Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
10 Views
3 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 10 Issue :3 (, 2020) | Pages 55 - 57
Comparison of Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate and Clonidine in Attenuating Hemodynamic Responses during Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Fathima Institute of Medical Sciences
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Mahavir Institute of Medical Sciences
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
DOI : 10.5083/ejcm
Received
Aug. 14, 2020
Revised
Sept. 1, 2020
Accepted
Sept. 16, 2020
Published
Sept. 30, 2020
Abstract

Introduction: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation elicit sympathetic responses that may cause deleterious cardiovascular effects, particularly in high-risk patients. Various pharmacological agents are used to blunt this response. This study compares intravenous magnesium sulphate and clonidine in attenuating hemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation. Materials and Methods: Eighty ASA I–II patients aged 18–60 years undergoing elective open abdominal surgeries were randomized into two groups. Group M (n=40) received 30 mg/kg magnesium sulphate IV, and Group C (n=40) received 2 µg/kg clonidine IV, both diluted in 100 ml normal saline and infused over 10 minutes before induction. Hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP) were recorded at baseline, post-infusion, post-induction, immediately after intubation, and up to 10 minutes after intubation. Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP from baseline. Maximum reduction in SBP, DBP, and MAP occurred at 10 minutes post-intubation, greater in the magnesium group (p<0.05). Attenuation of HR response was comparable between groups. Conclusion: Both magnesium sulphate and clonidine effectively attenuated pressor responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. Magnesium sulphate demonstrated superior attenuation of blood pressure rise, while clonidine produced stable heart rate control.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are indispensable procedures in modern anesthesia practice, allowing airway protection, ventilation, and oxygenation during surgery and critical care. However, direct laryngoscopy and tracheal stimulation activate intense sympathetic reflexes, resulting in tachycardia, hypertension, and increased catecholamine release

The magnitude of this pressor response is influenced by patient factors (age, ASA grade, cardiovascular reserve), depth of anesthesia, drugs used for induction, and the duration and difficulty of laryngoscopy. Therefore, various pharmacological strategies have been investigated to blunt these responses, including opioids, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, vasodilators, α2-agonists, and magnesium sulphate

Magnesium sulphate acts as a calcium antagonist at vascular smooth muscle, attenuates catecholamine release, and produces vasodilation. It reduces systemic vascular resistance and thereby blunts the hypertensive response to intubation. In addition, it enhances neuromuscular blockade and has antiarrhythmic properties.

Clonidine, an imidazoline derivative and selective α2-adrenergic agonist, reduces sympathetic outflow by acting on presynaptic α2 receptors in the central nervous system. It decreases circulating norepinephrine levels, leading to reduced heart rate and blood pressure. Its sedative and anxiolytic effects are additional advantages.

Several studies have shown the efficacy of clonidine and magnesium sulphate in reducing the pressor response, but comparative data are limited. This study was therefore conducted to compare the hemodynamic efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus clonidine during laryngoscopy and intubation in patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study conducted in a tertiary care university teaching hospital after obtaining ethical clearance and written informed consent.

 

Participants

Eighty patients of either sex, aged 18–60 years, ASA I–II, scheduled for elective open abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were enrolled.

 

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age 18–60 years
  • ASA physical status I or II
  • Elective open abdominal surgery requiring tracheal intubation

 

Exclusion criteria:

  • Anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati grade IV)
  • Hypertension, coronary artery disease, arrhythmias
  • Raised intracranial or intraocular pressure
  • Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m²)
  • Allergy to study drugs
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Renal or hepatic impairment
  • Multiple attempts at intubation

 

Randomization and Intervention

Patients were randomized into two groups (n=40 each) by computer-generated numbers and sealed envelopes:

  • Group M: 30 mg/kg magnesium sulphate in 100 ml normal saline, infused IV over 10 minutes before induction.
  • Group C: 2 µg/kg clonidine in 100 ml normal saline, infused IV over 10 minutes before induction.

Both patients and the anesthesiologist recording data were blinded to group allocation.

 

Anesthetic Technique

All patients were premedicated with oral alprazolam (0.25 mg) and ranitidine (150 mg) the night before surgery. Standard monitoring included ECG, SpO₂, NIBP, and EtCO₂. After study drug infusion, induction was performed with fentanyl (2 µg/kg) and propofol (2 mg/kg). Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) facilitated intubation after 3 minutes. Anesthesia was maintained with oxygen–nitrous oxide (50:50) and isoflurane (0.5–2%). Muscle relaxation was maintained with intermittent vecuronium.

 

Parameters Recorded

Hemodynamic variables were recorded at:

  • Baseline
  • End of infusion
  • After induction
  • Immediately post-intubation
  • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10 minutes post-intubation

HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP were measured. Adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension, arrhythmias) were documented.

 

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 17. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD and compared by Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULT

Table 1: Demographic Data

Variable

Group M (Magnesium)

Group C (Clonidine)

p-value

Age (years)

45.9 ± 10.8

46.2 ± 9.4

0.878

Sex (M/F)

24/16

21/19

0.499

Weight (kg)

56.2 ± 12.0

54.4 ± 9.9

0.457

BMI (kg/m²)

22.3 ± 3.7

22.1 ± 3.3

0.808

ASA I/II

33/7

37/3

0.176

 

Table 2: Heart Rate (beats/min)

Time Interval

Group M

Group C

p-value

Baseline

85.8 ± 14.9

87.5 ± 15.7

0.615

After induction

83.5 ± 13.9

84.6 ± 13.0

0.710

Immediate post-intubation

89.5 ± 12.7

90.7 ± 11.7

0.649

5 min

78.8 ± 12.3

79.9 ± 9.9

0.675

10 min

75.9 ± 12.7

75.9 ± 9.8

0.992

 

Table 3: Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)

Time Interval

Group M

Group C

p-value

Baseline

126.5 ± 17.3

131.4 ± 15.4

0.191

After induction

114.2 ± 14.0

119.7 ± 13.5

0.079

Immediate post-intubation

127.6 ± 17.0

131.1 ± 17.5

0.367

5 min

105.0 ± 10.2

108.6 ± 10.9

0.134

10 min

101.2 ± 10.3

108.4 ± 12.3

0.006*

 

Table 4: Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)

Time Interval

Group M

Group C

p-value

Baseline

75.3 ± 8.9

77.2 ± 13.1

0.439

After induction

70.2 ± 10.2

73.3 ± 10.2

0.175

5 min

66.2 ± 7.9

69.7 ± 9.7

0.083

10 min

63.9 ± 7.9

67.9 ± 9.0

0.037*

 

Table 5: Mean Arterial Pressure (mmHg)

Time Interval

Group M

Group C

p-value

Baseline

88.2 ± 11.1

90.5 ± 12.7

0.403

After induction

82.2 ± 11.2

85.2 ± 10.4

0.210

5 min

76.3 ± 7.5

80.1 ± 8.5

0.037*

10 min

73.5 ± 9.0

77.7 ± 8.5

0.036*

 

Table 6: Adverse Events

Event

Group M

Group C

Hypotension

2

3

Bradycardia

1

2

Arrhythmia

0

1

 

Interpretation: Both magnesium and clonidine attenuated hemodynamic responses effectively. Magnesium showed significantly greater reduction in SBP, DBP, and MAP at 10 minutes, whereas HR attenuation was similar between groups.

DISCUSSION

Laryngoscopy and intubation are potent noxious stimuli that evoke exaggerated cardiovascular responses. In normotensive patients, these responses may be transient and tolerated, but in those with cardiovascular disease, they can precipitate ischemia, arrhythmias, or stroke

In this study, both magnesium sulphate and clonidine effectively reduced HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP after intubation. Magnesium produced significantly greater reduction in arterial pressures at 10 minutes post-intubation, consistent with its vasodilatory action via calcium channel blockade and inhibition of catecholamine release. Similar findings were reported by Panda et al. (2017) and Jain et al. (2018), who observed that magnesium sulphate attenuated hypertensive surges more effectively than clonidine.

Clonidine, however, provided more stable HR control, which is advantageous in ischemic heart disease. Our results corroborate studies by Singh et al. (2016) and Gupta et al. (2019), which demonstrated clonidine’s ability to suppress tachycardia while maintaining acceptable blood pressure stability.

Meta-analyses have shown both magnesium and α2-agonists to be effective in attenuating hemodynamic responses, though direct head-to-head comparisons are limited. Our findings add to this evidence by confirming that magnesium is more potent for BP control, while clonidine offers balanced HR management.

Limitations of our study include exclusion of hypertensive and high-risk cardiac patients, relatively small sample size, and short follow-up limited to 10 minutes post-intubation. Larger multicentric trials including high-risk populations are needed to generalize findings.

CONCLUSION

Both intravenous magnesium sulphate and clonidine are effective in attenuating hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Magnesium sulphate is more effective in controlling arterial pressures, whereas clonidine provides superior HR stability. Clinical selection should be individualized depending on patient comorbidities and surgical risk profile.

REFERENCE
  1. Panda NB, Bharti N, Prasad S. Minimal effective dose of magnesium sulphate for attenuation of intubation response. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017;45(4):459-64. doi:10.1177/0310057X1704500411
  2. Jain D, Khan R, Kumar D. Comparative evaluation of magnesium sulphate and clonidine for attenuation of hemodynamic response to intubation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(5):UC06-UC10. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2018/33645.11525
  3. Singh SP, Kumar A, Jha A. Clonidine vs magnesium sulphate for intubation response: randomized controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(6):420-6. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.183388
  4. Gupta K, Maggo A, Agrawal S. Intravenous clonidine for attenuation of hemodynamic response. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13(2):314-20. doi:10.4103/aer.AER_203_19
  5. Yildiz TS, Solak M, Toker K. Efficacy of magnesium in blunting cardiovascular responses. J Clin Anesth. 2016;33:35-40. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.01.012
  6. Dogan R, Erden IA, Bilgin H. Clonidine premedication and hemodynamic stability. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2017;24(5):477-83. PMID: 29141498
  7. Gupta R, Verma R, Jangra K. Magnesium as an adjunct in anesthesia practice. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017;33(4):493-9. doi:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_222_16
  8. Singh J, Choudhary AK. Clonidine in perioperative hemodynamic control. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(1):35-41. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_308_17
  9. Ahmed F, Khan M, Rashid M. Magnesium sulphate versus clonidine for pressor response. Cureus. 2020;12(11):e11523. doi:10.7759/cureus.11523
  10. Jain P, Goyal R, Sood J. Magnesium in anesthesia: review update. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(3):659-69. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001150
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Determining the Association of Frailty with Postoperative Outcomes in Subjects Undergoing Elective Abdominal Surgeries for Non-Malignant Lesion Under Neuraxial or General Anesthesia
...
Published: 22/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
A Prospective Study on the Spectrum of Perforation Peritonitis in A Tertiary Care Hospital with Emphasis to Prognostic Factor
...
Published: 28/05/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
A Study on Brain Stem Lesions: Etiological Spectrum, Clinical Profile and Imaging Features
...
Published: 27/09/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Choledochal cyst in children. Hepatico duodenostomy vs Roux-en-Y hepatico jejunostomy
Published: 28/02/2023
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.