Background: Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture recorded in children, accounting for approximately 60% of fractures around the elbow and 13-15% of all pediatric fractures [1]. These fractures are prevalent in the non-dominant hand between the ages of 5 and 8, with boys being more afflicted than girls Objectives: To evaluate the Functional outcome of type 3 supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children treated by open reduction and internal fixation by k-wires. Material & Methods: Study Design: Hospital-based prospective study. Study area: The study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics. Study Period: February 2024 to July 2024. Study population: All the children with Gartland type III fracture who presented to the orthopaedic outpatient or casualty. Sample size: The study consisted of a total of 20 subjects. Sampling Technique: Simple Random technique. Results: Excellent result was obtained in 54% of the patients, good in 30% and fair in 10% and poor result in 6% of the patients. Complications such as nerve injuries, vascular injuries, infections were seen in the study which healed following short course of the treatment. 3 patients had cubitusvarus and 6 patients had flexion loss on follow-up study. Conclusion: Posterior open reduction of childhood supracondylar fractures does not result in significant loss of elbow mobility and should not be avoided on this basis. In a country with high hospitalization expenditures and congested wards, operational treatment of these fractures allows for rapid patient turnover. This has significant economic implications for a developing country like ours.
Supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture recorded in children, accounting for approximately 60% of fractures around the elbow and 13-15% of all pediatric fractures [1]. These fractures are prevalent in the non-dominant hand between the ages of 5 and 8, with boys being more afflicted than girls [2-4]. These fractures are categorised into three categories according to their displacement. The fragmented portion is not displaced in type I, displaced with intact posterior cortex in type II, entirely displaced in type III, and completely displaced with periosteal stripping in type IV [5].
Complications arise as a result of intrinsic fracture instability, proximity to the brachial artery, three major nerves of the upper extremity, inadequate radiographs, poor interpretation of reduction and modality of maintenance of reduction, and, finally, patient compliance with therapy. The treatment goal for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children is anatomic reduction. Open reduction is recommended if closed reduction cannot achieve the desired anatomic reduction. This can be done without increasing the risk of problems.Fractures that do not respond to closed reduction are surgically treated with open reduction and pinning. Open reduction can be performed using anterior, posterior, medial, or lateral surgical techniques [6].
Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is one of the rare fractures that, when treated appropriately, may not throw the surgeon's reputation into question. Still, when treated incorrectly, it will undoubtedly bring shame to even the most well-known surgeon.
There is little debate on how to manage an undisplaced or slightly displaced fracture, however, there are several options for treating a completely displaced fracture. Others have developed blind pining following reduction or pinning under X-ray control. Some even advise accepting an inadequate closed reduction and performing an osteotomy to fix the deformity later. However, severe treatment, including surgery management, is frequently indicated in the elbow region. It is no longer true that a supracondylar fracture is not bad.
To evaluate the Functional outcome of type 3 supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children treated by open reduction and internal fixation by k-wires.
Study Design: Hospital-based prospective study.
Study area: The study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics.
Study Period: February 2024 to July 2024.
Study population: All the children with Gartland type III fracture who presented to the orthopaedic outpatient or casualty.
Sample size: The study consisted of a total of 20 subjects.
Sampling Technique: Simple Random technique.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Ethical consideration: Institutional Ethical committee permission was taken before the commencement of the study.
Study tools and Data collection procedure:
A detailed history of the mode of injury was obtained from the parents as well as the patient. Out of the twenty cases, eight patients (40%) sustained fractures due to a fall while playing and the remaining twelve patients due to a fall from the cycle. Most of the cases had a history of falling on outstretched hands. All patients presented with pain, swelling, “S” shaped deformity of the lower arm and inability to move the affected elbow. On examination, all patients had diffuse swelling all around the elbow and puckering of the skin was seen at the site of fracture in 4 cases. All patients had shortening of the arm as compared to the normal side. The average period from injury to presentation was ten hours, the mean age being 8.8 years. There were 16 boys and 4 girls. 14 patients presented with involvement onthe left side and 6 patients on the right side.
Associated injuries included:
The remaining thirteen cases were taken up for primary open reduction and internal fixation, the reasons being.
Collected data entered in the Microsoft Excel sheet. Data analysis was done by SPSS software Version 20. Continuous variables were categorised as either normal or abnormal and the patients in either category were reported as proportion. Pearson's chi-square test also known as the Chi-square test for independence and the Chi-square test of association was used to detect if there was any relationship between two categorical variables. ANOVA was used to compare the two means. A p-value of 0.05 is taken as significant.
TABLE 1: FLYNN’S CRITERIA
Ratings |
CosmeticfactorCarryingangleloss(degrees) |
Functional factorMovementsloss(degrees) |
Excellent |
0to5 |
0to5 |
Good |
6to 10 |
6to 10 |
Fair |
11to15 |
11to15 |
Poor |
>15 |
>15 |
ResultsInOurSeries |
||
ResultingRate |
||
Satisfactory |
Excellent |
11cases(54%) |
|
Good |
6cases(30%) |
Fair |
2cases(10%) |
|
Unsatisfactory |
Poor |
1case (6%) |
Failures:
1 case (6%) had poor results, which is considered as failure. This case had a limitation of elbow movement of more than 20O flexion, and cubitusvarus of 20O, associated with medial pillar comminution.
Table 2: Type of Displaced Fractures
ExtensionType |
FlexionType |
Total |
19 |
1 |
20 |
Table 3: Type of displacement
Postero-medial |
Postero-lateral |
posterior |
6 |
11 |
2 |