Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
9 Views
1 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 9 (September, 2025) | Pages 203 - 207
Association Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cutaneous Infections: Insights from a Tertiary Care Hospital
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Government Medical College and General Hospital, Rajanna Siricilla, Telangana, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL), Government Medical College and General Hospital, Rajanna Siricilla, Telangana, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Aug. 13, 2025
Revised
Aug. 21, 2025
Accepted
Sept. 2, 2025
Published
Sept. 9, 2025
Abstract

Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder frequently complicated by cutaneous infections due to impaired immunity, poor glycemic control, and long disease duration. Understanding the prevalence and spectrum of dermatological manifestations in diabetics provides insights for early diagnosis and prevention. Aim: To evaluate the association between T2DM and cutaneous infections among patients attending a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients with T2DM. Detailed demographic data, duration of diabetes, and glycemic status (HbA1c) were recorded. Dermatological examination was performed to identify cutaneous infections. Data were analyzed, and associations were tested using chi-square statistics. Results: The mean age of participants was 54.6 ± 11.2 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. Poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) was observed in 68% of patients. Cutaneous infections were detected in 74% of cases, with fungal infections being most common (40%), followed by bacterial (22%) and viral infections (8%). Mixed infections were observed in 4%. Patients with poor glycemic control demonstrated significantly higher prevalence of infections (85%) compared to those with adequate control (50%) (p < 0.05). A longer duration of diabetes was also strongly associated with infections, rising from 58% in patients with < 5 years of disease to 88% in those with > 10 years (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Cutaneous infections are highly prevalent among patients with T2DM, particularly in those with poor glycemic control and long-standing disease. Early recognition and strict glycemic management may reduce dermatological morbidity in this population.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a major global health problem, characterized by persistent hyperglycemia and metabolic disturbances, and its prevalence continues to rise worldwide, particularly in India, which is recognized as a leading epicenter of the epidemic [1]. The disease predisposes patients to a broad spectrum of complications, among which cutaneous manifestations are both frequent and clinically significant. Indeed, the skin is often described as a “mirror of internal disease,” with dermatological changes serving as early indicators of metabolic dysregulation [2].

 

Cutaneous infections occur commonly in patients with diabetes due to several pathophysiological mechanisms, including impaired neutrophil function, reduced cellular immunity, microangiopathy, and compromised skin barrier integrity [3]. Poor glycemic control and longer disease duration further enhance susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens [4]. Among the various infections, fungal diseases—particularly candidiasis and dermatophytosis—are most frequently reported, followed by bacterial and viral infections [2,4]. If unrecognized or inadequately treated, these infections may contribute substantially to morbidity in affected individuals.

 

Although multiple studies have highlighted the dermatological burden in diabetes, the reported prevalence and spectrum of cutaneous infections differ across populations, influenced by demographic, environmental, and healthcare-related factors [5]. Context-specific data from Indian tertiary care centers are therefore valuable for guiding clinicians in timely recognition and management of these conditions.

 

The present study was conducted to evaluate the association between T2DM and cutaneous infections, to document their spectrum, and to analyze the influence of glycemic status and disease duration on infection prevalence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Setting
This was a hospital-based cross-sectional observational study conducted jointly by the Departments of General Medicine and Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL), Government Medical College and Government General Hospital, Rajanna Siricilla, Telangana, over a period of six months from January 2025 to June 2025.

 

Study Population
A total of 100 patients diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, attending the outpatient and inpatient services of the hospital during the study period, were included after obtaining informed consent. Both males and females aged 18 years and above were eligible.

 

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with established diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus based on American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.

 

Willingness to participate in the study and provide informed consent.

 

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus or gestational diabetes.
  • Individuals on long-term systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Patients with known HIV infection or other immunocompromised states.
  • Those with incomplete clinical or laboratory data.

 

Data Collection
Demographic details (age, sex), duration of diabetes, and history of glycemic control were recorded. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were obtained to classify patients into controlled (< 7%) and poorly controlled (≥ 7%) categories. Each participant underwent a thorough dermatological examination by a dermatologist to identify the presence and type of cutaneous infections. In suspected cases, laboratory confirmation was performed using potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount, Gram staining, culture, or Tzanck smear, wherever appropriate.

 

Statistical Analysis
Data were compiled and analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and frequencies with percentages for categorical variables. The chi-square test was applied to evaluate the association between glycemic control, duration of diabetes, and prevalence of cutaneous infections. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

Ethical Considerations:
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Government Medical College, Rajanna Siricilla. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the participants was 54.6 ± 11.2 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.3:1. More than one-third of patients (38%) had diabetes for over 10 years, and the majority (68%) demonstrated poor glycemic control with HbA1c ≥ 7% (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of the Study Population (n = 100)

Variable

Category

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Age (years)

Mean ± SD

54.6 ± 11.2

Gender

Male

57

57%

 

Female

43

43%

Duration of Diabetes

< 5 years

28

28%

 

5–10 years

34

34%

 

> 10 years

38

38%

Glycemic Control (HbA1c)

< 7% (controlled)

32

32%

 

≥ 7% (poor control)

68

68%

 

Overall, 74% of patients presented with at least one cutaneous infection, while 26% showed no dermatological manifestations (Table 2).

 

Table 2. Prevalence of Cutaneous Infections in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Status

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Any cutaneous infection

74

74%

No infection

26

26%

Figure 1. Prevalence of Cutaneous Infections in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

 

Among those affected, fungal infections were the most common (40%), with candidiasis (22%) and dermatophytosis (18%) predominating. Bacterial infections accounted for 22%, including furunculosis (12%), cellulitis (6%), and erysipelas (4%). Viral infections were less frequent, with herpes zoster (5%) and verruca vulgaris (3%) recorded. Mixed infections, defined as the presence of two or more concurrent types, were noted in 4% of cases (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Spectrum of Cutaneous Infections (n = 74)

Infection Type

Subtype

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Fungal infections

Candidiasis

22

22%

 

Dermatophytosis

18

18%

Bacterial infections

Furunculosis

12

12%

 

Cellulitis

6

6%

 

Erysipelas

4

4%

Viral infections

Herpes zoster

5

5%

 

Verruca vulgaris

3

3%

Mixed infections

≥ 2 concurrent infections

4

4%

Figure 2. Spectrum of Cutaneous Infections in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

 

When glycemic control was considered, patients with poor HbA1c levels (≥ 7%) exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of cutaneous infections (85%) compared to those with controlled diabetes (50%, p < 0.05). Similarly, infection rates increased with the duration of diabetes, ranging from 58% in patients with < 5 years of disease to 88% in those with > 10 years’ duration, indicating a strong association between chronicity and infection risk (p < 0.05) (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Association of Cutaneous Infections with Glycemic Control and Duration of Diabetes

Variable

Category

Infection Present (%)

p-value

HbA1c level

< 7% (n = 32)

16 (50%)

< 0.05*

 

≥ 7% (n = 68)

58 (85%)

 

Duration of Diabetes

< 5 years (n = 28)

16 (58%)

< 0.05*

 

5–10 years (n = 34)

24 (71%)

 

 

> 10 years (n = 38)

34 (88%)

 

*Significant association (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

In this study, cutaneous infections were documented in 74% of patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), confirming the considerable dermatological burden in this population. Fungal infections predominated, particularly candidiasis and dermatophytosis, followed by bacterial and viral infections. These findings align with previous literature describing fungal infections as the most frequent dermatological manifestations in diabetic patients, owing to hyperglycemia-driven impairment of innate immunity and altered cutaneous microenvironments that favor fungal proliferation [6].

 

The strong association between poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%) and higher prevalence of infections (85%) highlights the central role of metabolic regulation in maintaining skin health. Similar associations between uncontrolled diabetes and increased susceptibility to candidal and bacterial infections have been emphasized in both clinical and review studies [7,8]. Chronic hyperglycemia impairs neutrophil chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and cellular immunity, thereby predisposing patients to recurrent or persistent cutaneous infections [9].

Duration of diabetes was also identified as a significant determinant, with infection prevalence rising from 58% in patients with less than five years of disease to 88% in those with more than ten years. This observation parallels earlier Indian and international studies, which demonstrated that cumulative metabolic dysregulation and microvascular complications increase skin vulnerability over time [8,10].

The predominance of fungal over bacterial and viral infections in this study may be influenced by climatic conditions, antibiotic usage, and hygiene practices, factors that have similarly been reported in large Indian cohorts [11,12]. While bacterial infections such as furunculosis and cellulitis were less common, they remain clinically important due to their potential for systemic spread. Viral infections, although relatively infrequent, still warrant attention as markers of compromised immunity.

 

Strengths of the study include its systematic dermatological evaluation and laboratory confirmation of suspicious cases. Nonetheless, some limitations should be acknowledged: being a single-center study with a modest sample size, the findings may not be fully generalizable. Moreover, the six-month duration did not account for seasonal variability in infection patterns.

 

Overall, our results corroborate the view that cutaneous infections in T2DM are not trivial complications but important clinical indicators of underlying glycemic control and chronicity. Integrating routine dermatological evaluation into diabetic care, along with patient education on hygiene and strict metabolic regulation, could significantly reduce morbidity and improve quality of life for these patients.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the high prevalence of cutaneous infections among patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, with nearly three-fourths of individuals affected. Fungal infections, particularly candidiasis and dermatophytosis, were most frequently encountered, followed by bacterial and viral infections. The occurrence of these infections was significantly associated with poor glycemic control and longer duration of diabetes, underscoring the importance of strict metabolic regulation in reducing dermatological morbidity. These findings emphasize that skin manifestations are not only common complications but also valuable clinical markers of underlying disease status. Early recognition and integrated management may improve quality of life and prevent severe sequelae in diabetic patients.

REFERENCES
  1. Tirmizi SS, Zulfiqar M, Moosa E, Rasool R, Shami S, Alam A, et al. Association of dermatological manifestations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with respect to duration of diabetes. Cureus. 2025 Jul 24;17(7):e88681. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88681. PMID: 40861643; PMCID: PMC12374756.
  2. Vâță D, Stanciu DE, Temelie-Olinici D, Porumb-Andrese E, Tarcău BM, Grecu VB, et al. Cutaneous manifestations associated with diabetes mellitus—a retrospective study. Diseases. 2023 Aug 18;11(3):106. doi: 10.3390/diseases11030106. PMID: 37606477; PMCID: PMC10443279.
  3. Edwards E, Yosipovitch G. Skin manifestations of diabetes mellitus. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. [Updated 2025 Mar 21; cited 2025 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481900/
  4. Chen VY, Siegfried LG, Tomic-Canic M, Stone RC, Pastar I. Cutaneous changes in diabetic patients: primed for aberrant healing? Wound Repair Regen. 2023 Sep-Oct;31(5):700–712. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13108. Epub 2023 Jul 19. PMID: 37365017; PMCID: PMC10966665.
  5. Abu-Ashour W, Twells L, Valcour J, Randell A, Donnan J, Howse P, et al. The association between diabetes mellitus and incident infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 May 27;5(1):e000336. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000336. PMID: 28761647; PMCID: PMC5530269.
  6. Mendes AL, Miot HA, Haddad V Jr. Diabetes mellitus and the skin. An Bras Dermatol. 2017 Jan-Feb;92(1):8–20. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175514. PMID: 28225950; PMCID: PMC5312172.
  7. Zhou K, Lansang MC. Diabetes mellitus and infection. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. [Updated 2024 Jun 30; cited 2025 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK569326/
  8. Chatterjee N, Chattopadhyay C, Sengupta N, Das C, Sarma N, Pal SK. An observational study of cutaneous manifestations in diabetes mellitus in a tertiary care hospital of Eastern India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Mar;18(2):217–20. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.129115. PMID: 24741520; PMCID: PMC3987274.
  9. Ly L, Vo KL, Cruel AC, Shubrook JH. Dermatological manifestations of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Diabetology. 2025;6(3):18. doi: 10.3390/diabetology6030018.
  10. Man MQ, Wakefield JS, Mauro TM, Elias PM. Alterations in epidermal function in type 2 diabetes: implications for the management of this disease. J Diabetes. 2022 Sep;14(9):586–95. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13303. Epub 2022 Aug 31. PMID: 36043448; PMCID: PMC9512766.
  11. Ragunatha S, Anitha B, Inamadar AC, Palit A, Devarmani SS. Cutaneous disorders in 500 diabetic patients attending diabetic clinic. Indian J Dermatol. 2011 Mar;56(2):160–4. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.80409. PMID: 21716540; PMCID: PMC3108514.
  12. Vudayana K, Sudheer K, Chintada D. A study of cutaneous manifestations in diabetes mellitus patients in tertiary care centre. Int J Res Dermatol [Internet]. 2019 Jul 24 [cited 2025 Sep 9];5(3):571–4. Available from: https://www.ijord.com/index.php/ijord/article/view/656
Recommended Articles
Research Article
To Compare the Age-Adapted Qsofa (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and Pews (Pediatric Early Warning Score) in Children Admitted to Picu in Tertiary Care Centre
...
Published: 09/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Freshly Collected Amniotic Membrane Therapy in Chronic Non-Healing Ulcers: A Regenerative Approach to Wound Healing Mechanisms and Vascular Regeneration
...
Published: 10/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Spectrum of Benign and Malignant Laryngeal Lesions in Patients Presenting with Hoarseness of Voice: A Cross-Sectional Study
Published: 08/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of Superficial Fungal Skin Infections on Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh
...
Published: 01/09/2011
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.