European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Medical education is evolving from traditional didactic teaching to technology-enhanced, learner-centered approaches. The shift is driven by the adoption of Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) and advances in educational technology [1]. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Virtual Reality (VR) are among the most promising tools, supporting adaptive learning, immersive simulations, and real-time feedback mechanisms [2,3].

AI uses algorithms to replicate human reasoning, enabling systems to support decision-making, personalize content, and analyze learning outcomes [4]. VR allows students to experience immersive, interactive environments for anatomy visualization, surgical procedures, and clinical scenarios [5,6]. MEUs are at the forefront of this transition, ensuring that new technologies are pedagogically sound and contextually relevant.

Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Medical Education

1. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS)

AI-powered ITS platforms adapt content based on student performance. These systems provide personalized feedback, identify knowledge gaps, and simulate patient interactions. Tools like IBM Watson Tutor and Osmosis AI-based question banks have demonstrated improved academic performance [7,8]. They have shown very good acceptability by students.

2. Adaptive Learning Platforms

AI curates individualized learning pathways. Platforms like “Smart Sparrow” and “Coursera Labs” adjust difficulty levels dynamically, enabling students to master concepts at their own pace [9]. Students with differet metal abilities can be easily screeed with these tools.

3. AI in Assessment and Evaluation

AI is used for automating grading in MCQs, essays, and OSCE checklists. Natural language processing enables AI systems to assess short answers or clinical reasoning [10,11]. Machine learning can predict student outcomes based on attendance, assessments, and engagement data [12]. This also helps in reducing the work burdeon o medical teachers who are already overburdoed with clinical work.

4. Predictive Analytics

AI helps identify students at risk of academic failure or burnout by analyzing attendance, performance trends, and behavioral data [13]. Such early interventions improve retention and mental health. Referral to Student Guidace Unit (SGU) becomes easier with the help of AI.

5. AI Chatbots in Teaching

AI-driven chatbots can simulate patient interviews or clarify basic concepts on demand. These can serve as always-available virtual tutors [14].

Benefits of AI in Medical Education

AI allows personalized learning trajectories for studets with different mental abilities [15]. Scalable feedback mechanisms are geerated with ease and time is saved. AI also enhance cognitive engagement among students. Formative and summative assessments is improved with Artificial intelligence. [16]

Challenges of AI Implementation

Though the world is speaking about too many advantages of AI, it still has many challenges. Data privacy and ethical use of student data is of utmost concern. [17] AI has high development costs. There is need for faculty training and digital literacy when AI is incorporated.  [18] At present there is limited long-term outcome data to prove it's worthiness.

Virtual Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education

1. Types of VR Used

• Fully Immersive VR: Devices like Oculus Rift are used for procedural simulation (e.g., laparoscopy training) [19]
• Augmented Reality (AR): Tools like Microsoft HoloLens overlay digital information on the real environment for anatomy or pathology teaching [20]
• 360-Degree Videos: Used for clinical ward tours or demonstration of rare clinical cases [21]

2. VR in Anatomy Teaching

Dissecting cadavers is resource-intensive. VR-based tools like “Complete Anatomy” and “BioDigital Human” offer detailed, interactive 3D models [22]. Studies show enhanced spatial understanding and better retention [23].

3. VR for Procedural Training

VR is extensively used to train for surgery, CPR, endoscopy, and catheter insertion. It allows repetitive practice without risk to patients [24,25].

4. VR for Communication and Empathy Skills

Simulation-based VR scenarios help students experience patient perspectives, such as being in the shoes of a dementia patient or someone with schizophrenia [26].

Advantages of VR

VR provides immersive an safe environment for learning. [27] I promotes active and experiential learning. Skill acquisition is accelerated with use of VR. [28] It provides standardized learning experiences.

Limitations of VR

The obvious disadvantage of VR is high initial setup costs. [29] It requires technological infrastructure and support. Rarely it may cause motion sickness or eye strain in some learners [30]

Role of Medical Education Units (MEUs)

MEUs act as catalysts for integrating technology into  medical education.

1. Curricular Design and Implementation

MEUs help align AI and VR tools with CBME milestones and core competencies. They support the development of hybrid modules combining traditional teaching with simulation and AI-enhanced platforms [31].

2. Faculty Development

MEUs conduct workshops on instructional design, simulation pedagogy, and digital tools. Faculty resistance is reduced through hands-on training and demonstration of efficacy [32].

3. Quality Assurance and Evaluation

MEUs are responsible for evaluating the pedagogical soundness of new tools. They develop rubrics, collect student feedback, and assess outcome measures like skill performance and knowledge gain [33].

4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration

MEUs act as a bridge between clinicians, computer scientists, and instructional designers to co-create educational content that is technologically robust and medically accurate [34].

Recent Studies and Evidence

StudyTechnology UsedFindings

Sharma & Reddy, 2022 [35]AI tutor in pathologyImproved diagnostic accuracyLee et al., 2024 [36]AR in clinical scenariosEnhanced student engagementKim et al., 2021 [37]VR for empathy trainingImproved empathy scores in studentsBasheer et al., 2020 [38]VR vs cadaver dissectionVR group had better anatomical spatial orientationArora et al., 2023 [39]AI in formative assessmentsHigh accuracy in predicting final scores

Challenges in Integration

• Infrastructure Gap: Many institutions, especially in low-income regions, lack the funds for VR labs or AI systems.
• Faculty Skepticism: Older faculty may resist unfamiliar digital methods.
• Standardization: Lack of consensus on how to assess and accredit technology-based learning.
• Regulatory and Ethical Concerns: Especially relevant in AI-generated assessments and simulations involving patient data.

Future Directions

• Blended AI-VR Modules: Integrating VR scenarios with AI-based feedback for holistic learning is best and will have greater acceptance by students and teachers.
• Gamification and Serious Games: Making learning more interactive and engaging rather than traditional classroom teaching is more effective[40].
• National and International Consortia: Collaborative resource sharing between medical schools and technology sharing will enhance learning.
• Longitudinal Research: Studying long-term effects of AI/VR on clinical competence is yet to be studied on a larger scale and longer time horizon to prove it's efficacy.
• Student Involvement in Co-design: Empowering students to co-create content based on their needs will develop more interest in them and will boost their participation.

The integration of AI and VR into undergraduate medical education is no longer a futuristic concept but a practical reality. These technologies offer transformative benefits-adaptive learning, immersive practice, and scalable assessment. The MEU’s role is pivotal in aligning innovation with pedagogy, ensuring that implementation is context-sensitive, evidence-based, and sustainable. With continued investment in infrastructure, faculty training, and educational research, AI and VR can become cornerstone tools in building a future-ready medical curriculum.

1. Frank JR et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-645.
2. Ellaway RH, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455-473.
3. Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: a critical literature review. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):303-311.
4. Wartman SA, Combs CD. Medical education and the age of AI. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1107-1109.
5. Nilsson PM. Virtual reality in medical education. Med Educ. 2021;55(4):381–389.
6. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(suppl 1):i2–i10.
7. Ibrahim M, et al. AI in basic sciences teaching. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(2):523–529.
8. Branzetti JB et al. Use of AI in feedback and assessment. Acad Med. 2022;97(1):12–19.
9. Durning SJ, et al. Adaptive learning in medical education. Med Teach. 2016;38(6):537–543.
10. Berman NB et al. The role of AI in assessments. Acad Med. 2016;91(9):1217–1222.
11. Kononowicz AA et al. Virtual patients: an international review. Med Teach. 2015;37(9):759–764.
12. Chen J et al. Predictive analytics in education. Healthc Educ. 2020;35(3):145–150.
13. Ng S et al. Early detection of burnout using AI. Med Educ Online. 2022;27(1):2010887.
14. Wiljer D, et al. Chatbots in health professions education. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e22617.
15. Cook DA et al. Effectiveness of AI tools in health professions. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181-1196.
16. Sandars J, Patel R, et al. E-learning evaluation. Med Teach. 2014;36(5):471-477.
17. Al-Emran M, et al. Ethical implications of AI in education.
18. Comput Educ. 2020;160:104095.
19. Huwendiek S, et al. Barriers to tech adoption. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):e254-e263.
20. Taveira-Gomes A et al. Learning anatomy with VR. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(1):41–51.
21. Moro C et al. Augmented reality in education. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–559.
22. Lu J, et al. 360-degree videos in clinical education. Med Educ Online. 2021;26(1):1878857.
23. Tam MD, et al. Impact of VR on learning anatomy. Med Teach. 2010;32(6):e271–e275.
24. Shaikh S, et al. VR vs cadaveric teaching. J Anat. 2020;236(1):142–148.
25. Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based teaching. J Fam Community Med. 2010;17(1):35–40.
26. Aggarwal R et al. VR simulation for surgical training. BMJ. 2010;341:c5414.
27. Kim H, et al. VR empathy training. Acad Psychiatry. 2021;45(1):10–16.
28. Maresky HS, et al. Virtual reality in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(6):538–545.
29. Safi F, et al. Efficiency of VR training. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(3):1282–1289.
30. Nicholas D, et al. Cost analysis of VR in education. J Med Syst. 2019;43(7):210.
31. Kalantari S. Physiological responses to VR. Virtual Real. 2017;21(1):19–32.
32. Harden RM. Curriculum mapping and integration. Med Teach. 2001;23(2):123–137.
33. Issenberg SB, et al. Faculty training in simulation. Med Teach. 2011;33(9):e553–e566.
34. Topps D, et al. Evaluation frameworks for ed-tech. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:2382120520967191.
35. Wong RY, et al. Interdisciplinary tech teams. Med Educ. 2021;55(5):569–576.
36. Sharma D, Reddy P. AI tutor for diagnostics. Int J Med Educ. 2022;13:233–240.
37. Lee MJ, et al. AR in clinical training. Med Sci Educ. 2024;34(1):45–52.
38. Kim K, et al. VR for empathy. Med Educ. 2021;55(2):178–186.
39. Bsheer S, et al. VR vs dissection. Indian J Anat. 2020;9(1):25–30.
40. Arora M, et al. Predictive AI in exams. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):212–218.
41. McCoy L, et al. Serious games in medical ed. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016;3:JMECD.S31585.