Background: The ketogenic diet (KD), a dietary regimen characterized by a pronounced shift in macronutrient composition—high fat (typically 70-80% of total calories), moderate protein (15-20%), and very low carbohydrate (often <50g or 5-10% of calories)—has transcended its origins as a therapeutic intervention for refractory epilepsy. It now garners significant scientific and public interest for its potential benefits across a spectrum of clinical conditions. Substantial evidence supports its efficacy in managing metabolic disorders, including obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, primarily through mechanisms like enhanced satiety, reduced insulin resistance, and improved lipid profiles. Materials and Methods This is a Case-control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology at Index Medical College. Data was collected from consenting participants attending the outpatient departments (OPD) of General Medicine and Physiology at Index Medical College and hospital from January 2023 to December 2024. Participants were recruited after meeting inclusion criteria and providing informed consent. Using non-invasive techniques such as ultrasonographic assessment of gastric emptying and/or scintigraphy where feasible. Including measurement of gastric acid output, stool fat content, and bowel transit time. Including serum cytokines (IL-6, TNF-alpha), CRP levels, and fecal calprotectin. Results After 8 weeks, the KD group demonstrated a significant improvement in gastric motility compared with controls. Gastric emptying time (GE T½) decreased significantly in the KD group (115.3 ± 14.5 to 104.2 ± 13.8 min; p < 0.001), whereas the control group showed minimal change (114.8 ± 15.2 to 113.0 ± 14.9 min). Similarly, scintigraphy retention percentage was reduced in the KD group (62.4 ± 6.8% to 55.1 ± 6.5%), with little change in controls (62.1 ± 7.0% to 61.0 ± 6.9%) (p < 0.001). The KD group exhibited significant alterations in gastric function after 8 weeks. Gastric acid output increased from 14.1 ± 2.3 to 15.2 ± 2.4 mmol/hr, compared to a negligible rise in controls (14.0 ± 2.2 to 14.1 ± 2.3; p = 0.002). Stool fat content markedly increased in the KD group (4.2 ± 1.1 to 8.9 ± 2.0 g/day), reflecting the high-fat nature of the diet, whereas the control group showed no significant change (p < 0.001). Additionally, bowel transit time increased modestly in the KD group (36.5 ± 6.4 to 39.8 ± 6.6 hrs) compared to controls (36.2 ± 6.6 to 36.5 ± 6.7 hrs; p = 0.001) Conclusion This study provides novel evidence that an 8-week KD in healthy Indian adults accelerates gastric emptying, increases gastric acid secretion, alters distal gut transit, reduces systemic and intestinal inflammation, and reshapes the gut microbiota. These changes are directionally consistent with several prior KD studies but offer new insights into gastrointestinal physiology in a non-Western dietary context.
The ketogenic diet (KD), a dietary regimen characterized by a pronounced shift in macronutrient composition—high fat (typically 70-80% of total calories), moderate protein (15-20%), and very low carbohydrate (often <50g or 5-10% of calories)—has transcended its origins as a therapeutic intervention for refractory epilepsy. [1-3] It now garners significant scientific and public interest for its potential benefits across a spectrum of clinical conditions. Substantial evidence supports its efficacy in managing metabolic disorders, including obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, primarily through mechanisms like enhanced satiety, reduced insulin resistance, and improved lipid profiles. [4]
Concurrently, the gastrointestinal (GI) tract has been recognized not merely as an organ of digestion and absorption, but as a critical nexus for overall health, intimately linking nutrition, immunity, the microbiome, and systemic inflammation. [5-8] The gut harbors the densest concentration of immune cells in the body (Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue, GALT) and hosts a vast, complex ecosystem of trillions of microbes (the gut microbiota), both exquisitely sensitive to dietary composition and patterns. [9] Dietary components directly influence gut barrier integrity, modulate immune cell function, and shape the microbiota's structure and metabolic output. Consequently, dietary interventions like the KD possess significant potential to impact fundamental gastric and intestinal functions. However, while a robust body of literature details KD's effects on weight loss, glycemic control, and neurological outcomes, research specifically investigating its influence on gastric physiology—particularly motility—and local/systemic immunological parameters in human subjects remains surprisingly limited. [10] This gap is even more pronounced concerning diverse populations like those in India.
Dietary fats are potent inhibitors of gastric emptying via the "ileal brake" mechanism and hormonal responses (e.g., CCK release). [11-13] Could chronic high fat intake alter gastric emptying rates, accommodation (relaxation to receive food), or overall motility patterns? Furthermore, ketone bodies themselves may have direct or indirect effects on gastric acid secretion or the release of key gut hormones regulating motility and appetite. [14] Understanding these potential alterations is crucial for assessing the diet's tolerability and potential side effects (like nausea or dyspepsia) and its broader digestive implications.
Despite the established efficacy of the ketogenic diet in several clinical domains, its specific implications for gastric physiology (motility and function) and immunity, particularly within the unique genetic, dietary, and environmental context of the Indian population, remain a significant knowledge gap. This study is designed to address this gap, contributing crucial evidence to the fields of nutritional science, gastroenterology, immunology, and personalized medicine, ultimately guiding safer and more effective dietary interventions.
This is a Case-control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology at Index Medical College. Data was collected from consenting participants attending the outpatient departments (OPD) of General Medicine and Physiology at Index Medical College and hospital from January 2023 to December 2024. Participants were recruited after meeting inclusion criteria and providing informed consent.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Sample Size Calculation
Methodology
Participants will be divided into two groups:
Both groups will undergo baseline and post-intervention (8-week) evaluations for:
Dietary Adherence Monitoring:
Weekly dietary logs and ketone monitoring (urine or blood strips) will ensure compliance in the KD group. The control group will maintain food diaries.
Statistical Analysis
Data will be entered into SPSS (v28). Continuous variables will be expressed as mean ± SD; categorical data will be presented as frequencies. Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Pearson or Spearman correlation tests between diet adherence and outcomes. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Variable |
KD Group (n=132) |
Control Group (n=132) |
p-value |
Age (years, mean ± SD) |
34.6 ± 7.8 |
34.1 ± 8.0 |
0.62 |
Sex (M/F) |
68/64 |
70/62 |
0.78 |
BMI (kg/m², mean ± SD) |
25.1 ± 2.8 |
25.0 ± 2.9 |
0.85 |
Baseline gastric motility (GE T½, min) |
115.3 ± 14.5 |
114.8 ± 15.2 |
0.79 |
Baseline gastric acid output (mmol/hr) |
14.1 ± 2.3 |
14.0 ± 2.2 |
0.88 |
Baseline stool fat content (g/day) |
4.2 ± 1.1 |
4.1 ± 1.0 |
0.63 |
Baseline bowel transit time (hrs) |
36.5 ± 6.4 |
36.2 ± 6.6 |
0.72 |
Baseline CRP (mg/L) |
2.9 ± 1.1 |
2.8 ± 1.0 |
0.58 |
Baseline IL-6 (pg/mL) |
3.7 ± 1.4 |
3.6 ± 1.5 |
0.74 |
Baseline TNF-α (pg/mL) |
12.8 ± 2.9 |
12.6 ± 3.0 |
0.69 |
Parameter |
KD Group (Baseline) |
KD Group (8 weeks) |
Control Group (Baseline) |
Control Group (8 weeks) |
p-value (intergroup) |
Gastric emptying time (GE T½, min) |
115.3 ± 14.5 |
104.2 ± 13.8 |
114.8 ± 15.2 |
113.0 ± 14.9 |
<0.001 |
Scintigraphy retention (%) |
62.4 ± 6.8 |
55.1 ± 6.5 |
62.1 ± 7.0 |
61.0 ± 6.9 |
<0.001 |
Parameter |
KD Group (Baseline) |
KD Group (8 weeks) |
Control Group (Baseline) |
Control Group (8 weeks) |
p-value |
Gastric acid output (mmol/hr) |
14.1 ± 2.3 |
15.2 ± 2.4 |
14.0 ± 2.2 |
14.1 ± 2.3 |
0.002 |
Stool fat content (g/day) |
4.2 ± 1.1 |
8.9 ± 2.0 |
4.1 ± 1.0 |
4.3 ± 1.1 |
<0.001 |
Bowel transit time (hrs) |
36.5 ± 6.4 |
39.8 ± 6.6 |
36.2 ± 6.6 |
36.5 ± 6.7 |
0.001 |
Variable |
KD Group (r, p-value) |
Control Group (r, p-value) |
Adherence vs Gastric emptying time change |
-0.42, <0.001 |
-0.08, 0.35 |
Adherence vs CRP change |
-0.38, <0.001 |
-0.05, 0.55 |
Adherence vs Alpha diversity change |
-0.31, 0.001 |
0.02, 0.82 |
Outcome |
Mean Change KD Group ± SD |
Mean Change Control Group ± SD |
p-value |
Effect Size (Cohen’s d) |
Gastric emptying time (min) |
-11.1 ± 6.2 |
-1.8 ± 5.9 |
<0.001 |
1.58 |
Gastric acid output (mmol/hr) |
+1.1 ± 1.0 |
+0.1 ± 0.9 |
0.002 |
1.04 |
CRP (mg/L) |
-0.8 ± 0.6 |
-0.1 ± 0.5 |
<0.001 |
1.27 |
IL-6 (pg/mL) |
-0.9 ± 0.8 |
-0.1 ± 0.7 |
<0.001 |
1.09 |
Alpha diversity index |
-0.33 ± 0.18 |
-0.01 ± 0.17 |
<0.001 |
1.78 |
Our study observed a mean reduction in gastric emptying half-time (T½) of approximately 11 minutes in the KD group compared with only ~2 minutes in controls. This acceleration was corroborated by scintigraphy retention data, which also showed significant improvement in the KD group. These results are consistent with the findings of O’Keeffe et al. (2018), who reported faster gastric emptying in obese individuals following low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets, potentially due to altered cholecystokinin (CCK) and peptide YY (PYY) signaling. [15-18] Similarly, Ma et al. (2015) observed that carbohydrate restriction modulates gastric motor function, likely via changes in postprandial glycemia and insulin levels, which in turn influence vagal and enteric nervous system activity. [19]
The observed motility changes could also be linked to increased dietary fat content in KD, which stimulates gastric phase secretion of hormones such as motilin and modulates gastric compliance. However, the mechanism is not fully understood, and some prior studies (e.g., Pilichiewicz et al., 2007) have reported fat-induced slowing of gastric emptying; the discrepancy may relate to the chronic adaptation phase in KD, during which shifts in ketone metabolism and gut hormone profiles may override the initial lipid-mediated slowing. [20]
KD participants showed a modest but statistically significant increase in gastric acid output (+1.1 mmol/hr). While hypersecretion was not observed, this change aligns with early reports by Stewart & Barclay (1975), who noted increased basal acid secretion in high-fat diet regimens. [21] One explanation may involve increased gastrin release secondary to higher protein and fat intake, as amino acids and fatty acids can directly stimulate antral G cells. [22] Another possible mechanism is augmented vagal stimulation due to the caloric density and sensory characteristics of KD meals. [23]
The marked rise in stool fat content in KD participants reflects the high lipid load and incomplete absorption, a finding echoed in the work of Fine & Lee (1992) on fat malabsorption during ketogenic regimens. [24] This effect may not be clinically problematic in the short term for healthy individuals but is relevant in the context of gastrointestinal disorders or pancreatic insufficiency.
Interestingly, bowel transit time was prolonged by about 3 hours in the KD group, despite accelerated gastric emptying. This phenomenon—faster proximal but slower distal transit—has been described in animal models (Tappenden et al., 2003) and may be linked to reduced fiber intake, altered bile acid pools, and microbiota changes influencing colonic motility. [25]
This study provides novel evidence that an 8-week KD in healthy Indian adults accelerates gastric emptying, increases gastric acid secretion, alters distal gut transit, reduces systemic and intestinal inflammation, and reshapes the gut microbiota. These changes are directionally consistent with several prior KD studies but offer new insights into gastrointestinal physiology in a non-Western dietary context. While the anti-inflammatory and motility effects may hold clinical promise, caution is warranted regarding microbiota diversity and distal transit changes. Personalization and careful monitoring should guide KD implementation for gastrointestinal and immunological health optimization.