Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
153 Views
31 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 5 (May, 2025) | Pages 99 - 102
Comparison of Magnesium Sulphate and Esmolol for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Elective ENT Procedures
 ,
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Alluri Sitarama Raju Academy of Medical Sciences, Eluru, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh 534005, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Anantapuramu, Andhra Pradesh – 515001, India
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government medical college, Nizambad, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 18, 2025
Revised
March 15, 2025
Accepted
April 22, 2025
Published
May 7, 2025
Abstract

Background: The induction of anaesthesia, laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation and surgical stimulation evoke cardiovascular responses leading to alteration in heart rate, cardiac rhythm and blood pressure. The response starts in 5 seconds, peaks within 1-2 minutes and returns to baseline in 5 minutes. The goal is to compare the effectiveness of Esmolol and Magnesium Sulphate for attenuation of haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Materials and Methods: After approval from the ASRAMS Institutional Ethics Committee, the procedure was clearly explained to patients and informed written consent was obtained. The study was conducted during the period, April 2024- March 2025 at ASRAM General and Super-Specialty Hospital, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. 90 patients of age group 15 to 60 yrs of ASA physical status I and II who underwent elective ENT surgery under general anesthesia were selected and randomly allocated into 3 groups. Baseline heart rate and blood pressure was measured. They were premedicated with Inj. Glycopyrrolate 0.2mg and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg intramuscular 45 minutes before surgery. Patients were then shifted into the theatre. Inj. Fentanyl 2µg/kg was given 5 minutes before intubation to all patients. They were induced with Inj. Propofol 2mg/kg and Vecuronium 0.1mg/kg. Group M received Inj. Magnesium Sulphate 50mg/kg in 100ml of normal saline infusion over 10 minutes before induction. Group P received 15ml of normal saline 5 minutes before induction. Group E received Esmolol 1.5mg/kg in 15ml normal saline over 15-20 seconds one minute after vecuronium and intubation was done after 2 minutes.  Group P received 15ml of normal saline 5 minutes before induction. The heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were recorded baseline, after premedication, one min after test drug, after induction, immediately after intubation, thereafter 1, 3 and 5 minutes following intubation. Laryngoscopy duration was noted. Results: 1) Group E showed maximum attenuation of heart rate and blood pressure. 2) Group M also showed significant attenuation of blood pressure response but produced tachycardia on infusion of the drug. Heart rate response was not statistically significant compared to group E. 3) All patients recovered well.  4) Incidence of side effects was not significant between the groups. Conclusion: From this study, it is concluded that hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy and intubation can be attenuated by giving intravenous Esmolol 1.5mg/kg. Esmolol is effective in blunting the response followed by Magnesium Sulphate which blunts the hypertensive response but produces tachycardia during infusion of the drug. Placebo was ineffective in blunting hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation..

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Reflex sympathetic discharge caused by epipharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal stimulation producing significant increase in heart rate and arterial pressure. The haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation should be attenuated to balance myocardial oxygen supply and demand especially in coronary artery disease patients. It is also hazardous in patients with cerebrovascular disease, intracranial pathology and hyperactive airways.

 

CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSE:

Hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia and dysrhythmias mediated by autonomic nervous system occurs. Hypertension, tachycardia, increase in cardiac work and oxygen consumption are mediated by sympathetic afferents via the cardioaccelerator fibres and sympathetic 8 chain ganglia. The polysynaptic pathway from 9th and 10th nerve afferents to sympathetic nervous system in the brain stem and spinal cord results in a diffuse autonomic response which includes widespread release of norepinephrine from the adrenergic terminals and release of epinephrine from the adrenal medulla.

 

RESPIRATORY SYSTEM:

  1. Reflex glottis closure-laryngospasm
  2. Decreases dead space
  3. Increased airway resistance
  4. Bronchospasm

STRESS RESPONSE IN PATHOLOGICAL STATES:

  1. In patients with limited myocardial reserve, myocardial ischemia and failure can occur. It is essential to maintain the heart rate and blood pressure of the patient within 20% of the normal awake value. Heart rate should ideally be less than 110 beats per minute(ischemic threshold).
  2. Intracranial vascular anomalies can rupture.
  3. In patients with hyperactive airways bronchospasm and laryngospasm can occur.
  4. Laryngoscopy and intubation can increase cerebral blood flow if autoregulation is impaired. The resultant increase in intracranial pressure can lead to brainstem herniation and death.
MATERIALS AND METHODS

1.       Maintaining a deep plane of general anaesthesia using volatile anaesthetics. This dose of volatile anaesthetics required to block the cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation may result in profound cardiovascular depression. The volatile agents used are Halothane, Isoflurane and Sevoflurane.

2.       Local anaesthetics. Lignocaine is used. a) It is given as viscous gargle for oropharyngeal anaesthesia. b) aerosol for intratracheal anaesthesia c) intravenous d) local instillation or topical spray over the vocal cords. e) Regional nerve blocks

3.       Vasodilators –Nitroglycerine Sodium Nitroprusside Hydralazine

4.       Magnesium sulphate 11

5.       Narcotics –Fentanyl, Sufentanil, Remifentanil, Morphine, Pethidine. Fentanyl is the most commonly used narcotic.It is a potent analgesic, has a short duration of action, does not increase intracranial tension and has minimal circulatory changes.

6.       Calcium channel blockers- Nifedipine, Nicardipine, Verapamil, Diltiazem

7.       Adrenergic blockers –Beta blocker-Metoprolol, Esmolol -Alpha blocker-Phentolamine Alpha and beta blocker-Labetalol

8.       Central sympatholytics-Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine. They act by decreasing central sympathetic outflow.

9.       Sedatives and anxiolytics.

RESULTS

Baseline Hemodynamic Parameters

Table 1: Basal Heart Rate:

Group

N

Mean

SD

P

30

79.80

14.44

E

30

86.67

9.79

M

30

81.47

14.47

P value = 0.112. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal heart rate between the three groups.

 

Table 2: Basal Systolic Pressure:

Group

N

Mean

SD

P

30

125.73

10.72

E

30

123.13

8.69

M

30

125.90

11.12

P value = 0.504. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal systolic pressure between the three groups.

 

Table 3: Basal Diastolic Pressure:

Group

N

Mean

SD

P

30

81.33

6.70

E

30

80.00

6.50

M

30

81.33

8.12

p value = 0.707. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal diastolic pressure between the three groups.

 

Table 4: Basal Mean Arterial Pressure

Group

N

Mean

SD

P

30

95.93

7.46

E

30

94.07

6.60

M

30

96.00

8.81

p value = 0.544. Hence there is no statistical significance in basal mean arterial pressure between the three groups

 

.

 

Table 5: Heart Rate changes

Group

P

E

M

P value

Baseline

79.80±14.44

86.67±9.79

81.47±14.47

0.112

After premedication

79.83±13.05

86.63±14.30

84.53±16.50

0.191

After test drug

77.30±11.30

77.70±13.14

93.27±18.45

0.001

Immediately after intubation

103.63±12.31

90.67±13.93

97.40±12.57

0.001

1 min after intubation

95.87±12.86

87.27±13.48

92.97±10.38

0.026

3 mins after intubation

87.83±12.50

84.30±12.79

90.07±9.82

0.167

5 mins after intubation

81.73±13.66

81.60±13.31

86.00±9.61

0.296

 

Table 6: SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES

Group

P

E

M

P value

Baseline

125.73±10.72

123.13±8.69

125.90±11.12

0.504

After premedication

123.47±10.54

120.67±9.05

120.30±9.56

0.391

After test drug

118.70±13.64

100.10±9.60

112.27±11.65

0.001

After induction

109.97±13.63

107.70±9.23

98.97±9.74

0.001

Immediately after intubation

138.57±17.25

114.43±8.76

124.90±17.76

0.001

1 min after intubation

128.73±17.04

107.60±9.23

116.80±15.66

0.001

3 mins after intubation

119.13±16.16

102.60±9.61

109.80±14.75

0.001

5 mins after intubation

111.23±14.34

100.20±9.44

105.47±10.84

0.002

 

 

 

Table 7: DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES (mmHg)

Group

P

E

M

P value

Baseline

81.33±6.70

80.00±6.50

81.33±8.12

0.707

After premedication

78.40±6.89

76.33±5.82

77.30±8.61

0.541

After test drug

76.93±7.38

61.90±8.22

69.70±9.63

0.001

After induction

71.27±10.28

67.63±8.05

59.30±9.79

0.001

Immediately after intubation

93.60±12.49

74.73±8.29

83.13±16.74

0.001

1 min after intubation

85.77±12.16

67.53±9.97

76.17±15.94

0.001

3 mins after intubation

79.80±12.27

62.63±10.19

71.07±14.29

0.001

5 mins after intubation

72.63±10.20

60.00±9.93

67.10±12.20

0.001

 

Table 8: MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE CHANGES (mmHg)

Group

P

E

M

P value

Baseline

95.93±7.46

94.07±6.60

96.00±8.81

0.544

After premedication

93.20±7.49

90.63±6.76

91.30±8.73

0.412

After test drug

90.77±8.56

74.30±7.78

83.30±9.84

0.001

After induction

84.00±10.36

81.00±7.34

72.23±9.34

0.001

Immediately after intubation

108.10±14.19

87.70±8.01

96.87±16.72

0.001

1 min after intubation

100.10±13.49

80.67±9.19

89.97±15.64

0.001

3 mins after intubation

92.77±13.17

75.70±9.01

84.00±13.79

0.001

5 mins after intubation

85.30±11.17

73.30±8.69

79.50±10.73

0.00184.00±10.36

 

Table 9: LARYNGOSCOPY DURATION:

Group

N

Mean

SD

P

30

13.23

2.34

E

30

12.87

2.45

M

30

13.83

2.93

DISCUSSION

Laryngoscopy and intubation can produce haemodynamic stress response charecterised by hypertension and tachycardia. It can also produce increase in intracranial pressure. No drug can attenuate this response completely. Many drugs have been reported to attenuate this response.

 

A.A.Vandenberg et al. 1 in October 2003, studied attenuation of haemodynamic response in Magnesium Sulphate pretreated patients undergoing cataract surgery. They compared Esmolol and MgSO4.They concluded that Esmolol 4mg/kg prevented increase in heart rate and rate pressure product. Mg SO4 40 mg/kg did not prevent response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

 SapnaBathla, Santhoshkumar et al. 4 in 2003, compared efficacy of IV Esmolol Diltiazem and Magnesium Sulphate, in attenuating haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Their study showed that MgSo4 produced tachycardia and failed to attenuate rise in heart rate. Esmolol prevented rise in heart rate though rise in blood pressure was suppressed but not prevented. 62 In our study, comparison of Esmolol 1.5mg/kg, MgSo4 50mg/kg and placebo was done in attenuating haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

 

The data was analysed using Microsoft Excel. Haemodynamic variables were represented by mean and standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed by use of ANOVA and Pearson chi square test. TUKEYS HSD was applied to evaluate inter group comparisons.

P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

From this study, it is concluded that hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy and intubation can be attenuated by giving intravenous Esmolol 1.5mg/kg. Esmolol is effective in blunting the response followed by Magnesium Sulphate which blunts the hypertensive response but produces tachycardia during infusion of the drug.  Placebo was ineffective in blunting hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

REFERENCES
  1. Attenuation of cardiovascular responses to direct laryngoscopy and intubation-A comparative study between iv bolus fentanyl, lignocaine and placebo(NS) Gurulingappa Gurulingappa, Aleem MA, Awati MN, Adarsh S. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/23373043. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6:1749–1752. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4070.2619.
  2. Comparison of intravenous magnesium sulphate and lidocaine for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in elective surgical patients at Zewditu Memorial Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Misganaw A, Sitote M, Jemal S, et al. PLoS One. 2021;16:252465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252465.
  3. Different doses of intravenous magnesium sulfate on cardiovascular changes following the laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Honarmand A, Safavi M, Badiei S, Daftari-Fard N. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418140/J Res Pharm Pract. 2015;4:79–84. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.154365
  4. A comparative study between dexmedetomidine, clonidine and magnesium sulfate in attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation - a randomised study. Borah B, Shukla MI, Joshi NK. https://www.ijca.in/article-details/3669Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2017;4:30–36.
  5. Effects of lidocaine and magnesium sulfate in attenuating hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Mendonça FT, de Queiroz LM, Guimarães CC, Xavier AC. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017;67:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.004.
  6. Nebulised fentanyl, dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a double-blinded, randomised comparative study. Grover N, Taneja R, Rashid Y, Shrivastava N. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:730–735. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_397_22.
  7. Hussain AM, Sultan ST. Efficacy of fentanyl and esmolol in the prevention of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15:454-7
  8. Kumar S, Mishra MN, Mishra LS, Bathla S. Comparative study of the efficacy of i.v. esmolol, diltiazem and magnesium sulfate in attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Indian J anaesth. 2003;47(1):41-4.
  9. Gupta A, Wakhloo R, Gupta V, Mehta A, Kapoor BB. Comparison of Esmolol and Lignocaine for attenuation of cardiovascular stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. JK Science. 2009;11:78-81.
  10. Harris CE, Murray AM, Anderson JM, Grounds RM, Morgan M. Effects of thiopentanone, etomidate and propofol on the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Anesthesia. 1988;43:32-6.

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article
A Comparative Prospective Study on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Open Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
...
Published: 29/06/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Comparative Study of Metformin vs. Metformin Plus Pioglitazone on Lipid Profile and Insulin Sensitivity
...
Published: 25/05/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Study of Left Ventricular Dysfunctions in Patients with Hypothyroidism
...
Published: 28/06/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Study to Assess Health Related Quality of Life in Type Ii Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Rural Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State
...
Published: 14/11/2024
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.