Background: The Correlation between total serum calcium, ionic calcium, and the severity of birth asphyxia is an important area of research in neonatal care. Birth asphyxia remains a significant contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Among the various biochemical disturbances associated with hypoxic-ischemic events, calcium imbalance—especially hypocalcemia—plays a crucial role in worsening clinical outcomes. Aim: This study evaluates the correlation between total serum calcium, ionic calcium levels, in severity of birth asphyxia. Material and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over one year in the Department of Paediatrics at a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 80 term neonates were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group A (n=40) included neonates with birth asphyxia, and Group B (n=40) included healthy term neonates. Total serum calcium was measured using the Arsenazo III method, and ionized calcium was assessed using an ion-selective electrode technique. Blood samples were collected within six hours of life. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean total serum calcium in the asphyxiated group was 7.12 ± 0.65 mg/dL, significantly lower than 8.42 ± 0.52 mg/dL in controls (p<0.001). Hypocalcemia (<7 mg/dL) was observed in 45% of Group A versus 5% in Group B. The mean ionized calcium level in Group A was 0.92 ± 0.14 mmol/L, significantly lower than 1.15 ± 0.12 mmol/L in Group B (p<0.001), with 60% of Group A showing ionized hypocalcemia compared to 10% in controls. A significant positive correlation was found between Apgar scores at 5 minutes and both total calcium (r=0.48, p=0.002) and ionized calcium (r=0.52, p<0.001). Conclusion: Neonates with birth asphyxia exhibit significantly lower levels of both total and ionized calcium compared to healthy neonates. The high prevalence of hypocalcemia and its association with lower Apgar scores highlight the need for routine calcium monitoring and timely correction to improve neonatal outcomes.
Birth asphyxia is one of the leading causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It results from a lack of oxygen (hypoxia) and/or inadequate blood flow (ischemia) to the foetus or newborn during the perinatal period. This critical condition can lead to multi-organ dysfunction and has profound effects on the neonatal metabolic profile, including disturbances in electrolyte levels such as calcium. The evaluation of calcium homeostasis, especially both total serum calcium and ionized calcium, is essential in understanding the biochemical consequences of birth asphyxia and guiding appropriate clinical interventions.1 Neonatal hypocalcemia is a common biochemical abnormality observed in asphyxiated neonates. It can occur early (within the first 72 hours) or late (after 72 hours) and often presents without specific clinical symptoms, making routine biochemical monitoring indispensable. Calcium plays a vital role in cellular signaling, muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release, and cardiac rhythm regulation. The two primary components of serum calcium include total calcium, which comprises both bound and unbound fractions, and ionized calcium, which is the biologically active and physiologically significant component. Of the total calcium present in serum, approximately 50% exists in the ionized form, 40% is protein-bound (mostly to albumin), and the remaining 10% is complexed with anions.2 Birth asphyxia leads to a cascade of metabolic derangements, including hypoxia-induced acidosis and disturbances in parathyroid hormone function, which are implicated in the pathogenesis of hypocalcemia. The hypoxic state impairs calcium mobilization from bones and reduces intestinal calcium absorption, while also causing an increase in phosphate levels that further suppress calcium concentrations. Moreover, the stress response to asphyxia, accompanied by elevated catecholamines and glucocorticoids, contributes to altered calcium metabolism. These changes are more effectively reflected by measuring ionized calcium levels, which are more sensitive to acute physiological variations than total serum calcium.3 Clinical and biochemical profiling of neonates with birth asphyxia has shown significant derangements in electrolytes, particularly calcium and glucose levels. Early identification and correction of these abnormalities are critical to improving outcomes in affected neonates. Studies have suggested that hypocalcemia in birth asphyxia may worsen the neurological status by exacerbating seizure activity and contributing to cardiac dysfunction. Therefore, quantifying both total and ionized calcium offers a more comprehensive picture of the neonate’s calcium status and can serve as a useful prognostic indicator.4 In recent years, efforts to improve neonatal outcomes have focused not only on prompt resuscitative measures but also on post-resuscitation metabolic support. Birth asphyxia remains a major contributor to early neonatal deaths, particularly in resource-limited settings. Global initiatives aimed at reducing perinatal mortality emphasize early recognition of birth asphyxia and immediate supportive care, which includes correction of metabolic imbalances like hypoglycemia and hypocalcemia. These interventions are vital because a significant proportion of deaths in asphyxiated neonates occur within the first few days of life.5 The use of specific scoring systems such as the Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) score aids in classifying the severity of asphyxia and can correlate with biochemical abnormalities. Higher HIE grades have been associated with more pronounced metabolic disturbances, including lower calcium levels. Furthermore, clinical studies conducted in diverse populations have indicated a consistent association between birth asphyxia and decreased calcium concentrations, thereby reaffirming the importance of biochemical surveillance in such neonates.6
The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying neonatal hypocalcemia in asphyxiated infants are multifactorial. They may involve immature parathyroid hormone responses, elevated phosphate levels due to cellular injury, magnesium deficiency, and renal losses of calcium. These factors are exacerbated by prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction, which are frequently coexistent with birth asphyxia. Although total serum calcium has traditionally been measured in clinical settings, it may not accurately reflect the physiologically active calcium pool in critically ill neonates. In contrast, ionized calcium provides real-time assessment of calcium bioavailability and is less influenced by serum albumin levels or pH changes.7
Monitoring and comparing both total and ionized calcium in neonates with birth asphyxia is crucial for establishing the degree of metabolic compromise and guiding timely therapeutic interventions. The evidence suggests that relying solely on total calcium may result in underdiagnosis of functionally significant hypocalcemia. Early detection through comprehensive biochemical analysis can facilitate appropriate calcium supplementation and potentially mitigate the risk of long-term complications such as neurodevelopmental delay and cardiac dysfunction.8
AIM AND OBJECTIVES
Aim: The aim of this study was to correlation the total serum calcium and ionized calcium levels between term neonates with birth asphyxia and healthy controls in order to assess any potential biochemical alterations in calcium metabolism associated with birth asphyxia.
Objectives:
Study Design: This was a prospective observational study aimed at correlation total serum calcium and ionized calcium levels between term neonates with birth asphyxia and healthy controls.
Study Population: A total of 80 term neonates were included in the study and divided into two groups:
Study Place
The study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Vyas Medical College & Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Study Duration
The study was conducted over a period of one year and six months, from January 2024 to June 2025.
Inclusion Criteria
Group A (Cases):
Group B (Controls):
Exclusion Criteria (Applicable to Both Groups)
Ethical Considerations
Study Procedure
Outcome Measures
Statistical Analysis
The data collected during the study were analyzed using statistical software (such as SPSS version 22.0 software). The following statistical methods were employed to assess and compare the parameters:
Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Neonates (N = 80)
Variable |
Group A (Cases) (n=40) |
Group B (Controls) (n=40) |
Total (N=80) |
P-value |
Mean Gestational Age (weeks) |
38.4 ± 1.1 |
38.6 ± 1.0 |
38.5 ± 1.0 |
0.372 |
Mean Birth Weight (kg) |
2.70 ± 0.35 |
2.85 ± 0.32 |
2.77 ± 0.34 |
0.048* |
Male : Female Ratio |
23:17 |
21:19 |
44:36:00 |
0.654 |
Mode of Delivery (CS : NVD) |
26:14:00 |
24:16:00 |
50:30:00 |
0.651 |
*Statistically significant (p<0.05)
Table 1 shows that baseline characteristics between the two groups—birth asphyxia cases (Group A) and healthy controls (Group B)—were comparable in terms of gestational age, gender distribution, and mode of delivery. In the present study involving 80 neonates, the demographic characteristics of cases (Group A, n = 40) and controls (Group B, n = 40) were compared. The mean gestational age was similar between the two groups, with 38.4 ± 1.1 weeks in the cases and 38.6 ± 1.0 weeks in the controls, showing no statistically significant difference (P = 0.372). However, the mean birth weight was found to be significantly lower in neonates with birth asphyxia (2.70 ± 0.35 kg) compared to healthy neonates (2.85 ± 0.32 kg), and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.048). The male-to-female ratio was comparable between Group A (23:17) and Group B (21:19), with no significant difference (P = 0.654). Similarly, the mode of delivery (cesarean section versus normal vaginal delivery) did not differ significantly between the two groups, with 26:14 in cases and 24:16 in controls (P = 0.651). These findings indicate that both groups were demographically comparable except for birth weight, which was significantly lower in the asphyxiated neonates.
Table 2: Apgar Scores at 1 and 5 Minutes
Apgar Score |
Group A (Cases) (n=40) |
Group B (Controls) (n=40) |
P-value |
Mean Apgar Score at 1 min |
4.2 ± 0.9 |
8.6 ± 0.7 |
<0.001* |
Mean Apgar Score at 5 min |
5.8 ± 0.7 |
9.2 ± 0.5 |
<0.001* |
*Highly significant difference between groups
Table 2 and figure I, shows that Apgar scores at both 1 minute and 5 minutes post-delivery were significantly lower in neonates with birth asphyxia compared to healthy controls. The mean Apgar score at 1 minute was 4.2 ± 0.9 in Group A and 8.6 ± 0.7 in Group B (p<0.001), and at 5 minutes, it was 5.8 ± 0.7 in Group A versus 9.2 ± 0.5 in Group B (p<0.001). These highly significant differences validate the clinical classification of the asphyxiated group and confirm the degree of perinatal compromise.
Table 3: Total Serum Calcium Levels in Neonates
Parameter Group A (Cases) |
Group A (Cases) (n=40) |
Group B (Controls) (n=40) |
P-value |
Mean Total Serum Calcium (mg/dL) |
7.12 ± 0.65 |
8.42 ± 0.52 |
<0.001* |
Range |
5.9 – 8.1 |
7.5 – 9.5 |
|
Neonates with Hypocalcemia (<7 mg/dL) |
18 (45.0%) |
2 (5.0%) |
<0.001* |
*Statistically significant
Table 3 shows that substantial and statistically significant reduction in total serum calcium levels was observed among neonates with birth asphyxia. The mean total serum calcium in Group A was 7.12 ± 0.65 mg/dL, significantly lower than 8.42 ± 0.52 mg/dL in Group B (p<0.001). Additionally, 45% of neonates in the asphyxiated group had hypocalcemia (defined as total serum calcium <7 mg/dL), compared to only 5% in the control group (p<0.001). These findings suggest that hypocalcemia is a frequent biochemical abnormality in asphyxiated neonates, likely due to impaired calcium homeostasis from perinatal hypoxia.
Table 4: Ionized Calcium Levels in Neonates
Parameter |
Group A (Cases) (n=40) |
Group B (Controls) (n=40) |
P-value |
Mean Ionized Calcium (mmol/L) |
0.92 ± 0.14 |
1.15 ± 0.12 |
<0.001* |
Range |
0.68 – 1.20 |
0.98 – 1.30 |
|
Neonates with Ionized Hypocalcemia (<1.0 mmol/L) |
24 (60.0%) |
4 (10.0%) |
<0.001* |
*Statistically significant
Table 4 shows thatIonized calcium levels were also significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B. The mean ionized calcium concentration in the asphyxiated neonates was 0.92 ± 0.14 mmol/L, while it was 1.15 ± 0.12 mmol/L in healthy controls (p<0.001). Ionized hypocalcemia (defined as ionized calcium <1.0 mmol/L) was present in 60% of asphyxiated neonates but only in 10% of controls, a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). Since ionized calcium represents the physiologically active form of calcium, this deficiency could contribute to neuromuscular and cardiovascular instability in affected neonates.
Table 5: Correlation between Apgar score and Calcium Levels (Group A only)
Correlation |
r-value |
P-value |
Apgar Score (5 min) vs Total Serum Calcium |
0.48 |
0.002* |
Apgar Score (5 min) vs Ionized Calcium |
0.52 |
<0.001* |
Table 5 shows that significant positive correlation was found between Apgar scores at 5 minutes and both total serum calcium (r=0.48, p=0.002) and ionized calcium levels (r=0.52, p<0.001) in the asphyxiated group. This indicates that neonates with lower Apgar scores tend to have lower calcium levels, reflecting a possible relationship between the severity of birth asphyxia and disruption of calcium metabolism. These findings emphasize the importance of early calcium monitoring and correction in neonates with low Apgar scores to potentially improve outcomes.
In our study, in terms of gestational age, both groups were comparable, with the mean gestational age in Group A being 38.4 ± 1.1 weeks and in Group B being 38.6 ± 1.0 weeks. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.372), suggesting that gestational maturity was similar in both groups. This aligns with the findings of Bhat et al. (2016) and Narayan et al. (2013), who noted that most cases of birth asphyxia occurred in term neonates.8,9 The mean birth weight was significantly lower in the asphyxiated group (2.70 ± 0.35 kg) compared to controls (2.85 ± 0.32 kg), with a statistically significant p-value of 0.048. Lower birth weight has been previously reported as a risk factor for birth asphyxia due to poor physiological reserves and immature organ systems (Kumar et al., 2017).10 These findings are supported by studies such as Rathod et al. (2018), which demonstrated a higher incidence of birth asphyxia in neonates with lower birth weights.11 This trend was similarly reported by Raiet al (2015), where asphyxiated neonates had lower average birth weights compared to controls.12 Although gestational age, sex ratio, and mode of delivery did not differ significantly in our study, Allen et al (2011) noted that even in term neonates, lower birth weight could be a critical predictor of vulnerability to hypoxic-ischemic injury due to impaired placental nutrient supply.13 Our data show a mean Apgar score of 4.2 ± 0.9 at 1 minute and 5.8 ± 0.7 at 5 minutes in the asphyxiated group, significantly lower than 8.6 ± 0.7 and 9.2 ± 0.5, respectively, in controls (p<0.001 for both). These results confirm the clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe birth asphyxia in Group A. Jayaprakash and Murali (2014) also observed similarly low Apgar scores among asphyxiated neonates in their study, with an average 1-minute score of 4.5 and 5-minute score of 6.1.14 Yoneda et al (2005) emphasized that lower Apgar scores at 5 minutes strongly correlate with poorer neonatal outcomes and increased risk of hypocalcemia and other metabolic complications.15 The mean total serum calcium in the asphyxiated group was 7.12 ± 0.65 mg/dL, significantly lower than 8.42 ± 0.52 mg/dL in the control group (p<0.001). Hypocalcemia (total calcium <7 mg/dL) was present in 45% of asphyxiated neonates, compared to only 5% in controls. Rai et al (2015) found the mean total calcium in asphyxiated neonates to be 7.0 mg/dL, while in controls it was 8.5 mg/dL, confirming the trend seen in our study. These comparisons highlight that neonatal hypocalcemia is a consistent finding across various populations and settings in the context of perinatal asphyxia.12 In a study by Alphonsus (2011), 47% of neonates with severe birth asphyxia were hypocalcemic, nearly identical to our findings.16
A mean ionized calcium level of 0.92 ± 0.14 mmol/L in asphyxiated neonates versus 1.15 ± 0.12 mmol/L in controls (p<0.001), with 60% of asphyxiated neonates having ionized hypocalcemia (<1.0 mmol/L) compared to 10% of controls. These values are closely aligned with those reported by Jain et al (2000), who found a mean ionized calcium of 0.91 mmol/L in neonates with asphyxia.17 In a similar study, Lila et al (2015) noted a mean ionized calcium of 0.88 mmol/L in neonates with HIE, and they found a strong association between low ionized calcium and adverse neurological outcomes.18 Our findings reinforce that ionized calcium, rather than total calcium alone, should be routinely assessed in asphyxiated neonates, given its role in cardiac and neuromuscular stability. Our study showed a moderate positive correlation between Apgar score at 5 minutes and both total serum calcium (r = 0.48, p = 0.002) and ionized calcium (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) in the asphyxiated group. This indicates that lower Apgar scores are associated with more severe calcium deficiency. Basu et al (2010) similarly reported that calcium levels were directly proportional to the severity of asphyxia as assessed by Apgar scores and clinical staging of HIE.19Yonedaet al (2005) also suggested that ionized calcium levels measured within the first few hours of life could serve as a predictive marker for the severity of hypoxic injury and its potential neurological sequelae.15
This study demonstrates that both total serum calcium and ionized calcium levels are significantly lower in neonates with birth asphyxia compared to healthy controls. A high prevalence of hypocalcemia was observed in asphyxiated neonates, with a strong correlation between low Apgar scores and calcium deficiency. Early identification and correction of hypocalcemia may play a vital role in improving clinical outcomes. Routine monitoring of ionized calcium should be emphasized in the management of birth asphyxia.
Acknowledgement
We extend our heartfelt gratitude to the Department of Pediatrics, Vyas Medical College & Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India, for providing the necessary facilities and support to carry out this study. Special thanks to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit staff, the nursing staff and laboratory technicians for their cooperation. This study would not have been possible without the collective efforts and commitment of everyone involved.