Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
112 Views
8 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 14 Issue 5 (Sept - Oct, 2024) | Pages 445 - 449
Association of Liver Fibrosis based on Transient Elastography and Quantitative HBsAg Levels in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients
 ,
1
M.D. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Assam Medical College & Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam, India
2
Postgraduate Student, Department of General Medicine, Assam Medical College & Hospital, Dibrugarh, Assam. India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Sept. 15, 2024
Revised
Sept. 20, 2024
Accepted
Sept. 30, 2024
Published
Oct. 7, 2024
Abstract

Background: The data of lower quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level were associated with more severe liver fibrosis in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. This study aimed to analyze correlation between liver fibrosis based on transient elastography and quantitative HBsAg levels in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 52 treatment-naive HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. Liver fibrosis was measured using transient elastography, and quantitative HBsAg level was measured using automated Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay. Results: Quantitative HBsAg levels were highest in the F1 group, followed by F2, F3 and lowest in the F4 group. A strong negative correlation between transient elastography and quantitative HBsAg level was revealed in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients (r=-0.706, p=0.000). Quantitative HBsAg levels were found to be higher in the immune-tolerant phase which liver fibrosis was minimal compared to the immune clearance phase which liver fibrosis was more severe. Patients with more severe liver fibrosis showed lower quantitative HBsAg levels. Conclusion: We found a negative correlation between liver fibrosis based on transient elastography and quantitative HBsAg levels in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

The high incidence, natural history and chronicity of infections with the symptoms of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) tend to be severely affected as a result of not optimal treatment. Indonesia has a moderate to high hepatitis B endemicity. CHB is determined by seropositivity of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) of more than 6 months [1]. Among 2-6% of adults, 30%-60% of young children and 90% of infants (< 1 year of age) are diagnosed with CHB infections [2]. In North-East India, the number of people with hepatitis B infection are estimated 9.9%, which prevalence of HBsAg positive in Assam is significantly lower than in North-East region of India [3, 4]. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B infection is a dynamic process which can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBeAg-positive CHB infection characterized by varying levels of ALT, HBV DNA, qHBsAg, and liver fibrosis. HBeAg-positive CHB infection is early phase and associated with more active liver inflammation and high risk for being hepatocellular carcinoma.

 

Early detection of significant liver disease can improve patient outcomes [5, 6]. Hepatitis B is a viral infection that has the potency to become a chronic infection and causes serious complications such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [7]. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection persist within nuclei of infected hepatocytes as covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) minichromosomes which acts as a template for the transcription of viral genes. Data presented imply that a depletion of cccDNA by cell death may be clarified [8]. HBV spreads through blood, sperm fluid, or other body fluids from patients infected with HBV [9]. HBV is percutaneously spread by contact from patients with Hepatitis B to contaminate blood or other body fluids [10].

 

Liver fibrosis is a condition that liver cell damage is replace with connective tissue, so it is suggested that in liver fibrosis the number of healthy liver cells decrease, nuclei of infected hepatocytes reduce, consequently cccDNA will also reduce. HBsAg is generally called a diagnosis of HBV infection, containing the virus’ protein envelope. Quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) can reflect the concentration and transcription activity of cccDNA. Quantitative HBsAg examination was also reported to correlate with HBV DNA and cccDNA [11, 12]. Quantification HBsAg has been recognized as valuable for monitoring the natural history of chronic hepatitis and predicting treatment outcome [13].

 

The main pathogens that contribute to cirrhosis are liver fibrosis. Fibrosis in the early stages is also necessary to identify. Liver biopsy is a gold standard to diagnose the degree of liver fibrosis [14]. The invasive procedure and the possibility of severe complications are however limited. A variety of non-invasive methods for predicting liver fibrosis have therefore been developed. Several studies have suggested that transient elastography can be used to assess liver fibrosis, including to assess liver fibrosis in CHB infection [15]. Quantitative HBsAg level is reported to correlate with liver fibrosis and may represent liver damage [16]. Several studies have shown a negative correlation between liver fibrosis with quantitative HBsAg levels in the HBeAg-positive CHB [17–19]. Whereas another research showed high quantitative HBsAg levels indicating more severe fibrosis [20].

 

There were limited studies about correlation of liver fibrosis with quantitative HBsAg levels in India, so we conducted this study. In this study, it is expected that quantitative HBsAg examination can be used as a consideration for examining liver fibrosis, especially by using transient elastography, that might be useful for determining treatment strategies.

MATERIAL & METHODS

This retrospective study included eligible consecutive patients with HBsAg positive for the period of Jan-Jul 2024 in tertiary hospital of Department of Medicine, Assam Medical College, Gauhati. The inclusion criteria were: (i) age 19-59 years; (ii) HBeAg-positive. The exclusion criteria were: (i) treatment with antiviral therapy, (ii) infection with hepatitis C, HIV (iii) Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/NAFLD, (iv) alcoholic, (v) autoimmune hepatititis, (vi) hepatocellular carcinoma, (vii) decompensated liver cirrhosis, (viii) diabetes mellitus, (ix) corticosteroid/immunosupresant agent.

 

Liver fibrosis measurements were using transient elastography by fibroscan (Echosens, Paris, France), the results in kilopascal (kPa). Classification of fibrosis was based on: F1 (5-8.0 kPa); F2 (8.1-10.9 kPa); F3 (11-18.1 kPa) and F4 (≥18.2 kPa). Quantitative HBsAg levels were measured using automated Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay (Sysmex, Japan) with a diagnostic range of 0.03 – 2500 IU/mL.

 

All data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21 (SPSS version 21). Patients’ characteristics are presented as mean with standard deviation or median with minimum and maximum range for continuous variables. The number of subjects for categorical data are presented as percentage. Spearman’s correlations were used to evaluate the correlation between liver fibrosis and qHBsAg levels. The p values were two-tailed, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULT

Patients’ Characteristics

The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of 50 patients (30 males, 20 females) was 32±10.812 years. Median ALT was 50.5 IU/L (range 20-210 IU/L).

 

Table 1: Patients’ characteristics

Characteristics

Subject(n=50)

 

n(%)

Mean±SD

Median

Min-max

Age (years)

 

32±10.812

28.5

19-59

Sex

 

 

 

 

Male

30(60%)

 

 

 

Female

20(40%)

 

 

 

AST(IU/L)

 

40.31±26.079

33

14-143

ALT(IU/L)

 

67.63±46.514

50.5

20-210

Hb(g/dL)

 

14.431±1.801

14.4

9.1-17.1

WBC(/uL)

 

7162.19±1132.8

6945

4650-10100

PLT(103/uL)

 

307.46±79.471

255.5

142-421

Albumin(g/dL)

 

4.384±0.335

4.2

3.6-5

BUN(mg/dL)

 

10.72±4.567

10

6-26

SK(mg/dL)

 

0.836±0.132

0.8

0.6-1.2

 

Table 2 shows that the median fibrosis value using transient elastography is 7.05 kPa (range 5.1-33.4 kPa). Twenty patients (40%) were classified as F1, Ten patients (20%) as F2, Ten patients (20%) as F3, and Ten patients (20%) as F4.

 

Table 2: Liver fibrosis based on transient elastography

Variables

Subject(n=50)

 

n(%)

Mean±SD

Median

Min-max

P value

 

Transient

elastography (kPa)

 

9.328±6.319

7.05

5.1-33.4

 

 

Liver fibrosis

 

 

 

 

 

 

F1

20(40%)

6.114±1.086

5.9

5.1-7.9

 

 

F2

10(20%)

9.7±0.418

9.8

9-10.1

 

 

F3

10(20%)

13.25±2.05

13.25

11.8-14.7

 

 

F4

10(20%)

23.775±6.491

21.15

19.4-33.4

 

 

 

In this study, if qHBsAg level was >3.4 log10 IU/mL, we analysed as 3.4 log10 IU/mL. The median qHBsAg level was 3.397 log10 IU/mL (range 2.32 log10 IU/mL – >3.4 log10 IU/mL). Quantitative HBsAg level was highest in F1 with median value of qHBsAg level 3.397 log10 IU/mL (range 3.397 log10 IU/mL – >3.4 log10 IU/mL).

 

Table 3: Quantitative HBsAg level in fibrosis liver

 

Transient elastography

 

r

P value

Quantitative HBsAg

-0.881

<0.0001

Significant

 

Quantitative HBsAg level was lowest in F4 with median value qHBsAg level 2.725 log10 IU/mL (range 2.32 log10 IU/mL – 2.95 log10 IU/mL), as seen in Table 2.

 

Correlation between liver fibrosis using transient elastography and qHBsAg level

There was strong negative correlation between liver fibrosis using transient elastography and quantitative HBsAg levels (r = -0.881, p <0.0001; Table 3). The results showed the more severe the fibrosis, the lower the qHBsAg level (Figure 1).

DISCUSSION

In HBeAg-positive CHB patients (r = -0881 and p = <0.0001), this analysis showed a strong, negative association between liver fibrosis dependent on transient elastography with quantitative HBsAg. The previous study reported a negative correlation between transient elastography with quantitative HBsAg levels (r = - 0.576 and p <0.001) [19]. Quantitative HBsAg level describes the amount and transcription activity of cccDNA in hepatocytes. Thus, quantitative HBsAg can provide information about disease activity above an estimated viral replication [21]. Elimination of cccDNA is affected by the cell death of infected hepatocytes [8]. The more severe the fibrosis, the number of hepatocytes decreases, cccDNA decreases so that the level of quantitative HBsAg is low. The previous research presents a cross-sectional study of 103 patients showing different results, high quantitative HBsAg levels indicating more severe fibrosis [20]. This is likely because the analysis did not distinguish between HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative groups.

 

The number of male subjects in this study were larger than female (60% vs 40%) that were consistent with other previous study [18, 19, 22]. The demographics in Southeast Asia showed a higher HBsAg positive prevalence rate for men than for women (10% vs 6%) [23]. The mechanism underlying sex differences related to hepatitis B virus infection remains unclear. It is suspected that mechanism of sex differences is related to the presence of sexual hormone factors, gender behavior, and environmental factors [24]. This study showed that the average age of the subjects was young which also consistent with the previous reports. In accordance with the natural course of hepatitis B infection, young age is more often found in the HBeAg-positive CHB. In this study, the average ALT was 67.63±46.514 IU/L. In a previous study the average ALT was 32.3±17.7 IU/L [19]. The previous research also found an ALT of 168.3±220 IU/L [22]. This variation in ALT values is influenced by differences in inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and phase of chronic hepatitis B infection in the study subjects. ALT levels varied in the HBeAg-positive group. In the immune tolerant phase, the ALT levels are normal, whereas in the immune reactive phase ALT levels increase [6].

 

In this study, quantitative HBsAg levels werehighest in the F1 group, followed by F2, F3 andlowest in the F4 group. This is consistent with the previous study, patients with fibrosis <F2 had higher levels of quantitative HBsAg than ≥F2(4.4±0.8 log10 IU/mL vs 3.5±1.2 log10 IU/mL,p <0.001) [19]. Another research also mentions that fibrosis ≤F1 has higher levels of quantitativeHBsAg than fibrosis >F1 [25]. Although the exact mechanism of the inverse association between the qHBsAg level and staging of liver fibrosis is not fully understood, previous researchers speculate that decreasing HBsAg levels with increasing fibrosis severity might be caused by greater HBsAg retention in cells than HBsAg secretion into the circulation, or reduced host ability to support viral replication with increased severity of liver fibrosis [17]. In addition, the natural course of chronic HBV infection is another reason for lower HBsAg levels along with the development of liver fibrosis in HBeAg-positive patients. Quantitative HBsAg levels were found to be higher in the immune-tolerant phase which liver fibrosis was minimal compared to the immune clearance phase which liver fibrosis was more severe [26,27].

 

Our study had several limitations. First, it was a cross-sectional study in which qHBsAg levels and transient elastography were only done once, so it could not be able to evaluate the changes that might change over time. Therefore, longitudinal studies are needed to further explore and exact correlation between liver fibrosis and qHBsAg level. Further researches are required regarding quantitative HBsAg levels as a marker of fibrosis with gold standard liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis B patients. Second, we did not do complete examination such as HBV DNA, liver biopsy, and HBV genotypes. The quantitative HBsAg levels were not diluted if the levels > 2500 IU/mL (3.4 log10 IU/mL).

CONCLUSION

We found a negative correlation between liver fibrosis based on transient elastography and quantitative HBsAg levels in HBeAg-positive CHB. Low level of qHBsAg can be considered to get starting liver fibrosis test, especially by using transient elastography, which might be useful for determining treatment strategy.

REFERENCE
  1. Turyadi, Thedja MD, Ie SI et al., HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA level changes and precore/basal core promoter mutations in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B in Indonesian patients, Hepatology International, 2013; 7(4):969–980.
  2. Lubis HP, Halim B, Adenin I et al., Hepatitis B virus infection on male partner has negative impact on in-vitro fertilization, In L. W, D. W, W. M et al. (eds): HFC IVF Center, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2018. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/125/1/01204
  3. Kar P, Goswami B, Mahanta J, et al. Epidemiology, Genotyping, Mutational and Phylogenetic Analysis of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in North-east India. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022;12(1):43-51. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2021.04.002
  4. Borah B, Sharma A, Rabha D, et al. Co-circulation of different genotype, sub-genotype and serotypes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and its epidemiology in Assam: A north-eastern state of India. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2021 Jul;39(3):352-357
  5. Wong GL, Wong VW, Choi PC et al., Clinical factors associated with liver stiffness in Hepatitis B e antigen–positive chronic hepatitis B patients, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009; 7(2):227–233.
  6. Liver EAFTSOT, EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection, Journal of hepatology, 2017; 67(2):370–398
  7. Husni N, Anniwati L, Lukitasari L, APRI Profile of Cirrhotic Patients with Positive HBsAg, JUXTA: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga, 2019; 10(1):34–37.
  8. Zoulim F, New insight on hepatitis B virus persistence from the study of intrahepatic viral cccDNA, Journal of hepatology, 2005; 42(3):302– 308.
  9. Wungu CDK, Amin M, Kholili U et al., Distribution of Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes Among Patients at Internal Medicine Unit, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, WMJ (Warmadewa Medical Journal), 2019; 4(1):6–13
  10. Annisa, Zain LH, Loesnihari R, Protection status against hepatitis B infection assessed fromantiHBs level, history of vaccination andhistory of infection based on anti-HBc in medical students, In L. W, D. W, W. M et al. (eds): Postgraduate Program in Tropical and Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sumatera Utara, Jl. Dr. T. Mansur, Padang Bulan, Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20155, Indonesia: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2018. doi:10.1088/1755- 1315/125/1/012104.
  11. Chan HL, Wong VW, Tse AM et al., Serum hepatitis B surface antigen quantitation can reflect hepatitis B virus in the liver and predict treatment response, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2007; 5(12):1462–1468.
  12. Primadharsini PP, Wibawa IDN, Correlation between quantitative HbsAg and HBV-DNA in chronic hepatitis B infection, Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy, 2013; 14(1):9–12.
  13. Nurulita A, Bahrun U, Intansari U, Mulyono B, Correlation of Hbsag, HBeag and HBV dna viral load in chronic hepatitis B patients, Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 2019; 10(10):1395–1398.
  14. Sembiring J, Jones F, Diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis based on red cell distribution width (RDW) to platelet ratio with fibroscan in chronic hepatitis B, In L. W, D. W, W. M et al. (eds): Division of Gastroentero-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2018. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/125/1/012215
  15. Lesmana CR, Hasan I, Gani RA et al., Konsensus nasional penatalaksanaan hepatitis B di Indonesia 2017. editor: Lesmana C R, PPHI. Jakarta, 2017:1–82.
  16. Dimzova M, Kondova-Topuzovska I, Bosilkovski M et al., Noninvasive Biomarkers in Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B, Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2018; 6(6):1052.
  17. Martinot-Peignoux M, Carvalho-Filho R, Lapalus M et al., Hepatitis B surface antigen serum level is associated with fibrosis severity in treatmentnaïve, e antigen-positive patients, Journal of hepatology, 2013; 58(6):1089–1095.
  18. Goyal SK, Jain AK, Dixit VK et al., HBsAg level as predictor of liver fibrosis in HBeAg positive patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology, 2015; 5(3):213–220.
  19. Liang L-B, Zhu X, Yan L-B et al., Serum hepatitis B surface antigen titer and transient elastography in screening for insignificant fibrosis in HBeAgpositive chronic hepatitis B patients, Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2015; 11:229.
  20. Lesmana CRA, Jackson K, Hammond R et al., The Association among Serum Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (qHBsAg), Intrahepatic HBV Markers and Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Patients, J Liver Res Disord Ther, 2015; 1(2):7
  21. Cornberg M, Wong VW-S, Locarnini S et al., The role of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen revisited, Journal of hepatology, 2017; 66(2):398– 411
  22. Hong M-Z, Huang W-Q, Min F et al., Enhanced HBsAg synthesis correlates with increased severity of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients, PloS one, 2014.
  23. Custer B, Sullivan SD, Hazlet TK et al., Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus, Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2004; 38(10):S158– S168.
  24. Wang S, Chen P, Yeh S, Gender disparity in chronic hepatitis B: mechanisms of sex hormones, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2015; 30(8):1237–1245.
  25. Seto W-K, Wong DK-H, Fung J et al., High hepatitis B surface antigen levels predict insignificant fibrosis in hepatitis B e antigen positive chronic hepatitis B, PloS one, 2012.
  26. Bayliss J, Nguyen T, Lesmana CRA et al., Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis B infection: providing insight into the next generation of disease, Seminars in liver disease, Thieme Medical Publishers, 2013; 33(02):113– 121
  27. Li Q, Li W, Lu C et al., Serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels predict insignificant fibrosis and non-cirrhosis in hepatitis B e antigen positive patients with normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels, Nontarget, 2017; 8(49):86463.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Patterns The study of nutrient foramina in human clavicle
Published: 05/02/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Fixation of pertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail in adults
Published: 20/09/2018
Download PDF
Research Article
Predictive Value of Serum Uric Acid in Patients with Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure at Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
Published: 28/12/2016
Download PDF
Research Article
Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing MRI Scans.
Published: 25/04/2017
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.