Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
14 Views
3 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 10 (October, 2025) | Pages 625 - 629
Atypical Iron Accumulation in the Fascicula Nigrale of Parkinson's Patients: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center in Erode, Tamil Nadu
 ,
 ,
1
Senior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Erode Medical College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamilnadu, India.
2
CMO/Neuro surgeon, Department of Emergency Medicine, Government Erode Medical College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamilnadu, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Sept. 24, 2025
Revised
Oct. 4, 2025
Accepted
Oct. 15, 2025
Published
Oct. 29, 2025
Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with elevated brain iron levels, particularly in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway. This study evaluates iron deposition patterns in the fascicula nigrale (FN) and substantia nigra (SN) in PD patients compared to healthy controls using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Methods: From March 2025 to September 2025, this prospective study at Government Erode Medical College, Perundurai, enrolled 25 newly diagnosed idiopathic PD patients (15 males, 10 females; mean age 58.6 ± 10.7 years) and 25 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (HVs; 9 males, 16 females; mean age 61.4 ± 7.3 years). Participants underwent 3T brain MRI with QSM. Regions of interest (ROIs) for FN (rostral/caudal segments), SN, and other deep gray matter structures were delineated on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) maps by blinded investigators. Susceptibility values were analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlations (P < 0.05). Results: Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility was high (r = 0.761–0.972). PD patients showed significantly higher susceptibility in the SN (P = 0.011), SN pars compacta (SNc), internal globus pallidus (GPi), red nucleus (RN), putamen, and caudate nucleus (P < 0.05). Both groups exhibited an anterior-to-posterior FN iron gradient, accentuated in PD, with a significant age correlation (r = 0.62, P < 0.05). Mean FN susceptibility was lower in PD (1123.78 ± 21.00 ppm) than HVs (1179.55 ± 15.16 ppm; P = 0.055); caudal FN showed similar trends (1125.13 ± 55.8 ppm vs. 1163.00 ± 18.8 ppm; P = 0.083). Conclusion: PD features increased iron in nigrostriatal structures and an exaggerated FN gradient, suggesting tract dysfunction and age-related cumulative effects. QSM is a promising PD biomarker, warranting further mechanistic studies.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor dysfunction due to dopaminergic neuron loss and Lewy body formation in the nigrostriatal pathway [1–3]. Elevated brain iron, particularly in the substantia nigra (SN), contributes to oxidative stress via the Fenton reaction, producing reactive oxygen species that damage neurons and proteins [4–6].

 

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), derived from gradient-echo MRI, quantifies tissue magnetic susceptibility with high sensitivity to iron (e.g., ferritin, hemosiderin), outperforming R2* mapping and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) [7,19,20]. QSM correlates strongly with biochemical iron levels (r = 0.84) [24–27].

 

The fascicula nigrale (FN), a mineralized tract of striatonigral and nigrostriatal fibers, extends from the globus pallidus (GP) to the SN, potentially mediating iron transport [8–10] (Figure 1). On SWI, it appears as a hyperintense linear structure from the medial GP to the anterior SN (Figure 2).

Prior studies confirm SN iron overload in PD, especially in the SN pars compacta (SNc), correlating with disease severity (e.g., Hoehn and Yahr scores, UPDRS) [11,12,19,20,24,28–35]. Upregulated iron transporters (transferrin, lactoferrin, DMT1) in dopaminergic neurons may disrupt homeostasis, exacerbating age-related accumulation [13–18]. Noninvasive imaging (QSM, SWI, R2*) validates postmortem findings, with QSM offering superior sensitivity [36–41].

 

This study hypothesized atypical iron patterns in the FN and SN of PD patients, using QSM to quantify deposition and explore age associations in a South Indian cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Participants

This prospective observational study, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Government Erode Medical College, Perundurai (Approval No. GEMC/IEC/2025/03), adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

 

From March 2025 to September 2025, 25 patients with newly diagnosed idiopathic PD (UK Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank criteria) were enrolled (15 males, 10 females; age 50–72 years; mean 58.6 ± 10.7 years). MRI was performed within 3 months of diagnosis, pre-treatment. Exclusions included atypical, vascular, or drug-induced parkinsonism; cognitive impairment; stroke; head trauma; brain lesions; or other neurodegenerative/psychiatric disorders.

 

Twenty-five age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (HVs; 9 males, 16 females; age 54–85 years; mean 61.4 ± 7.3 years) were recruited with identical exclusions.

 

Imaging Acquisition

Imaging was performed using a 3T Siemens Magnetom Vida MRI scanner equipped with a 12-channel head coil. The imaging protocol included several sequences: sagittal T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE (1 × 1 × 1 mm voxel; TR/TE/TI = 1950/2.26/900 ms), sagittal 3D T2-weighted SPACE (1 × 1 × 1 mm voxel; TR/TE = 3200/458 ms), axial fat-saturated FLAIR (3 mm slice; TR/TE/TI = 9000/77/2500 ms; 0.9 mm gap), axial diffusion-weighted EPI (1.5 × 1.5 × 3 mm voxel; TR/TE = 5700/103 ms; 0.9 mm gap), and axial 3D SWI (0.5 × 0.5 × 2 mm voxel; TR/TE = 29/20 ms). The T1- and T2-weighted sequences were used to aid in anatomical localization..

Image Processing and ROI Analysis

QSM was generated using SPIN software from SWI magnitude and phase images (inverse filter threshold 0.1; vein threshold 200; k-space threshold 0.1; 3 iterations). Minimum intensity projections (mIPs) covered 8 mm (4 × 2 mm slices).

 

Two blinded radiologists delineated bilateral ROIs for FN, SN, putamen, thalamus, RN, dentate nucleus, and precentral gyrus on mIPs. The FN was traced from GP to SN (3–10 slices; mean length 40–41 mm bilaterally), bisected into rostral/caudal halves (caudal prioritized for odd slices). Susceptibility (ppm) was thresholded at 1000 ppm (subcortical white matter mean: 1000.06 ± 0.5 ppm); maximum values above threshold were recorded. A third reader resolved discrepancies (4/68 cases).Reproducibility was assessed via correlation coefficients.

 

Statistical Analysis

Sample size was calculated using Statistica v9.0 (StatSoft) for 80% power (α = 0.05). Analyses used SPSS v28.0 (IBM). Data are reported as mean ± SD. Comparisons used independent t-tests and ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc. Correlations used Pearson’s r. Significance was set at P < 0.05 (95% CI).

RESULT

Reproducibility was excellent for FN intra-rater (r = 0.972) and acceptable/good for inter-rater FN (r = 0.761) and SN (r = 0.818) (Table 2). SN susceptibility was significantly higher in PD (P = 0.011).

 

Mean FN susceptibility trended lower in PD (1123.78 ± 21.00 ppm) than HVs (1179.55 ± 15.16 ppm; P = 0.055), with similar trends in caudal FN (1125.13 ± 55.8 ppm vs. 1163.00 ± 18.8 ppm; P = 0.083) (Table 3). The rostral-to-caudal FN gradient increased in PD, correlating with age (r = 0.62, P < 0.05), unlike HVs.

 

PD patients showed elevated susceptibility in SNc, GPi, RN, putamen, and caudate (P < 0.05).

 

Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants. The Parkinson’s disease (PD) group consisted of 25 individuals (15 males and 10 females), while the healthy volunteer (HV) group included 25 individuals (9 males and 16 females), with no significant difference in gender distribution (p = 0.078). The mean age of participants in the PD group was 58.6 ± 10.7 years, compared to 61.4 ± 7.3 years in the HV group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.188). The average duration from diagnosis to MRI in the PD group was 1.4 ± 0.5 months. Regarding handedness, the majority of participants were right-handed in both groups, with a distribution of 20 right-handed and 5 left-handed individuals in the PD group, and 22 right-handed and 3 left-handed individuals in the HV group.

 

Table 1: Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

Parameter

PD (N=25)

HVs (N=25)

P-value

Male:Female

15:10

9:16

0.078

Mean Age (years)

58.6 ± 10.7

61.4 ± 7.3

0.188

Diagnosis to MRI (months)

1.4 ± 0.5

N/A

-

Handedness (R:L)

20:5

22:3

-

 

Table 2 presents the results of reproducibility analysis and substantia nigra (SN) susceptibility measurements. The intra-rater reliability for fractional anisotropy (FN) was excellent, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.972, indicating high consistency within the same rater. The inter-rater reliability for FN was acceptable (r = 0.761), while the inter-rater reliability for SN measurements was good (r = 0.818), demonstrating satisfactory agreement between raters. Furthermore, SN susceptibility in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) was found to be significantly different compared to healthy controls (p = 0.011), suggesting a meaningful alteration in SN characteristics associated with PD.

 

Table 2: Reproducibility and SN Susceptibility

Parameter

Value

Interpretation

Intra-rater FN

r=0.972

Excellent

Inter-rater FN

r=0.761

Acceptable

Inter-rater SN

r=0.818

Good

SN Susceptibility in PD

P=0.011

Significant

 

Table 3 presents the comparison of fractional nigral (FN) iron levels between patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy volunteers (HVs). The mean iron deposition in the PD group was 1123.78 ± 21.00 ppm, while in the HV group it was slightly higher at 1179.55 ± 15.16 ppm; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055). Similarly, in the caudal aspect of the FN, iron deposition was 1125.13 ± 55.8 ppm in the PD group and 1163.00 ± 18.8 ppm in the HV group, with no significant difference observed (p = 0.083). These findings indicate a trend toward reduced iron levels in the FN among PD patients, though the differences were not statistically significant.

 

Table 3: FN Iron Levels (ppm)

Parameter

PD

HVs

P-value

Mean Deposition

1123.78 ± 21.00

1179.55 ± 15.16

0.055

Caudal Aspect

1125.13 ± 55.8

1163.00 ± 18.8

0.083

Figure 1:  Comparison of Mean Iron Deposition (Susceptibility in ppm) in the Fascicula Nigrale Between Parkinson’s Patients and Healthy Volunteers.

DISCUSSION

This study provides compelling evidence of elevated iron deposition within the substantia nigra (SN) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), aligning with previous findings from quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) studies [11,38–40]. A particularly novel observation of this study is the presence of an accentuated rostral-to-caudal gradient in fractional nigral (FN) iron distribution among PD patients. This gradient, which also correlated with advancing age, may indicate an underlying dysfunction in iron transport mechanisms within the nigrostriatal pathway. Such dysregulation could be attributed to the abnormal expression or activity of iron transport proteins such as divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) and transferrin [13–17], which may lead to excessive iron accumulation in specific nigral subregions. The resultant increase in iron concentration could promote the generation of reactive oxygen species, contributing to oxidative stress and neuronal degeneration—a well-established pathological feature of PD [4–6]. Interestingly, the observation of lower FN iron levels in PD patients compared to healthy volunteers may suggest a redistribution of iron from the FN to the SN or reflect an early compensatory mechanism due to impaired iron homeostasis. The observed age correlation supports the hypothesis that such iron accumulation and redistribution may begin in the presymptomatic stages of PD, gradually contributing to neurodegeneration over time. The use of QSM in this study, with its superior spatial resolution and quantitative accuracy [40,41], enabled precise detection of subtle regional variations in iron content, thereby strengthening the validity of these findings.

 

Among the notable strengths of the present study are its prospective design, the blinded analysis of imaging data to reduce bias, and the demonstration of high intra- and inter-rater reproducibility, ensuring methodological reliability. However, certain limitations must be acknowledged. The study was conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the results. Additionally, potential contamination of small regions of interest (ROIs) by adjacent white matter could not be entirely excluded, although this was mitigated through maximum value analysis. Furthermore, the absence of a priori power calculations for subgroup analyses may have reduced the statistical robustness for detecting smaller effect sizes. To build upon these findings, future research should aim to include larger, multicenter cohorts with longitudinal follow-up to better elucidate the temporal progression of iron accumulation in PD. Correlating imaging findings with detailed clinical, biochemical, and neurobehavioral measures could further clarify the pathophysiological significance of iron dysregulation. Moreover, mechanistic studies focusing on molecular pathways of iron transport and metabolism may help identify potential therapeutic targets for modulating iron homeostasis in Parkinson’s disease

CONCLUSION

PD is characterized by neuronal loss and iron dysregulation in the nigrostriatal pathway. The exaggerated FN iron gradient, linked to age, suggests tract dysfunction and cumulative pathology. QSM is a valuable noninvasive biomarker for PD, supporting its diagnostic and research utility.

 

Abbreviations

  • PD: Parkinson’s disease
  • SN: Substantia nigra
  • FN: Fascicula nigrale
  • QSM: Quantitative susceptibility mapping
  • SWI: Susceptibility-weighted imaging
  • SNc: Substantia nigra pars compacta
  • GPi: Globus pallidus interna
  • RN: Red nucleus
  • HVs: Healthy volunteers
  • ROI: Region of interest

 

Limitations

This was a single-center study with a limited sample size, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings. There is also a possibility of white matter contamination in small regions of interest (ROIs); however, this was mitigated by employing maximum value analysis. Additionally, no pretreatment power calculation was performed for all outcome measures, which may affect the statistical robustness of the results

 

Acknowledgments:

I thank all the faculty , teaching and non-teaching staff of Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Erode Medical College, Perundurai, Erode and participants of  study for their valuable contribution The authors would like to thank all of the study participants and the administration Department of Radiodiagnosis, Government Erode Medical College, Perundurai, Erode, Tamilnadu, India  for granting permission to carry out the research work.

 

Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

 

Ethical statement:

Institutional ethical committee accepted this study. The study was approved by the institutional human ethics committee, Government Erode Medical College, Perundurai, Erode. Informed written consent was obtained from all the study participants and only those participants willing to sign the informed consent were included in the study. The risks and benefits involved in the study and the voluntary nature of participation were explained to the participants before obtaining consent. The confidentiality of the study participants was maintained.

 

Funding: Nil.

 

Authors’ contributions: *, ,

Dr.M.Resnik Banu: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.  Dr.I.Kittu,  Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing. Dr.D.Chandra Mohan   Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

 

DATA AVAILABILITY:

All datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

 

INFORMED CONSENT:

Written informed consent was obtained from the participants before enrolling in the study

REFERENCES
  1. Dexter D, et al. Increased nigral iron content in postmortem parkinsonian brain. Lancet. 1987;2(8569):1219–20.
  2. Hashimoto M, et al. Oxidative stress induces amyloid-like aggregate formation of NACP/alpha-synuclein in vitro. NeuroReport. 1999;10(4):717–21.
  3. Fearnley J, Lees A. Ageing and Parkinson’s disease: substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain. 1991;114(Pt 5):2283–301.
  4. Ward R, et al. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(10):1045–60.
  5. Rhodes SL, Ritz B. Genetics of iron regulation and the possible role of iron in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;32(2):183–95.
  6. Berg D, Hochstrasser H. Iron metabolism in Parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord. 2006;21(9):1299–310.
  7. Li W, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage. 2011;55(4):1645–56.
  8. Harder SL, et al. Mineralization of the deep gray matter with age: a retrospective review with susceptibility-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(1):176–83.
  9. Manova ES, et al. Characterizing the mesencephalon using susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(3):569–74.
  10. Peckham ME, et al. Novel pattern of iron deposition in the fascicula nigrale in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. Radiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:9305018.
  11. Graham JM, et al. Brain iron deposition in Parkinson’s disease imaged using the PRIME magnetic resonance sequence. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 12):2423–31.
  12. Dashtipour K, et al. Iron accumulation is not homogenous among patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2015;2015:324843.
  13. Lee DW, Andersen JK. Iron elevations in the aging Parkinsonian brain: a consequence of impaired iron homeostasis? J Neurochem. 2010;112(2):332–9.
  14. Olanow CW, Youdim MB. Iron and neurodegeneration: prospects for neuroprotection. In: Neurodegeneration and Neuroprotection in Parkinson’s Disease. Academic Press; 1996. p. 55–67.
  15. Moos T, et al. Developmental iron uptake and axonal transport in the retina of the rat. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011;46(3):607–13.
  16. Hirsch EC. Altered regulation of iron transport and storage in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2006;(71):201–4.
  17. Hirsch EC. Iron transport in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009;15 Suppl 3:S209–11.
  18. Hallgren B, Sourander P. The effect of age on the non-haemin iron in the human brain. J Neurochem. 1958;3(1):41–51.
  19. Du G, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the midbrain in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2016;31(3):317–24.
  20. Murakami Y, et al. Usefulness of quantitative susceptibility mapping for the diagnosis of Parkinson disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(6):1102–8.
  21. Haacke EM, et al. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;23(1):1–25.
  22. Schenck JF, Zimmerman EA. High-field magnetic resonance imaging of brain iron: birth of a biomarker? NMR Biomed. 2004;17(7):433–45.
  23. Riederer P, et al. Transition metals, ferritin, glutathione, and ascorbic acid in parkinsonian brains. J Neurochem. 1989;52(2):515–20.
  24. He N, et al. Region-specific disturbed iron distribution in early idiopathic Parkinson’s disease measured by quantitative susceptibility mapping. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(11):4407–20.
  25. Langkammer C, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. Neuroimage. 2012;62(3):1593–9.
  26. Wu B, et al. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(1):137–47.
  27. Sun H, et al. Validation of quantitative susceptibility mapping with Perls’ iron staining for subcortical gray matter. Neuroimage. 2015;105:486–92.
  28. Guan X, et al. Regionally progressive accumulation of iron in Parkinson’s disease as measured by quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3489.
  29. Acosta-Cabronero J, et al. The whole-brain pattern of magnetic susceptibility perturbations in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2017;140(1):118–31.
  30. Langkammer C, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162460.
  31. Guan X, et al. Influence of regional iron on the motor impairments of Parkinson’s disease: a quantitative susceptibility mapping study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(5):1335–42.
  32. Martin-Bastida A, et al. Motor associations of iron accumulation in deep grey matter nuclei in Parkinson’s disease: a cross-sectional study of iron-related magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(2):357–65.
  33. Xuan M, et al. Different iron deposition patterns in early- and middle-late-onset Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;44:23–7.
  34. Zhao X, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Appl Magn Reson. 2017;48(6):533–44.
  35. An H, et al. Quantifying iron deposition within the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease by quantitative susceptibility mapping. J Neurol Sci. 2018;386:46–52.
  36. Péran P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging markers of Parkinson’s disease nigrostriatal signature. Brain. 2010;133(11):3423–33.
  37. Haacke EM, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(1):1–25.
  38. Zhang J, et al. Characterizing iron deposition in Parkinson’s disease using susceptibility-weighted imaging: an in vivo MR study. Brain Res. 2010;1330:124–30.
  39. Deistung A, et al. Toward in vivo histology: a comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) with magnitude-, phase-, and R2*-imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength. Neuroimage. 2013;65:299–314.
  40. Murakami Y, et al. Usefulness of quantitative susceptibility mapping for the diagnosis of Parkinson disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(6):1102–8.
  41. Barbosa JH, et al. Quantifying brain iron deposition in patients with Parkinson’s disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2*. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(5):559–65.V
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Assessing The Degree of Maternal, Fetal, And Perinatal Morbidity Connected to Each Labor Induction Cause in Order to Determine How Induction Indications Impact Delivery Modes Routes and Outcomes
...
Published: 30/10/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Association of Neck Circumference and Serum Uric Acid with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Metabolic Syndrome Patients
...
Published: 29/10/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Comparative Analysis of Novel Predictive Markers: Monocyte-to-HDL Ratio (MHR) versus Hemoglobin-to-RDW Ratio (HRR) in Post-PCI Coronary Heart Disease
Published: 07/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Comparative Evaluation of Azithromycin and Doxycycline in Acute Exacerbations of COPD
...
Published: 31/10/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.