Background: Timely intervention in emergency surgeries is critical to reducing morbidity and mortality. However, various patient, disease, and hospital-level factors contribute to delays. Limited data are available from Indian tertiary care centers that quantify delays across defined intervals. Aim: To assess total waiting time and analyze contributing factors responsible for delays in emergency surgeries. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 60 days in the Department of Emergency medicine in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 100 patients requiring emergency surgery were included. Patients were evaluated from the time of emergency arrival to the surgical incision. Waiting time was divided into five intervals. Contributing factors were categorized as patient-related (e.g., consent delay, financial constraints), disease-related (e.g., diagnosis, pre-op investigations), and hospital-related (e.g., OT availability, staff, consultations). Results: Mean total waiting time was 737 minutes (12.3 hours). The most significant contributor to delay was operation theatre unavailability (61%), followed by interdepartmental consultations (26%) and preoperative interventions (25%). Patient-related delays included consent (6%), financial/logistic issues (14%), and blood arrangement (11%). General surgery accounted for 84% of cases; 48% underwent general anesthesia. Conclusion: Delays in emergency surgery are multifactorial, with hospital system issues being most prominent. Structural reforms such as dedicated emergency OTs, improved scheduling, and better coordination can significantly reduce waiting times and improve surgical outcomes.
Emergency surgical care is inherently time-sensitive; delays from Emergency Department arrival to surgical intervention are linked to increased morbidity and mortality. A study of 1,199 emergency general surgery (EGS) patients found that operations delayed for 6.7–10.7 hours after initial evaluation doubled mortality risk, with delays beyond 24 hours posing even greater risk. Literature indicates that each hour of delay—especially beyond 16 hours in conditions like gastrointestinal perforation—is associated with higher rates of ICU readmission and complications. Delays arise from factors at both system and patient levels, including operating room (OR) unavailability, staffing shortages, delayed consent, and required preoperative investigations. In low- and middle-income countries, logistical and infrastructural constraints in emergency surgery are particularly pronounced. However, there is a paucity of prospective data from Indian tertiary care centers that quantify each stage of delay. This study aims to evaluate total waiting time and identify contributing factors across defined intervals, to guide targeted interventions and improve emergency surgical outcomes.
Aim and Objectives: This study aims to assess the total waiting time for emergency surgeries and identify contributing factors by analyzing delays across defined intervals, categorized into patient, disease, and hospital-related causes.
A prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 60 days, from 1st March 2025 to 30th April 2025, in the Emergency Department of a tertiary care hospital. A total of 100 patients who presented with surgical emergencies and required operative intervention were enrolled in the study.
Inclusion criteria included all patients diagnosed with a surgical emergency and admitted through the Emergency Department during the study period. Exclusion criteria included:
· Emergency surgeries not routed through the Emergency Department.
· Canceled or postponed surgeries after shifting to the Operation Theatre (OT).
· Surgeries performed by departments other than General Surgery and Orthopedics, to avoid interdepartmental variation and bias.
Data were recorded using a structured data collection form designed after reviewing past emergency surgery records. When required, in-depth interviews were conducted with patients/relatives and healthcare providers for clarification and qualitative insights.
Definition of Waiting Time: The waiting time was defined as the duration from the time of patient arrival at the Emergency Department to the time of the first surgical incision. For detailed analysis, the waiting period was divided into five intervals:
1. Arrival at ED → First surgical consultation
2. Surgical consultation → Decision to operate
3. Decision to operate → Shift to OT
4. Arrival in OT → Anesthetic consultation
5. Anesthetic consultation → Surgical incision
Factors Analyzed and Data Analysis: Contributing factors to surgical delays were grouped into three domains: patient-related (age, gender, consent delay, logistics), disease-related (diagnosis, comorbidities, investigations, pre-op interventions), and hospital-related (OT availability, staff, interdepartmental consultations, emergency workload). Data were entered into SPSS version 26, validated, and analyzed to assess associations between delay intervals and contributing factors.
A prospective observational study was carried out over a 60-day period in the Emergency Department of a tertiary care hospital, enrolling 100 patients who required emergency surgical intervention. Each patient was assessed from the point of arrival in the emergency department to the initiation of surgical incision. The total waiting time was segmented into five defined intervals. Factors contributing to delays were systematically classified into three categories: patient-related (such as delayed consent and financial limitations), disease-related (including diagnosis and preoperative investigations), and hospital-related (such as operation theatre availability, staffing, and interdepartmental consultations).
Table 1: Demographic Profile of Patients
Parameter |
Value |
Total patients enrolled |
100 |
Age range |
5 to 82 years |
Mean age |
31.5 years |
Gender (Male) |
72% |
Gender (Female) |
28% |
Table 2: Department Distribution
Department |
Percentage (%) |
General Surgery |
84 |
Orthopedics |
16 |
Table 3: Interdepartmental Consultations
Department Consulted |
Percentage (%) |
Medicine |
10 |
Anesthesiology |
5 |
ENT |
3 |
Others |
8 |
Total Consultations |
26 |
Table 4: Types of Preoperative Anesthesia
Type of Anesthesia |
Percentage (%) |
General Anesthesia |
48 |
Spinal (SAB) |
38 |
Regional Block |
11 |
Local Anesthesia |
3 |
Mean Waiting Time for Each Interval
Interval |
Description |
Mean Time (Minutes) |
1 |
Arrival to surgical consultation |
160 |
2 |
Consultation to decision |
35 |
3 |
Decision to OT transfer |
450 |
4 |
Arrival at OT to anesthesia |
22 |
5 |
Anesthesia to incision |
70 |
Total |
Arrival to incision |
737 minutes (12 hrs 17 mins) |
Delays and Contributing Factors
Factor |
Percentage |
Pre-occupancy of OT |
61% |
Consultation delays |
26% |
Pre-op interventions |
25% |
Delay in consent |
6% |
Financial/logistic delay |
14% |
Blood arrangement |
11% |
Shortage of OT staff/supplies |
10% |
Our study confirms that delays in emergency surgical procedures are multifactorial, influenced by patient, disease, and system-level factors. The prolonged waiting time—mean total time of 737 minutes (≈12.3 hours)—is largely attributable to hospital-level issues, particularly operation theater (OT) unavailability (61%), mirroring earlier findings where pre-occupied OTs accounted for nearly 60% of delays.
Delays in emergency surgical intervention are unequivocally linked to poorer patient outcomes, encompassing higher morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and increased mortality. A retrospective study of patients demonstrated that operations delayed beyond 48 hours after hospital admission were associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality and major complications, compared with earlier surgeries. In their study Smith et al. found that urgent or emergency surgeries performed during nights or weekends carried a 27% higher risk of short-term mortality than those done on weekdays. Furthermore, even shorter delays before emergency abdominal surgery in low- and middle-income countries have been associated with significantly elevated perioperative mortality. Together, these findings underscore that each hour of delay in emergency surgery may carry measurable risks, reinforcing the critical need for system-level interventions that expedite operative care to improve outcomes.
System and organizational factors are the predominant contributors to delays in emergency surgery. In our study, 61% of delays were related to operation theatre unavailability, a trend echoed in Wyatt et al.'s UK district hospital study, where 47% of emergency cases faced theatre delays—often due to elective list overruns with after-midnight workloads dropping from 26% to 10% when afternoon OT and anesthetic availability were ensured. Further compounding this, the "weekend effect" has been identified as a consistent detriment: a meta-analysis showed a 27% higher odds of short-term mortality for weekend emergency surgeries compared to weekdays.6 Such findings underscore that inadequate staffing, restricted OT access, and insufficient coordination during off-hours significantly prolong waiting times and harm outcomes. Our results affirm the need for structural reforms like dedicated emergency theatres, bolstered after-hours teams, and improved scheduling to reduce systemic delays in emergency surgical care.
While hospital constraints are dominant, patient-related delays (e.g. consent delays [6%], arranging finances [14%], blood logistics [11%]) and disease-related requirements (e.g., consultations [26%], special investigations/interventions [25%]) accounted for approximately one-third of delays. Shikder et al.’s study in Bangladesh similarly found that financial/logistical hurdles comprised around 13–14% and pre-op interventions around 23–25% .
Though not directly measured in our cohort, international literature shows increased mortality associated with after-hours or weekend surgeries—the so-called "weekend effect". For certain emergency procedures, mortality risk increases by 11–37% compared to weekday operations. These underscore broader challenges in staffing and resource allocation outside regular hours.
Evidence supports that addressing system delays can positively impact outcomes. In one retrospective analysis, ensuring early operative interventions significantly reduced in-hospital mortality among EGS patients. Adoption of structured checklists—like the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has also offered nearly 40% reduction in 30-day mortality after emergency laparotomy in LMICs.
Delays in emergency surgical care remain a crucial and modifiable determinant of patient outcomes. While system-level constraints like OT availability are the major contributors, patient and disease-related factors also play meaningful roles. Addressing these delays through process optimization, resource allocation, and standardized protocols could significantly lower morbidity and mortality in emergency surgery settings.
1. Silver DS, Lu L, Beiriger J, Reitz KM, Khamzina Y, Neal MD, Peitzman AB, Brown JB. Association between timing of operative interventions and mortality in emergency general surgery. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jul 17;9(1):e001479. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001479. PMID: 39027653; PMCID: PMC11256066.
2. Lee J, Im C. Time-to-surgery paradigms: wait time and surgical outcomes in critically Ill patients who underwent emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforation. BMC Surg. 2024;24(1):159.
3. Tiwari Y, Goel S, Singh A. Arrival time pattern and waiting time distribution of patients in the emergency outpatient department of a tertiary level health care institution of North India. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014 Jul;7(3):160-5.
4. Coccolini F, Sartelli M, Sawyer R, Rasa K, Viaggi B, Abu-Zidan F, et al. Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):41.
5. Wandling MW, Ko CY, Bankey PE, Cribari C, Cryer HG, Diaz JJ, et al. Expanding the scope of quality measurement in surgery to include nonoperative care: Results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program emergency general surgery pilot. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):837-45.
6. Smith SA, Yamamoto JM, Roberts DJ, Tang KL, Ronksley PE, Dixon E, et al. Weekend Surgical Care and Postoperative Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):121-9.
7. Dirie NI, Elmi AH, Ahmed AM, Ahmed MM, Omar MA, Hassan MM, et al. Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in resource-limited Somalia: a new standard in surgical safety. Patient Saf Surg. 2024;18(1):30.
8. Wyatt MG, Houghton PW, Brodribb AJ. Theatre delay for emergency general surgical patients: a cause for concern? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990 Jul;72(4):236-8.
9. Shikder KU, Jahan A, Hossain S. Study of factors associated with waiting time for patients undergoing emergency surgery. Sch J App Med Sci, 2023 Aug 11(8): 1399-1404.
10. Jang KM, Jang JS. Weekend Admission and Mortality in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2023 Dec 12;19(4):422-33.
11. David S Silver, Liling Lu, Jamison Beiriger, Katherine M Reitz, Yekaterina Khamzina, Matthew D Neal, Andrew B Peitzman, Joshua B Brown - Association between timing of operative interventions and mortality in emergency general surgery: Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open 2024;9:e001479.
12. Papaconstantinou HT, Jo C, Reznik SI, Smythe WR, Wehbe-Janek H. Implementation of a surgical safety checklist: impact on surgical team perspectives. Ochsner J. 2013 Fall;13(3):299-309.