Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
74 Views
2 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume:1 Issue 2 (None, 2011) | Pages 61 - 63
A study of risk factors of hepatitis B infection Females of Rural Population of North India
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Santosh Medical College & Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
April 20, 2011
Revised
May 15, 2011
Accepted
June 5, 2011
Published
June 28, 2011
Abstract

Background and Objective: Health status of rural females is the most neglected in India. Hepatitis B is one of the highly infectious and sexually transmitted diseases which have a direct impact on the health of rural females as well on their siblings and family. So this study was undertaken to know the burden of Hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection in rural females so a prevention strategy can be made to curtail such dreaded infection in rural society. Method: A total number of 5035 female subjects of different age ranging from neonate to 90 years were grouped in 8 different groups designated as A to H. They were screened for detecting HBs Ag both by Rapid Diagnostic tests and ELISA technique Results: Maximum number of subjects belonged to age group 21-30 yrs of group C, followed by group D(31-40yrs) and B(11-20 yrs). Of 5035 subjects, 256(5.08%) were positive for HBsAg. The positivity was maximum in both the extremes of life, 7.8%% & 21.9 t & 19.5% percent respectively. In other group the HBs Antigen positivity varied from 2.5 to 5.8 percent. Interpretation and Conclusion: The high incidence of Hepatitis B Viral infection clearly reflects the uneducated and neglected health status of rural females. Prevention strategy and education can reduce the further transmission and thereby reducing morbidity and mortality with HBV infection

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B is a common but also serious infectious disease of the liver because of its severe pathological consequences like chronic hepatic insufficiency, cirrhosis of liver and hepatocellular carcinoma. Infections usually occurs during early childhood, may be asymptomatic but often leads to chronic carrier state and are capable of transmitting disease for many years. More than 2000 million people are infected with HBV at some time of their life (WHO 2002) [1]. In spite of such serious consequences HBV has been over shadowed by HIV, which it deserves and as a result HBV has taken back seat in the mind of medical administration all over the world specially in India, but the virus continues to play its natural history of disease. In India many reports are available about the incidence of HBV in general urban population. In females the carrier rate of HBsAg has been studied only from cities and that too in mothers or from tribal population, but there is no report available in literature about incidence of HBV in general female population of rural India. Inspite of the fact that rural females are most neglected community of Indian society, irrespective of cast and religion. They have to carry out all the household and field work till they are completely bed ridden. Maximum they get is medical consultation from unregistered medical practitioners or quacks. The present work has been undertaken with a view to study the health status of rural female population in relation to systemic infections like Hepatitis B which affects future life of the subjects. The incidence of HBV was studied in the general female population among different age groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present work was carried out in Department of Microbiology Santosh Medical College & Hospital, Ghaziabad from September 2006 to March 2010.This institute drain large rural population of western U.P. including Meerut, Dadri, Hapur, Bulandshar, Dhollana, Modinagar . Samples were collected from patients both from outpatient & indoor department. The test was carried out by commercially available kits including ELISA (S.D. make 3.0) & rapid (hepacard –immunopak and Viruchek-orchid) . Positive sample were stored at - 20° C for further study.

 

 

Table 1: HBsAg positivity in different age group

Group

Age Group (In Years)

Number of Subjects

%

HBsAg Positivity

% Positivity

Maximum Age

Minimum Age

A

0-10

64

1.3

5

7.8

1 month

10 years

B

11-20

787

15.6

34

4.3

11 year

20 year

C

21-30

2590

51.5

108

4.2

21 year

30 year

D

31-40

863

17.1

39

4.5

31 year

40 year

E

41-50

357

7.1

23

6.4

41 year

50 year

F

51-60

203

4

11

5.4

51 year

60 year

G

61-70

114

2.3

25

21.9

61 year

65 year

H

≥71

57

1.1

11

19.3

70 year

90 year

               

 

Table 2: Showing HBV positivity in female Population report by different investigators

Year

Investigator

Place of study

Sample size

No. of Positivity

Percentage

1980

Khatri etal

Bombay

1276

8

0.62

1989

Biswas et al

Chandigarh

1000

23

2.3

1991

Panda et al

Delhi

8431

191

2.26

1992

Gupta et al

Chandigarh

2337

58

2.48

1996

Sharma et al

Aligarh

157

16

10.19

1998

Prakash et al

Delhi

1112

106

9.5

2001

Abbas et al

Delhi

6910

70

1.01

2004

Varghese et al

Delhi

6341

52

0.82

2004

Sahani et al

Delhi

987

22

2.22

2005

Chakravorty et al

Delhi

400

17

4.25

2005

Banerjee et al

Kolkata

400

15

3.75

2012

Pande and Omar(present study)

Rural western

5035

256

5.084

 

OBSERVATION

In the present study 5035 female subjects grouped in 8 designated group A to H were studied for the presence of HBsAg (Table1). This included subject of youngest neonate and old of 90 years. Maximum no. of subjects belonged to age group C (21-30years), 2590 (51.5%) followed by group D (31-40years) 863(17.1%) and B (11-20years) 787(15.6%). Positivity for HBsAg was maximum in group G (61-70years) 21.9% and group H (71yrs and above) 19.5%. The youngest positive case in present study was a neonate and oldest subject of 90 years old lady.

 

DISCUSSION

Five thousand and thirty five female subjects belonging to rural population of western U.P. ,ranging between age of neonate to 90 years were screened for presence of HBsAg. Out of 5035 subjects screened for HBsAg, 256(5.084%) were found to be positive. The youngest subject positive for HBsAg was a neonate and oldest lady was of 90 years age. The maximum HBSAg positivity was found in the oldest group i.e. (61-70years) and group H (71 years and above) and it was 21.9% and 19.3% respectively. In the age group C (21-30 years) and Group D (31-40 years) to which highest numbers of subjects were screened showed a positivity of 4.2% and 4.5% respectively. Group C and D age groups most important for rural ladies not only because of its sexually active age group but also because they have shoulder full responsibilities of house, children, and husbands and in laws. These age groups are also important because mother to child transmission of HBsAg may also occur if the female is positive for HBsAg and later this will increase the problems of rural female and family both mentally and economically. Incidentally there is increase in the incidence of HBsAg positivity after 40 years also. There is no report available in literature about incidence of HBsAg positivity in rural population of India. Various Investigators have detected HBV markers in mothers of urban population or in tribal population but not in rural population. Reports available from neighboring areas like Delhi [2-6], Aligarh [7] and Chandigarh [4]. The reports from Delhi itself showed wide variation about HBV positivity ranging from 0.82% in the study of Varghese et al(2004) [12], to 9.5% by Prakash et al (1998) [8] Table 2. Other Investigators have reported figures ranging between the above two extremes, Abbas et al (2001) 1 found HBV positivity -1.01%, Panda et al (1991) [7] 2.26%, Shahini et al (2004) [10] 2.22% in the mothers only. From Aligarh Sharma et al (1996) [11] reported positivity of 10.19% among mothers. In contrast from Chandigarh, Biswas et a l(1989) [3] reported 2.3% positivity in 1000 cases while Gupta et al (1996) [5] reported 2,48% of positivity in a study in their 2337 subjects. From Bombay (now Mumbai) Khatri et al (1980) [6] reported only 0.62% and From Kolkata Banerjee et al (2003) [2] reported 2.81 % positivity. In the present study the HBV positivity in rural population in females of western U.P. is nearer and slightly on higher side to those reported from studies of urban population of Delhi by Chakravorty et al (1997)-4.25% and Banerjee et al -3.75%, but these data are from urban population who are educated and relatively better of economically in contrast to rural population which is by and large uneducated and relatively poor. Higher percentage of positivity clearly reflects the status of rural population. Concluding, a good vaccination strategy, information and education may will definitely reduce the incidence of HBsAg positivity in them and thereby have a positive impact on female health status of rural India.

REFERENCES
  1. Abass F, Thomas RD, Rajkumar A, Gupta N, Puliyel JM. Controlling perinatally acquired hepatitis B. Indian J Pediatr. 2001; 68: 365.
  2. Banerjee A,Chakravarty R,Mondal PN,Chakraborty MS.Hepatitis B virus genotype D infection among antenatal patients attending a maternity hospital in Calcutta, India:assessment of infectivity status.Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005; 36: 203-6.
  3. Biswas SC,Gupta I,Ganguly NK,Chawla Y,Dilawari JB.Prevalance of hepatitis B surface antigen in pregnant mothers and its perinatal transmission. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1989; 83: 698-700.
  4. Chakravarti A, Rawat D, Jain M.A study on the perinatal transmission of the hepatitis B virus. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005: 23: 128-30. 5. Gupta I, Sehgal A, Sehgal R, Ganguly NK.Vertical transmission of hepatitis B in north India. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol.1992; 36(3): 263-7.
  5. Khatri JV, Kulkarni KV, Vaishnav PR, Merchant SM.Vertical transmission of hepatitis B. Indian Pediatr 1980; 17: 957-62.
  6. Panda SK, Ramesh R, Rao KV, Gupta A, Zuckerman AJ, Nayak NC.Comparative evaluation of the immunogenicity of yeast-derived (recombinant) and plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine in infants. J Med Virol. 1991; 35(4): 297-302
  7. Prakash C, Sharma RS, Bhatia R, Verghese T, Datta KK. Prevalence of North India of hepatitis B carrier state amongst pregnant women. Southeast. 1998; 29(1): 80-4.
  8. Qamer S, Shahab T, Alam S, Malik A, Afzal K.Agespecific prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen in pediatric population of Aligarh, North India. Indian J Pediatr. 2004; 71(11): 965-7.
  9. Sahni M, Jindal K, Abraham N, Aruldas K, Puliyel JM.Hepatitis B immunization: cost calculation in a community-based study in India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan-Feb; 23(1): 16-8.
  10. Sharma R,Malik A,Rattan A,Iraqi A, Maheshwari V,Dhawan R.Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Pregnant Women and Its Transmission to Infants.J Trop Pediatr. 1996; 42(6): 352-4.
  11. Batham A,Narula D, Toteja T, Sreenivas V., Puliyel J M. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence of Hepatitis B in India. Indian Pediatrics. 2007; 44: 663-674.
  12. Weekly epidemiological record 2 october 2009, 84th year http://www.who.int/wer Available from http://www.who.int/wer/2009/wer8440.pdf
  13. H.O. Hepatitis B. 2002: 3-75.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Study of Lactate Albumin Ratio and Its Relation with qSOFA Score in Sepsis Patients in Medical Intensive care Unit at Tertiary Care Hospital
...
Published: 04/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
The Role of Ankle Mobility and Tendoachilles in Causing Varicose Veins
...
Published: 04/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Thyroid Profile and Molecular Response in Patients of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI)
Published: 04/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Prevalence of Rifampicin Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis Among Presumptive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in West Bengal, India
...
Published: 04/08/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.