Background: Over the past few decades there is an increase in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and is associated with a number of complications. Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) is used as the “gold standard” for measuring the glycemic control and is also used as predictor of diabetic complications. HbA1c levels is not only affected by the blood glucose levels alone. They are also changed in conditions like blood loss, hemolytic anaemia, pregnancy, chronic kidney diseases, vitamin B12 deficiency anaemia, splenectomy, hyperbilirubinemia, alcoholism and iron deficiency anaemia. As per WHO, iron deficiency is the commonest out of all deficiency diseases worldwide. Anemia is cited as a major confounding factor in the measurement of HbA1C. It was shown by few studies that patients with iron deficiency had higher HbA1C levels while few demonstrated that absolute HbA1c levels and mean HbA1c levels were lower in patients with iron deficiency anaemia. However, some studies showed no differences in HbA1c levels of patients with anaemia and healthy subjects. All these studies gave contradictory and inconsistent results. Thus, this study is conducted to know the effect of iron deficiency anaemia on glycosylated hemoglobin levels in non-diabetic individuals. Methods: 50 patients with iron deficiency anaemia and 50 healthy control subjects who were age and sex matched were registered in this study. Complete hemogram including peripheral smear, fasting and postprandial blood sugar levels, glycated hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels were measured in both the groups. Results: The prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia was more in females during the third and fourth decades of life. Mean HbA1c of iron deficiency anaemia patients (5.78 ± 1.08) was significantly higher than that of the control population (5.46 ± 0.26 ) that was statistically highly significant (p<0.001) Conclusion: Our study showed that HbA1c levels were affected by iron deficiency anemia. HbA1C values were higher in patients with iron deficiency anemia than control group. So iron deficiency anemia has to be taken into consideration before using the HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder caused by absolute or relative insulin deficiency, with increasing prevalence and associated complications worldwide (1). In India, about 10% of the population is affected. HbA1c is the gold standard for assessing glycemic control and predicting diabetic complications (2). It is recommended as a diagnostic tool by the American College of Endocrinology (ACE) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (3), reflecting average blood glucose over three months due to the lifespan of erythrocytes (4). ADA guidelines advise maintaining HbA1c below 7% to prevent complications, with levels above 7% indicating increased risk, especially for microvascular issues (5).
HbA1c testing offers advantages over glucose tests, including stability and reduced variation(6), though factors such as anemia, age, race, hemoglobinopathies, and certain conditions can affect HbA1c independent of glucose (7-10). Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common condition affecting HbA1c reliability. It is prevalent in India and globally, contributing significantly to health burdens(11), with IDA seen as a sequence from iron depletion to anemia (11).
Studies indicate that IDA can alter HbA1c levels due to effects on erythrocyte turnover, either lowering or raising HbA1c values (12,13). Some studies report higher HbA1c in IDA patients, with levels decreasing after anemia correction (14-16), though findings are mixed (17,18). Given these inconsistencies, this study aims to explore the effects of IDA on HbA1c, highlighting the need for alternative glycemic markers in anemic populations.
Research indicates that IDA can artificially raise HbA1c levels, potentially leading to misleading interpretations of glycemic control:
HbA1c’s limitations in anemia and conditions that alter red blood cell turnover necessitate cautious interpretation, potentially requiring alternative markers in these cases. HbA1c remains a valuable tool, but factors like iron status must be considered for accurate diabetes classification and management.
Ethics-approved recruitment of patients with anemia symptoms from the General Medicine Department of SNMC and HSK Hospital were considered considered for this study. Age and sex-matched healthy individuals served as controls. Informed consent was obtained.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Comprehensive history, clinical examination, and diagnostic confirmation of anemia via laboratory investigations.
Data Assessment and Statistical Analysis
Data was entered in Excel and analyzed using SPSS (v20). Quantitative data was reported using mean and standard deviation; qualitative data with frequencies and percentages. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare clinical parameters and assess diagnostic accuracy. Sample size was estimated based on a correlation coefficient of 0.593 (Sinha et al., 2012) with MedCalc Software, aiming for 99% confidence and 80% power.
Sl. No. |
Mean values |
STUDYGROUP (n=50) |
CONTROL GROUP(n=50) |
p Value |
1 |
Age |
38.74 |
39.24 |
0.364 |
2 |
Sex (n) Male Female |
16 34 |
16 34 |
0.146 |
3 |
Mean FBS(mg/dl) |
90.8800 |
88.0000 |
0.099 |
4 |
Mean PPBS(mg/dl) |
121.6260 |
114.6200 |
0.052 |
Table 1: Patient characteristics |
The study and control groups had comparable age and sex distributions, as well as similar mean fasting blood sugar (FBS) and postprandial blood sugar (PPBS) levels.
Sl. No. |
Mean Values |
Study group (n=50) |
Control group (n=50) |
1 |
HB |
6.4140 |
13.4000 |
2 |
MCV(fL) |
61.2860 |
90.5680 |
3 |
MCH(pg/cell) |
19.684 |
28.080 |
4 |
FERRITIN(g/L) |
7.2008 |
239.2948 |
5 |
HBA1C |
5.7870 |
5.4660 |
Table 2: Comparison of Hematological and Iron Profile Parameters Between Study and Control Groups |
As anticipated, patients in the study group exhibited anemia, with significantly lower hemoglobin (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and serum ferritin levels, all of which were statistically significant.
The study group had a higher mean HbA1c (5.78%) compared to the control group (5.46%), which was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
|
Study Group |
Control Group |
Pearson Correlation coefficient |
-0.871 |
-0.043 |
p Value |
<0.001 |
0.76 |
Sample size |
50 |
50 |
Table 3: Result for correlation between Hb and Hba1c |
HbA1c levels showed a strong inverse correlation with hemoglobin levels in the IDA group (r = - 0.871, p = 0.001).
HbA1c, comprising approximately 5% of total hemoglobin in healthy individuals, is a reliable indicator of a patient’s average glycemic status over the past three months. It has gained recognition as a diagnostic tool for diabetes mellitus (DM) due to its high reproducibility and convenience, prompting recommendations for its use from organizations like the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE). However, it is essential to recognize that HbA1c provides an indirect measure of blood glucose, and various factors beyond chronic hyperglycemia, including iron deficiency anemia (IDA), can influence Hb glycation. Studies suggest that iron deficiency may affect HbA1c levels independently of blood glucose, which has important implications for the clinical management of diabetic patients who also suffer from anemia.
IDA is one of the most common types of anemia worldwide, affecting approximately 2.1 billion people globally, with prevalence rising in both developed and developing countries. High-risk groups include children, adolescents, and women. In India, where about 50% of anemia cases are attributed to iron deficiency, this condition coexists with high DM prevalence. Understanding the relationship between IDA and HbA1c is crucial to avoid misleading glycemic assessments in anemic patients.
This study aimed to examine the effects of IDA on HbA1c levels. The study involved 50 patients with IDA, with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls. The mean age of the study population was 41.46 years, and the majority (52%) were between 31-50 years old, with a higher prevalence of IDA in the 3rd and 4th decades of life. Women represented 68% of the study population, aligning with the fact that women are more prone to iron deficiency than men.
Our findings are consistent with studies by Kairavi Bhardwaj et al., who observed an inverse relationship between Hb and HbA1c in patients with IDA. Other studies, such as those by Abdullah Mahal Ghareep Alenazi et al(28)., also support the hypothesis that IDA is associated with increased HbA1c values, suggesting that factors beyond blood glucose levels can influence HbA1c readings in anemic patients. Shailendra Kumar Manjhvar et al(22). and Koga et al(29). further corroborate that IDA can lead to elevated HbA1c levels, which could mislead DM diagnoses if HbA1c alone is used.
In contrast, Vishal Kalasker et al. (26)reported a positive correlation between Hb and HbA1c in non- diabetic Indian adults with IDA, concluding that IDA may not significantly affect DM diagnosis using HbA1c based on ADA guidelines. However, the variance in study findings is often attributed to differences in laboratory methods for HbA1c measurement, as highlighted by Van Heyningen et al. and Rai et al.(18)
Iron deficiency is the most common nutritional disorder globally, affecting an estimated 2.1 billion people, or roughly 30% of the world population. HbA1c, considered the "gold standard" for monitoring glycemic control, is also used to predict diabetic complications. However, HbA1c levels are influenced by several non-glycemic factors, including iron deficiency anemia (IDA), which can lead to skewed interpretations of glycemic status.
This study aimed to explore the impact of IDA on HbA1c levels. The results confirmed that IDA is notably prevalent among women in the third and fourth decades of life. The study group showed significantly higher mean HbA1c levels (5.78%) compared to the control group (5.46%), with a highly significant p-value of <0.001. This indicates a strong association between IDA and elevated HbA1c levels.
Additionally, a significant negative correlation (r = -0.871, p < 0.001) was found between hemoglobin and HbA1c levels in the IDA group, suggesting that as hemoglobin levels decrease, HbA1c levels tend to increase, highlighting the inverse relationship between IDA and HbA1c levels.
The findings underscore the need to account for iron deficiency status when interpreting HbA1c levels in diabetic patients to avoid overestimating poor glycemic control. Iron replacement therapy in diabetic individuals with IDA is crucial for improving the accuracy of HbA1c determinations.
These limitations suggest the need for further longitudinal studies to comprehensively understand the effects of IDA correction on HbA1c levels.