Background: The induction of anaesthesia, laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation and surgical stimulation evoke cardiovascular responses leading to alteration in heart rate, cardiac rhythm and blood pressure. The response starts in 5 seconds, peaks within 1-2 minutes and returns to baseline in 5 minutes. The goal is to compare the effectiveness of Esmolol and Magnesium Sulphate for attenuation of haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Materials and Methods: After approval from the ASRAMS Institutional Ethics Committee, the procedure was clearly explained to patients and informed written consent was obtained. The study was conducted during the period, April 2024- March 2025 at ASRAM General and Super-Specialty Hospital, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. 90 patients of age group 15 to 60 yrs of ASA physical status I and II who underwent elective ENT surgery under general anesthesia were selected and randomly allocated into 3 groups. Baseline heart rate and blood pressure was measured. They were premedicated with Inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.2mg and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg intramuscular 45 minutes before surgery. Patients were then shifted into the theatre. Inj. Fentanyl 2µg/kg was given 5 minutes before intubation to all patients. They were induced with Inj. Propofol 2mg/kg and Vecuronium 0.1mg/kg. Group M received Inj. Magnesium Sulphate 50mg/kg in 100ml of normal saline infusion over 10 minutes before induction. Group P received 15ml of normal saline 5 minutes before induction. Group E received Esmolol 1.5mg/kg in 15ml normal saline over 15-20 seconds one minute after vecuronium and intubation was done after 2 minutes. Group P received 15ml of normal saline 5 minutes before induction. The heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were recorded baseline, after premedication, one min after test drug, after induction, immediately after intubation, thereafter 1, 3 and 5 minutes following intubation. Laryngoscopy duration was noted. Results: 1) Group E showed maximum attenuation of heart rate and blood pressure. 2) Group M also showed significant attenuation of blood pressure response but produced tachycardia on infusion of the drug. Heart rate response was not statistically significant compared to group E. 3) All patients recovered well. 4) Incidence of side effects was not significant between the groups. Conclusion: From this study, it is concluded that hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy and intubation can be attenuated by giving intravenous Esmolol 1.5mg/kg. Esmolol is effective in blunting the response followed by Magnesium Sulphate which blunts the hypertensive response but produces tachycardia during infusion of the drug. Placebo was ineffective in blunting hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation..
Reflex sympathetic discharge caused by epipharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal stimulation producing significant increase in heart rate and arterial pressure. The haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation should be attenuated to balance myocardial oxygen supply and demand especially in coronary artery disease patients. It is also hazardous in patients with cerebrovascular disease, intracranial pathology and hyperactive airways.
CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSE:
Hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia and dysrhythmias mediated by autonomic nervous system occurs. Hypertension, tachycardia, increase in cardiac work and oxygen consumption are mediated by sympathetic afferents via the cardioaccelerator fibres and sympathetic 8 chain ganglia. The polysynaptic pathway from 9th and 10th nerve afferents to sympathetic nervous system in the brain stem and spinal cord results in a diffuse autonomic response which includes widespread release of norepinephrine from the adrenergic terminals and release of epinephrine from the adrenal medulla.
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM:
STRESS RESPONSE IN PATHOLOGICAL STATES:
1. Maintaining a deep plane of general anaesthesia using volatile anaesthetics. This dose of volatile anaesthetics required to block the cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation may result in profound cardiovascular depression. The volatile agents used are Halothane, Isoflurane and Sevoflurane.
2. Local anaesthetics. Lignocaine is used. a) It is given as viscous gargle for oropharyngeal anaesthesia. b) aerosol for intratracheal anaesthesia c) intravenous d) local instillation or topical spray over the vocal cords. e) Regional nerve blocks
3. Vasodilators –Nitroglycerine Sodium Nitroprusside Hydralazine
4. Magnesium sulphate 11
5. Narcotics –Fentanyl, Sufentanil, Remifentanil, Morphine, Pethidine. Fentanyl is the most commonly used narcotic.It is a potent analgesic, has a short duration of action, does not increase intracranial tension and has minimal circulatory changes.
6. Calcium channel blockers- Nifedipine, Nicardipine, Verapamil, Diltiazem
7. Adrenergic blockers –Beta blocker-Metoprolol, Esmolol -Alpha blocker-Phentolamine Alpha and beta blocker-Labetalol
8. Central sympatholytics-Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine. They act by decreasing central sympathetic outflow.
9. Sedatives and anxiolytics.
Baseline Hemodynamic Parameters
Table 1: Basal Heart Rate:
Group |
N |
Mean |
SD |
P |
30 |
79.80 |
14.44 |
E |
30 |
86.67 |
9.79 |
M |
30 |
81.47 |
14.47 |
P value = 0.112. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal heart rate between the three groups.
Table 2: Basal Systolic Pressure:
Group |
N |
Mean |
SD |
P |
30 |
125.73 |
10.72 |
E |
30 |
123.13 |
8.69 |
M |
30 |
125.90 |
11.12 |
P value = 0.504. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal systolic pressure between the three groups.
Table 3: Basal Diastolic Pressure:
Group |
N |
Mean |
SD |
P |
30 |
81.33 |
6.70 |
E |
30 |
80.00 |
6.50 |
M |
30 |
81.33 |
8.12 |
p value = 0.707. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal diastolic pressure between the three groups.
Table 4: Basal Mean Arterial Pressure
Group |
N |
Mean |
SD |
P |
30 |
95.93 |
7.46 |
E |
30 |
94.07 |
6.60 |
M |
30 |
96.00 |
8.81 |
p value = 0.544. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal mean arterial pressure between the three groups
.
Table 5: Heart Rate changes
Group |
P |
E |
M |
P value |
Baseline |
79.80±14.44 |
86.67±9.79 |
81.47±14.47 |
0.112 |
After premedication |
79.83±13.05 |
86.63±14.30 |
84.53±16.50 |
0.191 |
After test drug |
77.30±11.30 |
77.70±13.14 |
93.27±18.45 |
0.001 |
Immediately after intubation |
103.63±12.31 |
90.67±13.93 |
97.40±12.57 |
0.001 |
1 min after intubation |
95.87±12.86 |
87.27±13.48 |
92.97±10.38 |
0.026 |
3 mins after intubation |
87.83±12.50 |
84.30±12.79 |
90.07±9.82 |
0.167 |
5 mins after intubation |
81.73±13.66 |
81.60±13.31 |
86.00±9.61 |
0.296 |
Table 6: SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES
Group |
P |
E |
M |
P value |
Baseline |
125.73±10.72 |
123.13±8.69 |
125.90±11.12 |
0.504 |
After premedication |
123.47±10.54 |
120.67±9.05 |
120.30±9.56 |
0.391 |
After test drug |
118.70±13.64 |
100.10±9.60 |
112.27±11.65 |
0.001 |
After induction |
109.97±13.63 |
107.70±9.23 |
98.97±9.74 |
0.001 |
Immediately after intubation |
138.57±17.25 |
114.43±8.76 |
124.90±17.76 |
0.001 |
1 min after intubation |
128.73±17.04 |
107.60±9.23 |
116.80±15.66 |
0.001 |
3 mins after intubation |
119.13±16.16 |
102.60±9.61 |
109.80±14.75 |
0.001 |
5 mins after intubation |
111.23±14.34 |
100.20±9.44 |
105.47±10.84 |
0.002 |
Table 7: DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES (mmHg)
Group |
P |
E |
M |
P value |
Baseline |
81.33±6.70 |
80.00±6.50 |
81.33±8.12 |
0.707 |
After premedication |
78.40±6.89 |
76.33±5.82 |
77.30±8.61 |
0.541 |
After test drug |
76.93±7.38 |
61.90±8.22 |
69.70±9.63 |
0.001 |
After induction |
71.27±10.28 |
67.63±8.05 |
59.30±9.79 |
0.001 |
Immediately after intubation |
93.60±12.49 |
74.73±8.29 |
83.13±16.74 |
0.001 |
1 min after intubation |
85.77±12.16 |
67.53±9.97 |
76.17±15.94 |
0.001 |
3 mins after intubation |
79.80±12.27 |
62.63±10.19 |
71.07±14.29 |
0.001 |
5 mins after intubation |
72.63±10.20 |
60.00±9.93 |
67.10±12.20 |
0.001 |
Table 8: MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE CHANGES (mmHg)
Group |
P |
E |
M |
P value |
Baseline |
95.93±7.46 |
94.07±6.60 |
96.00±8.81 |
0.544 |
After premedication |
93.20±7.49 |
90.63±6.76 |
91.30±8.73 |
0.412 |
After test drug |
90.77±8.56 |
74.30±7.78 |
83.30±9.84 |
0.001 |
After induction |
84.00±10.36 |
81.00±7.34 |
72.23±9.34 |
0.001 |
Immediately after intubation |
108.10±14.19 |
87.70±8.01 |
96.87±16.72 |
0.001 |
1 min after intubation |
100.10±13.49 |
80.67±9.19 |
89.97±15.64 |
0.001 |
3 mins after intubation |
92.77±13.17 |
75.70±9.01 |
84.00±13.79 |
0.001 |
5 mins after intubation |
85.30±11.17 |
73.30±8.69 |
79.50±10.73 |
0.00184.00±10.36 |
Table 9: LARYNGOSCOPY DURATION:
Group |
N |
Mean |
SD |
P |
30 |
13.23 |
2.34 |
E |
30 |
12.87 |
2.45 |
M |
30 |
13.83 |
2.93 |
Laryngoscopy and intubation can produce haemodynamic stress response charecterised by hypertension and tachycardia. It can also produce increase in intracranial pressure. No drug can attenuate this response completely. Many drugs have been reported to attenuate this response.
A.A.Vandenberg et al. 1 in October 2003, studied attenuation of haemodynamic response in Magnesium Sulphate pretreated patients undergoing cataract surgery. They compared Esmolol and MgSO4.They concluded that Esmolol 4mg/kg prevented increase in heart rate and rate pressure product. Mg SO4 40 mg/kg did not prevent response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
SapnaBathla, Santhoshkumar et al. 4 in 2003, compared efficacy of IV Esmolol Diltiazem and Magnesium Sulphate, in attenuating haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Their study showed that MgSo4 produced tachycardia and failed to attenuate rise in heart rate. Esmolol prevented rise in heart rate though rise in blood pressure was suppressed but not prevented. 62 In our study, comparison of Esmolol 1.5mg/kg, MgSo4 50mg/kg and placebo was done in attenuating haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
The data was analysed using Microsoft Excel. Haemodynamic variables were represented by mean and standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed by use of ANOVA and Pearson chi square test. TUKEYS HSD was applied to evaluate inter group comparisons.
P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
From this study, it is concluded that hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy and intubation can be attenuated by giving intravenous Esmolol 1.5mg/kg. Esmolol is effective in blunting the response followed by Magnesium Sulphate which blunts the hypertensive response but produces tachycardia during infusion of the drug. Placebo was ineffective in blunting hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation.