Research Article |
Volume 15 Issue 1 (Jan - Feb, 2025) | Pages 423 - 426
Evaluating lipometabolic and clinical parameters in subclinical hypothyroidism: Evidence from a tertiary care centre in North India
1
Assistant Prof, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Srinagar, J&K, India
2
Associate Prof, Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Srinagar, J&K india
Abstract
Objective: Subclinical hypothyroidism (ScH), has been increasingly explored for its potential lipometabolic and vascular implications. Evidence remains inconsistent, with some studies suggesting adverse effects on lipid metabolism and vascular function, while others show no significant associations.. With regional variation in thyroid disorder prevalence and metabolic patterns across India, this study evaluated lipometabolic and related clinical markers in individuals with ScH in Kashmir. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on fifty patients with ScH and fifty age- and gender-matched euthyroid controls attending a tertiary care centre in Srinagar. Standardized procedures were used for anthropometry, blood pressure measurement, and biochemical analysis, including thyroid profile, lipid parameters, and fasting glucose. Statistical analysis employed independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson’s correlations, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Results: Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the ScH group were not significantly different from controls(p>0.05). Lipid and glycaemic parameters—including fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL, and LDL—also showed no significant differences.(p > 0.05) Wide variability in BMI, triglyceride and LDL levels suggested notable inter-individual differences. Findings indicate that ScH did not produce measurable alterations in the lipometabolic profile within this cohort. Conclusion: ScH was not associated with significant changes in blood pressure, lipid parameters, or BMI in this Kashmiri sample. Although these results support studies reporting minimal metabolic impact, conflicting evidence elsewhere highlights the importance of ongoing monitoring. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether progression of ScH contributes to future lipometabolic risk
Keywords
Complete Denture
Adaptation
Comfort Level
Satisfaction
Edentulism
Prosthodontics.
INTRODUCTION
The interplay between thyroid dysfunction and lipometabolic health continues to attract significant scientific attention [1,2]. Thyroid hormones play a crucial role in regulating basal metabolic rate, lipid turnover, vascular reactivity, and cardiac output, making even subtle hormonal disturbances potentially relevant to lipometabolic physiology. Consequently, conditions such as subclinical hypothyroidism (ScH)—characterized by elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with preserved thyroxine (T4) levels—are increasingly being evaluated for their long-term metabolic and vascular implications.[3]
Globally, lipometabolic abnormalities including dyslipedmia and insulin resistance remain one of the leading contributors to morbidity and mortality [4], underscoring the need to understand all possible contributing factors. While overt hypothyroidism is a well-established risk factor for dyslipidemia and hypertension, the evidence for ScH remains less consistent. Several studies have proposed that even mild thyroid dysfunction may impair lipid handling, reduce endothelial relaxation, and increase systemic vascular resistance. Others have failed to demonstrate such associations, leaving the clinical significance of ScH uncertain.[5-10]
In India, where thyroid disorders are relatively prevalent, little work has been done on the topic. [11] Data specific to regional populations—like those from Kashmir—are limited. Socioeconomic factors, dietary habits, altitude, and ethnicity may influence metabolic patterns, making regional research particularly valuable. The present study therefore aimed to assess the association of ScH with important lipometabolic risk markers in a Kashmiri population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was conducted on fifty individuals diagnosed with ScH and fifty age- and gender-matched euthyroid controls. Participants were recruited from the Medical OPD of Government Medical College, Srinagar, and assessments were conducted in the Departments of Biochemistry and General Medicine. Exclusion criteria were selected to minimize confounders and included chronic systemic disease, pregnancy, and the use of medications that might alter thyroid function or metabolic profile. Blood pressure measurements were carried out under controlled conditions to ensure accuracy. After a minimum rest period of ten minutes, systolic and diastolic values were recorded using a standardized sphygmomanometer. Anthropometric parameters—including height, weight, and waist circumference—were documented following universally accepted guidelines. Waist circumference was measured at the upper border of the iliac crest as recommended by the NIH.[12] Diagnosis of ScH relied on NHANES-based criteria, requiring normal circulating T4 levels (0.9–1.9 pg/dL) alongside an elevated TSH (≥4.12 mIU/L).[13] Clinical evaluation A structured, pretested questionnaire was administered to obtain demographic characteristics, past medical history, personal habits, and anthropometric details. This facilitated the identification of potential confounders that could influence lipometabolic risk markers, such as smoking status, diet, or family history. Laboratory analysis Fasting serum samples were collected in the early morning hours to minimize diurnal variation in thyroid and lipid parameters. Standard venipuncture techniques were followed using heparinized tubes, and samples were promptly processed and stored under recommended laboratory conditions to ensure biochemical stability and reliability. Thyroid function tests (TSH, T3, T4) were performed using a sensitive chemiluminescence immunoassay on the Abbott i1000 analyzer. This assay offers high specificity and reproducibility, particularly important for detecting subtle hormonal changes characteristic of ScH. Lipid parameters and fasting glucose levels were assessed via enzymatic methods on the Abbott c4000 analyzer, known for its analytical precision and reliability. Data Analysis Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS. Descriptive statistics summarized baseline characteristics, while Pearson’s correlation coefficient explored relationships between thyroid parameters and lipometabolic risk factors. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests evaluated group differences, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Ethical Considerations The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and ethical standards were strictly maintained throughout the study.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics were comparable between individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism (ScH) and euthyroid controls, minimizing the influence of demographic variability on study outcomes (Figure 1). The mean BMI of the ScH group was 23.72 ± 5.10 kg/m², while the euthyroid group showed a BMI of 25.57 ± 6.35 kg/m²; the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical details are summarized in Table 1. Blood pressure parameters did not differ significantly between groups. The ScH group demonstrated a mean systolic blood pressure of 118 ± 12.94 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure of 73.4 ± 7.45 mmHg, values comparable to those of the euthyroid controls (p > 0.05).
Biochemical analysis also revealed no statistically meaningful differences. In the ScH cohort, fasting blood sugar was 99.02 ± 28.90 mg/dL, triglycerides 166.32 ± 70.50 mg/dL, HDL 43.82 ± 11.44 mg/dL, and LDL 111.58 ± 95.14 mg/dL. Corresponding values among controls—99.3 ± 28.90 mg/dL, 151.06 ± 69.82 mg/dL, 43.28 ± 11.73 mg/dL, and 97.3 ± 34.18 mg/dL, respectively—were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Notably high standard deviations in triglyceride and LDL levels suggested considerable inter-individual variability in lipid indices across both groups.
Tables and figures
.
Fig I: Baseline characteristics of patients
| |
Cases
|
Controls
|
p value
|
|
Anthropometric details
|
|
|
|
|
Waist Circumference (cm)
|
86.98 ± 11.40
|
87.04 ± 9.05
|
0.977
|
|
BMI
|
25.57 ± 6.35
|
23.72 ± 5.10
|
0.11
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Biochemical findings
|
|
|
|
|
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl)
|
99.02 ± 28.90
|
91.3 ± 9.35
|
0.075
|
|
Total cholesterol (mg/dl)
|
165.28 ± 45.13
|
164.02 ± 42.52
|
0.886
|
|
Triglycerides (mg/dl)
|
166.32 ± 70.50
|
151.06 ± 69.82
|
0.279
|
|
HDL (mg/dl)
|
43.82 ± 11.44
|
43.28 ± 11.73
|
0.816
|
|
LDL (mg/dl
|
111.58 ± 95.14
|
97.3 ± 34.18
|
0.32
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Blood pressure
|
|
|
|
|
BP Systolic (mmHg)
|
118 ± 12.94
|
118.2 ± 13.04
|
0.939
|
|
BP Diastolic (mmHg)
|
73.4 ± 7.45
|
74.2 ± 8.10
|
0.609
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Hormonal tests
|
|
|
|
|
TSH (µIU/ml)
|
10.70 ± 14.65
|
2.27 ± 1.17
|
<0.001
|
|
T3 (ng/ml)
|
1.27 ± 0.35
|
1.31 ± 0.34
|
0.606
|
|
T4 (µgm/dl)
|
7.53 ± 1.90
|
7.92 ± 1.72
|
0.295
|
Table I : Lipometabolic, clinical and anthropometric parameters of study subjects
DISCUSSION
The present study found no significant differences across anthropometric, hemodynamic, or lipometabolic parameters between individuals with subclinical hypothyroidism (ScH) and euthyroid controls. These findings suggest that, within this Kashmiri cohort, mild thyroid dysfunction may not exert measurable short-term metabolic effects. This aligns with previous investigations reporting similar outcomes in populations with modest sample sizes or early-stage thyroid dysfunction [5].
Although thyroid hormones play a key role in regulating vascular tone, lipid turnover, and adrenergic responsiveness, the subtle hormonal changes characteristic of ScH may not be sufficient to cause detectable disturbances in blood pressure. The lack of significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in our study mirrors results from other clinical studies [5]. However, meta-analytic evidence indicates that small but meaningful increases in blood pressure may emerge in larger samples or over longer durations of thyroid dysfunction, suggesting that early alterations may fall below the threshold of detection in smaller cross-sectional analyses [7].
Similarly, the absence of significant lipid abnormalities in this study reflects the heterogeneity observed across the literature. Several studies have demonstrated increased LDL or triglycerides, or reduced HDL levels in ScH, supporting the hypothesis that even mild thyroid dysfunction may adversely influence lipid metabolism [14–16]. Conversely, multiple studies have reported no significant differences in lipid parameters between ScH and euthyroid groups, emphasizing the variability in metabolic expression of the condition [17–19]. Differences in dietary habits, iodine sufficiency, genetic background, assay sensitivity, and definitions of ScH may contribute to these inconsistent findings.
The wide standard deviations in triglyceride and LDL values observed in this cohort further highlight substantial inter-individual variability, which may obscure subtle group-level metabolic effects. Overall, the evidence suggests that the metabolic impact of ScH may be context-dependent, influenced by population characteristics, disease duration, and environmental or lifestyle factors. Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether the apparent metabolic neutrality in early ScH persists over time or whether progression to overt hypothyroidism leads to measurable lipometabolic alterations.
CONCLUSION
Overall, this study indicates that subclinical hypothyroidism may not significantly elevate lipometabolic risk markers such as BMI, LDL,TG, cholesterol, FBG, or blood pressure in the Kashmiri population studied. However, given the heterogeneity of findings across the literature and the plausible biological mechanisms linking thyroid dysfunction to lipometabolic health, regular follow-up remains advisable. Larger longitudinal studies would help clarify whether progression from ScH to overt hypothyroidism is associated with worsening lipometabolic parameters.
REFERENCES
1. Luo Y, Wu F, Huang Z, et al. Assessment of the relationship between subclinical hypothyroidism and blood lipid profile: reliable or not? Lipids Health Dis. 2022;21:137.
2. Wu K, Zhou Y, Ke S, et al. Lifestyle is associated with thyroid function in subclinical hypothyroidism: a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21:112.
3. Surks MI, Ortiz E, Daniels GH et al. Subclinical thyroid disease: scientific review and guidelines for diagnosis and management. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291(2):228–23.
4. Alexander CM, Landsman PB, Teutsch SM, et al: NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 years and older. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1210–1214.
5. Gonzalez Gil L, de la Sierra A. Prevalence of hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with subclinical hypothyroidism. Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Apr 21;148(8):351-353.
6. Kim J, Prasitlumkum N, Randhawa S, et al. Association between Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Incident Hypertension in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3318.
7. Cai P, Peng Y, Chen Y, et al. Blood pressure characteristics of subclinical hypothyroidism: an observation study combined with office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure. J Hypertens. 2021 Mar 1;39(3):453-460
8. Yamamoto K, Nakano Y, Soejima Y, et al. Is subclinical hypothyroidism associated with cardiovascular disease in the elderly? Endocr Connect. 2025 Apr 8;14(5):e240601
9. Manolis AA, Manolis TA, et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and cardiovascular consequences: An alarming wake-up call? Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Feb;30(2):57-69.
10. Treister-Goltzman Y, Yarza S, et al. Lipid profile in mild subclinical hypothyroidism: systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Endocrinol (Torino). 2021 Dec;46(4):428-440.
11. Chowdhury SR, Mandal TK, et al. A Study Correlating the Effects of Subclinical Hypothyroidism on the Known Modifiable Risk Factors of Coronary Artery Disease in Indian Adults. J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Dec;72(12):44-48
12. National Heart L, North American Association for the Study of Obesity. The Practical Guide Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. The Institute; 2000
13. Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Flanders WD et al. Serum TSH, T4, and Thyroid Antibodies in the United States Population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2002;87(2):489–499.
14. Fazaeli M, Khoshdel A, Shafiepour M, et al. The influence of subclinical hypothyroidism on serum lipid profile, PCSK9 levels and CD36 expression on monocytes. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Jan-Feb;13(1):312-316. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 23. PMID: 30641718.
15. Geng H, Zhang X, Wang C, et al. Even mildly elevated TSH is associated with an atherogenic lipid profile in postmenopausal women with subclinical hypothyroidism. Endocr Res. 2015;40(1):1-7.
16. Tarboush F, Alsultan M, Alourfi Z. The correlation of lipid profile with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism: A cross-sectional study from Syria. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e34959
17. Asranna A, Taneja RS, Kulshreshta B. Dyslipidemia in subclinical hypothyroidism and the effect of thyroxine on lipid profile. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Dec;16(Suppl 2):S347-9
18. Wang X, Zhang E, Tian Z, et al. The association between dyslipidaemia in the first trimester and adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism: a cohort study. Lipids Health Dis. 2024 Jan 11;23(1):13.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Comparative Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine versus Oral Midazolam for Preoperative Anxiolysis in Paediatric Patients: Cardiovascular and Sedation Outcomes
Dr. Nikhil Kumar Singh ,
...
Dr. Matendra Singh Yadav
Published: 18/12/2025

Download PDF