud MR. Sickle cell disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):311–323.
  6. Tran H, Gupta M, Gupta K. Targeting novel mechanisms of pain in sickle cell disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017;2017(1):546–555.
  7. Jagadeeswaran R, Rivers A. Evolving treatment paradigms in sickle cell disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017;2017(1):440–446.
  8. Lubeck D, Agodoa I, Bhakta N, Danese M, Pappu K, Howard R, et al. Estimated Life Expectancy and Income of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Compared With Those Without Sickle Cell Disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1915374.
  9. Fitzhugh CD. Long-term health effects of curative therapy for sickle cell disease. Hematology. 2022;2022(1):266–271.
  10. Steinberg MH, Sebastiani P. Genetic modifiers of sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol. 2012;87(8):795–803.
  11. Ribeil JA, Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Payen E, Magnani A, Semeraro M, Magrin E, et al. Gene therapy in a patient with sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(9):848–855.
  12. .Kavanagh PL, Fasipe TA, Wun T. Sickle Cell Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2022;328(1):57–68.
  13. Shah N, Beenhouwer D, Broder MS, Bronte-Hall L, De Castro LM, Gibbs SN, et al. Development of a Severity Classification System for Sickle Cell Disease. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;12:625–633.
  14. Tewari S, Brousse V, Piel FB, Menzel S, Rees DC. Environmental determinants of severity in sickle cell disease. Haematologica. 2015;100(9):1108–16.
  15. Akinbami A, Dosunmu A, Adediran A, Oshinaike O, Adebola P, Arogundade O. Haematological values in homozygous sickle cell disease in steady state and haemoglobin phenotypes AA controls in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:396.
  16. .Shome DK, Jaradat A, Mahozi AI, Sinan AS, Ebrahim A, Alrahim M, et al. The Platelet Count and its Implications in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Admitted for Intensive Care. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22(8):585–590.
  17. Omoti CE. Haematological values in sickle cell anaemia in steady state and during vaso-occlusive crisis in Benin City, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2005;4(2):6267. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/aam/article/view/8344. [Google Scholar]
  18. Paikari A, Sheehan VA. Fetal haemoglobin induction in sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol. 2018;180(2):189–200.
  19. Hogg PJ. TMX1: a new vascular thiol isomerase. Blood. 2019;133(3):188–190.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Effect of OM meditation on cardiovascular parameters in hypertensive patients
...
Published: 22/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Endotracheal Size Estimation in Children: What is Latest? Different Methods and Correlation – A Prospective Observational Study
...
Published: 22/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Mucocutaneous Manifestations of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Children
...
Published: 20/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Influence of Ketogenic Diet on Gastric Functions, Motility, in Central Indian Subjects: A Case-Control Study on the
Published: 07/05/2024
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.