Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
76 Views
10 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 8 (August, 2025) | Pages 315 - 317
Comparative Evaluation of a Botanical Oral Rinse with Punica granatum, Grapefruit Seed Extract, and Thymol Versus Chlorhexidine in Controlling Plaque and Gingivitis
1
Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, Himachal Dental College, Sundernagar, Himachal Pradesh
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
July 14, 2025
Revised
July 25, 2025
Accepted
Aug. 3, 2025
Published
Aug. 12, 2025
Abstract

Background: Chlorhexidine (CHX) is considered the gold standard in chemical plaque control; however, its long-term use is associated with adverse effects such as tooth staining and altered taste. Botanical alternatives containing plant-derived antimicrobials may provide similar efficacy with fewer side effects. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted with 60 systemically healthy participants exhibiting mild to moderate gingivitis. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 30 each): Group A—botanical oral rinse, Group B—0.12% CHX. Baseline Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) scores were recorded, and mouthwashes were used twice daily after brushing for 21 days. Outcomes were assessed on day 7, day 14, and day 21. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and independent t-tests. Key Findings: Both groups showed significant reductions in PI and GI from baseline to day 21 (p < 0.001). At day 21, PI reduction was 41.8% in Group A (from 1.92 ± 0.22 to 1.12 ± 0.20) and 44.5% in Group B (from 1.95 ± 0.24 to 1.08 ± 0.19), with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.14). GI reduction was 39.7% in Group A (from 1.82 ± 0.18 to 1.10 ± 0.16) and 42.3% in Group B (from 1.84 ± 0.19 to 1.06 ± 0.15), with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.12). Conclusion: The botanical oral rinse demonstrated comparable efficacy to 0.12% CHX in reducing plaque and gingivitis over 21 days, suggesting it may be a viable herbal alternative for routine oral hygiene.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Dental plaque is a complex biofilm that is the primary etiological factor for gingivitis and periodontitis [1]. While mechanical plaque removal through toothbrushing and interdental cleaning remains the cornerstone of oral hygiene, adjunctive chemical plaque control agents can enhance biofilm management [2].

 

Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) is widely regarded as the gold standard chemical antiplaque agent due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and substantivity [3]. However, prolonged use of CHX is associated with undesirable effects such as extrinsic tooth staining, mucosal irritation, altered taste sensation, and increased calculus formation [4,5]. These limitations have driven interest in herbal or botanical mouth rinses as alternative or adjunctive solutions.

 

Phytochemicals such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and essential oils exhibit antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties [6]. Punica granatum (pomegranate) extract has demonstrated inhibitory effects against Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis, and has been shown to reduce plaque accumulation in vivo [7]. Grapefruit seed extract contains bioactive compounds like naringin and ascorbic acid, which possess antimicrobial potential against oral pathogens [8]. Thymol, a monoterpenoid phenol derived from thyme oil, has potent antiseptic and plaque-inhibitory properties and is widely used in commercial mouthwashes [9].

 

Although studies have evaluated the effects of individual plant-based agents, there is limited clinical evidence comparing a combined botanical formulation with CHX under controlled conditions. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a botanical oral rinse containing Punica granatum, grapefruit seed extract, and thymol with 0.12% CHX mouthwash in reducing plaque and gingivitis over a 21-day period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted over 21 days.

 

Participants: Sixty systemically healthy volunteers (aged 18–35 years) with mild to moderate gingivitis (GI score 1.1–2.0) and PI score ≥ 1.5 were enrolled.

 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minimum of 20 natural teeth
  • No periodontal therapy in the past 6 months
  • No antimicrobial mouthwash use in the past 3 months

 

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic diseases affecting periodontal health
  • Smoking or tobacco use
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Known allergy to study agents

 

Randomization and Blinding: Participants were randomly allocated to two groups (n = 30 each) using a computer-generated list. Mouthwashes were dispensed in identical bottles coded by an independent researcher to ensure blinding.

 

Intervention:

  • Group A: Botanical oral rinse containing Punica granatum extract (0.2%), grapefruit seed extract (0.1%), and thymol (0.05%).
  • Group B: 0.12% CHX mouthwash.
    Participants were instructed to rinse with 15 mL of assigned mouthwash for 30 seconds twice daily after brushing, without eating or drinking for 30 minutes afterward.

 

Clinical Assessments: Plaque Index (Silness and Löe) and Gingival Index (Löe and Silness) were recorded at baseline, day 7, day 14, and day 21 by a calibrated examiner.

 

Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS v27. Intragroup changes were assessed with repeated measures ANOVA, and intergroup comparisons at each time point were performed with independent t-tests. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Table 1. Mean Plaque Index Scores at Different Time Points

Time Point

Group A (Botanical) Mean ± SD

Group B (CHX) Mean ± SD

p-value

Baseline

1.92 ± 0.22

1.95 ± 0.24

0.58

Day 7

1.52 ± 0.20

1.46 ± 0.18

0.21

Day 14

1.28 ± 0.19

1.21 ± 0.17

0.17

Day 21

1.12 ± 0.20

1.08 ± 0.19

0.14

 

Table 2. Mean Gingival Index Scores at Different Time Points

Time Point

Group A (Botanical) Mean ± SD

Group B (CHX) Mean ± SD

p-value

Baseline

1.82 ± 0.18

1.84 ± 0.19

0.64

Day 7

1.48 ± 0.16

1.42 ± 0.15

0.12

Day 14

1.26 ± 0.15

1.19 ± 0.14

0.10

Day 21

1.10 ± 0.16

1.06 ± 0.15

0.12

 

Table 3. Percentage Reduction in PI and GI from Baseline to Day 21

Parameter

Group A (Botanical)

Group B (CHX)

p-value

PI

41.8%

44.5%

0.14

GI

39.7%

42.3%

0.12

 

Interpretation: Both groups showed significant reductions in PI and GI over time (p < 0.001 intragroup), with no statistically significant intergroup differences at any time point.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that a botanical oral rinse containing Punica granatum, grapefruit seed extract, and thymol was as effective as 0.12% CHX in reducing plaque and gingivitis over 21 days.

 

Our findings are in line with previous studies evaluating herbal mouthwashes. Pomegranate extract has been shown to significantly reduce dental plaque and gingival inflammation due to its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [10]. Similarly, grapefruit seed extract exhibits broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and has been proposed as a natural oral antiseptic [11]. Thymol, a key constituent of essential oils, disrupts bacterial cell membranes and has demonstrated plaque-inhibitory effects comparable to CHX in short-term trials [12].

 

In the present study, both mouthwashes produced over 40% reductions in PI and GI scores, consistent with the efficacy range reported for CHX in prior research [13]. The lack of statistically significant difference between the groups suggests that the botanical combination may serve as a viable herbal alternative for short-term plaque and gingivitis control.

 

One notable advantage of botanical rinses is their lower incidence of adverse effects. While this study did not formally assess side effects, none of the participants in the botanical group reported tooth staining or taste alteration—common complaints with CHX use [14-15].

 

Limitations include the relatively short duration (21 days) and the absence of microbiological assessment of plaque composition. Long-term studies are warranted to evaluate sustained efficacy and safety, particularly with regard to stain formation, calculus build-up, and patient compliance

CONCLUSION

The botanical oral rinse containing Punica granatum, grapefruit seed extract, and thymol demonstrated plaque- and gingivitis-reducing efficacy comparable to 0.12% CHX over 21 days. This suggests that botanical formulations could be considered as effective and potentially safer alternatives for short-term chemical plaque control.

REFERENCES
  1. Parwani SR, Parwani RN, Chitnis PJ, Dadlani HP, Prasad SV. Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Jan;17(1):72-7. doi:10.4103/0972-124X.107478. PMID: 23633777.
  2. Gupta RK, Gupta D, Bhaskar DJ, Yadav A, Obaid K, Mishra S. Preliminary antiplaque efficacy of aloe vera mouthwash on 4 day plaque re-growth model: randomized control trial. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014 Apr;24(2):139-44. doi:10.4314/ejhs.v24i2.6. PMID: 24795515.
  3. Prasad KA, John S, Deepika V, Dwijendra KS, Reddy BR, Chincholi S. Anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash: a comparative study. J Int Oral Health. 2015 Aug;7(8):98-102. PMID: 26464549.
  4. Mali GV, Dodamani AS, Karibasappa GN, Vishwakarma P, Jain VM. Comparative evaluation of Arimedadi oil with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate in prevention of plaque and gingivitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC31-4. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/19120.8132. PMID: 27630949.
  5. Dany SS, Mohanty P, Tangade P, Rajput P, Batra M. Efficacy of 0.25% lemongrass oil mouthwash: a three arm prospective parallel clinical study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):ZC13-7. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/14465.6581. PMID: 26557608.
  6. Waghmare PF, Chaudhari AU, Karhadkar VM, Jamkhande AS. Comparative evaluation of turmeric and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in prevention of plaque formation and gingivitis: a clinical and microbiological study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Jul 1;12(4):221-4. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1038. PMID: 22186854.
  7. Chhina S, Singh A, Menon I, Singh R, Sharma A, Aggarwal V. A randomized clinical study for comparative evaluation of aloe vera and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash efficacy on de-novo plaque formation. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 May-Jun;6(3):251-5. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.183109. PMID: 27382543.
  8. Bhat N, Mitra R, Oza S, Mantu VK, Bishnoi S, Gohil M, et al. The antiplaque effect of herbal mouthwash in comparison to chlorhexidine in human gingival disease: a randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. J Complement Integr Med. 2014 Jun;11(2):129-37. doi:10.1515/jcim-2014-0002. PMID: 24698829.
  9. Wasey F, Tantray S, Ahluwalia R, Khan MS. Comparative evaluation of 0.25% lemongrass oil mouthwash and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash in fixed orthodontic patients suffering from gingivitis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Jun 1;24(6):396-402. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3516. PMID: 37534506.
  10. Deshmukh MA, Dodamani AS, Karibasappa G, Khairnar MR, Naik RG, Jadhav HC. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of probiotic, herbal and chlorhexidine mouthwash on gingival health: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC13-ZC16. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/23891.9462. PMID: 28511500.
  11. Mali AM, Behal R, Gilda SS. Comparative evaluation of 0.1% turmeric mouthwash with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate in prevention of plaque and gingivitis: a clinical and microbiological study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jul;16(3):386-91. doi:10.4103/0972-124X.100917. PMID: 23162334.
  12. Gupta D, Nayan S, Tippanawar HK, Patil GI, Jain A, Momin RK, et al. Are herbal mouthwash efficacious over chlorhexidine on the dental plaque? Pharmacognosy Res. 2015 Jul-Sep;7(3):277-81. doi:10.4103/0974-8490.155874. PMID: 26130940.
  13. Jain A, Bhaskar DJ, Gupta D, Agali C, Gupta V, Gupta RK, et al. Comparative evaluation of honey, chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2%) and combination of xylitol and chlorhexidine mouthwash (0.2%) on the clinical level of dental plaque: a 30 days randomized control trial. Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Jan-Mar;6(1):53-7. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.148819. PMID: 25657903.
  14. Gunjal S, Pateel DGS. Comparative effectiveness of propolis with chlorhexidine mouthwash on gingivitis—a randomized controlled clinical study. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Apr 6;24(1):154. doi:10.1186/s12906-024-04456-8. PMID: 38582863.
  15. Jalaluddin M, Rajasekaran UB, Paul S, Dhanya RS, Sudeep CB, Adarsh VJ. Comparative evaluation of neem mouthwash on plaque and gingivitis: a double-blind crossover study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):567-71. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2085. PMID: 28713109.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Effect of OM meditation on cardiovascular parameters in hypertensive patients
...
Published: 22/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Endotracheal Size Estimation in Children: What is Latest? Different Methods and Correlation – A Prospective Observational Study
...
Published: 22/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Influence of Ketogenic Diet on Gastric Functions, Motility, in Central Indian Subjects: A Case-Control Study on the
Published: 07/05/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
Mucocutaneous Manifestations of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Children
...
Published: 20/08/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.