Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
25 Views
6 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 3 (March, 2025) | Pages 81 - 89
Knowledge and Attitude Associated with Diabetic Foot Prevention among Primary Care Givers Attending Tertiary Care Hospital in Rural Karnataka: A Cross-Sectional Study.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education & Research, DSU,
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education & Research, DSU,
3
Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Navodaya Medical College Hospital & Research Centre,
4
4th year MBBS Student, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education & Research, DSU.
5
Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dr. Chandramma Dayannanda Sagar Institute of Medical Education & Research, DSU.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 1, 2025
Revised
Feb. 15, 2025
Accepted
Feb. 25, 2028
Published
March 5, 2025
Abstract

Background: The burden of diabetes, particularly diabetic foot complications, is a growing concern globally. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude towards diabetic foot care among primary caregivers of diabetic patients. A mixed-method approach, combining a cross-sectional survey and qualitative analysis, was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India. The study included 403 participants, majority being females and married and belonging to the age group of 28-37years with high school education. Results revealed that participants displayed good knowledge and positive attitudes towards diabetic foot care. Significant associations were found between age groups, gender, marital status, education levels, and religious affiliations with knowledge levels. Education emerged as a key factor influencing awareness of diabetic foot complications and preventive measures. These findings underscore the importance of tailored education and interventions for promoting diabetic foot care awareness among primary caregivers.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is a chronic condition characterized by elevated blood glucose levels due to either inadequate insulin production or the body's resistance to insulin, with type 2 diabetes being the most prevalent, particularly in adults1. In 2019, there were about 77 million cases in India, and this number is expected to reach 135 million by 20451.

 

Diabetes is associated with various complications, including damage to the heart, kidneys, and nerves, but one of the most severe and common complications is diabetic foot2. Diabetic foot, resulting from poor circulation, neuropathy, and infection, can lead to foot ulcers, which affect around 25% of diabetic patients, with 85% of lower-limb amputations being preventable if detected early. Each year, about 45,000 lower limb amputations occur in India due to diabetic foot3. Prevention strategies such as early identification and timely interventions are critical in reducing morbidity and improving patients' quality of life4.

 

In rural and developing areas, where access to healthcare is limited, educating family members and primary caregivers on diabetic foot prevention and care becomes all the more vital.

 

Aims and Objectives

  1. To estimate the knowledge level and attitude about diabetic foot among primary care givers of diabetic patients.
  2. To determine the association of knowledge and attitude about diabetic foot with socio-demographic factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study type: A mixed method research of combined cross-sectional survey and qualitative research.

 

Study setting: Out patients department and in- patients wards of Medicine & surgery departments, in the selected tertiary care hospital.

 

Study population: Primary care givers accompanying diabetes patients in the selected tertiary care hospital.

 

Study duration: Five months. August 2023 to December 2023.

 

Sampling Procedure: Simple random sampling, using lottery method (Quantitative data)

 

Inclusion criteria: Participants aged 18 years and above, involved in diabetes patient care of family member and willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Known case of diabetes mellitus.

 

Sample size: The sample size was estimated using n = (N) (Zα/2)2 / (Zα/2)2 + (4) (N) (e) 2 formula, when population size is known i.e., total population of the selected district from the census 2011(7) is 1082636. Where (Zα/2) = 1.96 at 95% Confidence interval, N = population size =1082636, e= 0.05.  We got the sample size as 384 and considering non response rate as 5% = 19. Sample size was calculated to be 384+19 = 403

 

Method of data collection

The study participants were interviewed individually using a pre-designed and semi-structured questionnaire. After obtaining written informed consent signed by the participant, the purpose of the study was explained to them. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a cross-sectional survey with qualitative research. A survey was conducted using a questionnaire and focus group discussions with primary caregivers of diabetic foot patients to explore their perspectives on diabetes, its complications (such as diabetic foot), and prevention strategies. The questionnaire was divided into three sections. The first section focused on the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants, including age, gender, educational background, occupation, socio-economic status, religion, and their relationship to the diabetic patient.

 

The second section focussed on assessing their knowledge about risk factors of diabetic foot, foot examinations and treatment. Scoring was assigned using a two-point scale: Zero for incorrect or "don't know" responses, and one for correct answers. The third section focused on participant’s attitude towards diabetic foot and its prevention, with questions addressing perceived susceptibility to diabetic foot, prevention strategies, and the importance of such measures. Scoring was given using a five-point Likert scale: One = strongly disagree, Two = disagree, Three = neutral, Four = agree, Five = strongly agree.

 

The number of participants were six to eight. The focus group discussion was carried out until thematic saturation was reached. A focus group discussion was conducted in the outpatient departments of selected tertiary care hospitals. The discussion centred on participants' awareness and attitudes towards diabetic foot complications, including its causes, risk factors, importance of foot examinations, available diagnostic investigations, and the recommended frequency of these exams. Additionally, the discussion addressed treatment adherence, common medication side effects, home care practices, the harmful effects of smoking and alcohol, and the significance of maintaining a diabetic diet and regular physical activity. The discussion was recorded using a digital voice recorder, and notes were taken. The recorded information was transcribed and translated into English.

 

Statistical Analysis:

Data was entered in MS Office Excel 2007 and after coding it was further processed and analysed using Open Epi info statistical software version 7.0. Data was expressed as percentages and proportions for qualitative data and mean and standard deviations for quantitative data. Chi square test was used for assessing the association among the study variables. A “p” value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Table 1: Socio-demographic factors of the study participants

Sociodemographic Factors

Number of Subjects (%)

Age (Years)

 

18-27

86 (21.3)

28-37

122 (30.3)

38-47

64 (15.9)

48-57

70 (17.4)

58-67

37 (9.2)

68-77

20 (5)

78+

4 (1)

Gender

 

Male

168 (41.6)

Female

235 (58.3)

Marital Status

 

Married

298 (73.9)

Unmarried

77 (19.1)

Widow

21 (5.2)

Divorced

7 (1.7)

Educational Status

 

Illiterate

96 (23.8)

Primary School

39 (9.7)

Middle School

55 (13.6)

High School

96 (23.8)

Graduate/Post Graduate

95 (23.6)

Professional

22 (5.5)

Religion

 

Hindu

298 (73.9)

Muslim

59 (14.6)

Christian

42 (10.4)

Others

4 (1)

Type of Family

 

Joint

188 (46.7)

Nuclear

215 (53.3)

Socioeconomic Status

 

Class 1

10 (2.5)

Class 2

126 (31.3)

Class 3

168 (41.7)

Class 4

84 (20.8)

Class 5

15 (3.7)

In our study, participants' ages ranged from 18 to over 78 years. The largest group, 122 participants (30.3%), was aged between 28 and 37 years, and the majority, 235 participants (58.3%), were females. Most participants, 298 (73.9%), were married. In terms of education, a significant proportion were illiterate (96 participants, 23.8%), while another 96 (23.8%) had completed up to high school. A majority, 141 participants (35%), were housewives. Regarding socio-economic status, most participants (168, or 41.7%) belonged to Class III.

 

Table 2a: Information regarding Knowledge of primary care givers about Diabetic foot

How often do diabetic patients needs to check their footwear for tears and other objects:

No OF SUBJECTS (%)

Never

27 (6.7)

Sometimes

188 (46.7)

Regular

188 (46.7)

What temperature of water should they need to use to wash their feet:

 

Hot

20 (5)

Cold

13 (3.2)

Warm

75 (18.6)

Normal

169 (41.9)

Don’t Know

126 (31.3)

Type of socks to be worn by diabetic patients

 

Woollen

157 (39)

Don’t know

246 (61)

How often diabetic patients needs to wash their feet

 

Twice a day or more

94 (23.3)

Once a day

137 (34)

Not often

82 (20.3)

Don’t know

90 (22.3)

 

The study revealed that, out of 403 participants, 188(46.7%) rightly answered that diabetic patients needs to check their footwear for tears and other objects regularly. Most participants, 169 (41.9%), indicated that normal temperature water should be used to wash the feet, while 75 (18.6%) correctly stated that lukewarm water is preferred. Only 157 (39%) participants correctly identified that diabetic patients should wear woollen socks. When asked about foot care frequency, the majority, 137 (34%), answered that diabetic patients should wash their feet once a day, followed by 94 (23.3%) who suggested twice a day or more.

 

Information regarding Knowledge of primary care givers about Diabetic foot revealed that majority had good knowledge about the factors such as diabetics will have reduced blood in their feet (53.8%), diabetics are likely to develop reduced sensation in their feet (60.5%), delayed wound healing among diabetics (59.8%), reduced sensation in feet due to minor injuries (54.8%), treatment adherence will reduce complications (87.3%), regular exercising can prevent diabetic foot (59.3%) & first noticeable signs are burning sensation , tingling & pain (53.1%) while majority (50.1%) were not aware about the prevention of diabetic foot with the use of talcum powder in  keeping the interdigital spaces dry.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2b: Information regarding Knowledge of primary care givers about Diabetic foot

Questions

Yes (%)

No (%)

Don’t know (%)

Total

Diabetics are likely to develop reduced blood flow in their feet

217 (53.8)

36 (8.9)

150 (37.2)

403

Diabetics are likely to develop reduced sensation in their feet

244 (60.5)

28 (6.9)

131(32.5)

403

Diabetics should look after their feet as they can’t feel minor injuries

221 (54.8)

46 (11.4)

136 (33.7)

403

 

It is important to examine the inside of footwear for any object or tear

188 (46.7)

40 (9.9)

175 (43.4)

403

 

Diabetic patients’ wounds don’t heal quickly

241 (59.8)

28 (6.9)

134 (33.3)

403

 

They shouldn’t smoke as poor circulation affects their feet

191 (47.4)

45 (11.2)

167 (41.4)

403

 

Foot gangrene is one of the diabetic foot complications

191 (47.4)

31 (7.7)

181 (44.9)

403

 

Taking medication regularly will reduce DM complication

352 (87.3)

18 (4.5)

33 (8.2)

403

 

Do you think doing regular exercise will help to prevent diabetic foot?

239 (59.3)

31 (7.7)

133 (33)

403

 

Uncontrolled diabetes can lead to foot deformity?

163 (40.4)

39 (9.7)

201 (49.9)

403

Burning sensation, tingling, and pain is the first signs of diabetic foot.

214 (53.1)

22 (5.5)

167 (41.4)

403

Walking barefoot outside the house is a risk factor for diabetic foot.

200 (49.6)

65 (16.1)

138 (34.2)

403

 

Smoking increases the chances of getting diabetic foot.

195 (48.4)

33 (8.2)

175 (43.4)

403

 

Use of talcum powder to keep inter digital spaces dry helps in prevention of diabetic foot

152 (37.7)

49 (12.2)

202 (50.1)

403

 

 

Table 3: Information regarding Attitude of primary care givers about Diabetic foot

Questions

Strongly disagree (1)

Disagree (2)

Neutral (3)

Agree (4)

Strongly agree (5)

Total

I find diabetic foot care as a burden.

96 (23.8%)

86 (21.3%)

148 (36.7%)

41 (10.2%)

32 (7.9%)

403 (100%)

I’m not confident about taking care of diabetic patients.

69 (17.1%)

91 (22.6%)

110 (27.3%)

40 (9.9%)

93 (23.1%)

403 (100%)

I don’t have the time to frequently check my relative’s foot for early signs.

54 (13.4%)

107 (26.6%)

107 (26.6%)

116 (28.8%)

19 (4.7%)

403 (100%)

I don’t think it’s necessary to assess diabetic ulcers frequently.

84 (20.8%)

106 (26.3%)

170 (42.2%)

31 (7.7%)

12 (3%)

403 (100%)

Taking the patients on regular check-ups is not need.

125 (31%)

97 (24.1%)

156 (38.7%)

17 (4.2%)

8 (2%)

403 (100%)

Sedentary lifestyle contributes to diabetic foot.

17 (4.2)

68 (16.9%)

210 (52.1%)

64 (15.9%)

44 (10.9%)

403 (100%)

 

 

Table 4: Association of Knowledge score of study participants with socio demographic details

Socio Demography

Knowledge Score

Total

Chi Square

P Value

Positive

 

Negative

n

%

n

%

n

%

Age

<18

15

88.2%

2

11.8%

17

100

 

 

 

 

 

66.012

 

 

 

 

 

0.000

18-27

60

84.5%

11

15.5%

71

28-37

52

88.6%

69

11.4%

121

38-47

53

84.1%

10

15.9%

63

48-57

52

74.3%

18

25.7%

70

58-67

17

45.9%

20

54.1%

37

68-77

9

45.0%

11

55.0%

20

78+

1

25.0%

3

75.0%

4

Gender

Female

131

55.8%

104

44.2%

235

100

 

18.08

 

0.000

Male

127

76.1%

40

23.9%

167

Educational

Status

 

 

Illiterate

17

17.5%

80

82.5%

97

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

158.218

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.000

Primary School

20

51.3%

19

48.7%

39

Middle School

33

61.1%

21

38.9%

54

High School

75

79.0%

20

21.0%

95

Diploma

33

97.1%

1

2.9%

34

Graduate/Post Grad

59

95.2%

3

4.8%

62

Professional

22

100.0%

0

0.0%

22

Religion

Hindu

170

57.1%

128

42.9%

298

100

 

 

 

30.234

 

 

 

0.000

Muslim

45

76.3%

14

23.7%

59

Christian

40

95.2%

2

4.8%

42

Others

4

100.0%

0

0.0%

4

Type of Family

Joint

144

77.0%

43

23.0%

187

100

 

24.649

 

0.000

Nuclear

115

53.1%

101

46.9%

216

Socioeconomic Status

Class 1

10

100.0%

0

0.0%

10

100

 

 

67.964

 

 

0.000

Class 2

53

41.9%

73

58.1%

126

Class 3

141

50.0%

141

50.0%

168

Class 4

50

50.0%

50

50.0%

84

Class 5

10

66.7%

5

33.3%

15

Marital Status

Divorced

6

1.48%

1

0.24%

7

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

30.815

 

 

 

 

0.000

Married

169

41.93%

129

32%

298

Unmarried

69

17.12%

8

1.98%

77

Widow/Widower

15

3.72%

6

1.48%

21

 

Table 5: Association of attitude score of study participants with socio demographic details

Socio demography

Attitude score

Total

Chi square

P value

Positive

Negative

n

%

n

%

n

%

Age

18-27

80

93.02

6

6.97

86

100

82.63

 

 

 

0.000

28-37

117

95.90

5

4.09

122

38-47

58

90.62

6

9.37

64

48-57

37

52.85

33

47.14

70

58-67

32

86.48

5

13.51

37

68-77

20

100

0

0

20

78+

3

75

1

25

4

Gender

Female

220

93.61

15

6.38

235

100

27.09

0.000

Male

127

75.59

41

24.40

168

Others

0

0

0

 

0

Educational status

Illiterate

65

68.42

30

31.57

95

100

34.18

0.000

Primary school

87

90.62

9

9.37

96

Middle school

91

94.79

5

5.20

96

High school

49

89.09

6

10.90

55

Graduate/ post graduate

36

92.30

3

7.69

39

Professional

19

86.36

3

13.63

22

Religion

Hindu

249

83.55

49

16.44

298

100

9.24

0.026

Muslim

52

88.13

7

11.86

59

Christian

42

100

0

0

42

Others

4

100

0

0

4

Type of Family

Joint

166

88.29

22

11.70

188

100

1.41

0.234

Nuclear

181

84.18

34

15.81

215

Socioeconomic status

Class 1

9

90

1

10

10

100

77.44

0.000

Class 2

121

96.03

5

3.96

126

Class 3

157

93.45

11

6.54

168

Class 4

48

57.14

36

42.85

84

Class 5

12

80

3

20

15

Age (82.63), Gender (27.09), Educational status (34.18) and Socio-economic status (77.44) was found to be positively associated with the attitude of study participants towards diabetic foot. (p=0.000)

 

The Focus group discussion comprising of six to eight participants in each group was conducted to gather insights into their experiences with diabetes care, the challenges they face, and the support they expect from family and the community. When discussing foot care among diabetic patients, participants were asked how often footwear should be inspected. While the majority responded with “sometimes,” a smaller number said “regularly.” One female participant emphasized that footwear should be checked every time before wearing. Our study found that 46.7% of respondents believed diabetic patients should inspect their footwear regularly. We also assessed their awareness of early signs of diabetic foot, such as a burning sensation in the feet. Most participants recognized this symptom, attributing their knowledge to advice from treating doctors or information provided while accompanying relatives to medical appointments. In our study around 53.1% of the participants were aware of this sign. When asked about the ideal material for socks for diabetic patients, many suggested materials that allow air circulation, though they were unfamiliar with the recommendation of woollen socks. Whereas 39% participants in our study were familiar with this information. Participants expressed concerns about the financial burden of managing diabetes. In our study 7.9% strongly agreed that they found it as a burden. They highlighted the high costs of treating complications and regular diagnostic tests as significant challenges. Some also mentioned the need to take time off work to accompany family members for routine check-ups, which added to their difficulties.

 

Overall, the participants displayed a good understanding of diabetes management and maintained a positive attitude toward the disease. Many acknowledged the importance of exercise in preventing diabetes. In this particular study 10.9% knew how sedentary lifestyle contributes to diabetes. However, a small subset, particularly from lower socioeconomic backgrounds or with limited education, demonstrated minimal awareness of proper foot care practices.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study shed light on the knowledge and attitudes of primary caregivers towards the prevention of diabetic foot syndrome in a rural tertiary care hospital. The

 

 

majority of participants were in the age group of 28-37, but in the study by Adeyemi TM et.al9, majority were in the age group of 55.65 years, and in another study Chellan G et.al8 the mean age was 59.9. This could be because in the Urban population it’s normally the spouse who are the primary care givers but in rural population it’s mostly the offspring. In the present study conducted in a rural hospital, Majority were females 235 (58.3), whereas in Chellan G et.al8   majority were males (67.5) & in Adeyemi TM et.al9, females (12) were a majority. This could mainly be due to the fact that women take the responsibility of taking care of the ones in illness. In this current study most of the primary care givers were married (298), similar results were found in Adeyemi TM et.al9 (15), but in Hanley G et.al10 most of them were single (60%). This could be due to fact that marriages are more common in India.. In our study most of them completed their education till high school (96), followed by illiterates (96). In the study done by Adeyemi TM et.al9 majority attained secondary education (10), similar to the study Hanley G et.al10 where secondary education was the most (87.1). This is because in rural India literacy rates are much lower.

 

The distribution of Socio-economic status in this study showed majority of participants belonging to class III 168 (41.7%) followed by class II 126 (31.3) whereas in the study conducted by Adeyemi TM et.al9 the monthly income was 2000-15000USD. In the study conducted by Alharbi MO et.al11 the monthly was 5000-10000 Saudi Riyal. This could be because most of the primary care givers are farmers or daily wage workers, hence belong to lower socio economic class.

 

In our study 217 (53.8%) had good knowledge that diabetics are likely to develop reduced blood flow in their feet, similar to the study conducted by Alharbi MO et.al11 146 (56.2%) had good knowledge too and in the study done by Hanley G et.al10, 127 (60.5%) had bad knowledge. This is because of the health education programs conducted in the rural set ups. In our study 244 (60.5%) people were aware that diabetic people have reduced sensation in their foot, similarly in studies conducted by Hanley G et.al10 81 (38.6%) and Alharbi MO et.al11 239 (92%) had good knowledge about the same. In current study, 221 (54.8%) were aware that they had to look after their feet as they cannot feel minor injuries, in Alharbi MO et.al11 majority demonstrated adequate knowledge, in Hanley G et.al,10171 (81.4%) aware, and in Alharbi MO et.al11 199 (76.5%) had good knowledge. In this present study 188 (46.7%) felt that it is necessary to check the inside of the foot wear for any wear and tears and in a study by Alharbi MO et.al11 159 (61.2%) felt the same. In the current study 195(48.4%) felt that smoking increases the chance of developing diabetic foot ulcers whereas Tuha A et al,12 study reveals that 182 (52.9%) people felt smoking affects the progression of diabetes and in Alharbi MO et.al11 study about 124 (47.7%) had no knowledge that smoking reduces the blood flow to the feet hence causing diabetic foot. In the current study, majority, 241 (59.8%) were aware of delayed wound healing in Diabetic patients and similar findings were seen in study by Tuha A et al,12 where majority, 235 (68.3%) had knowledge about delayed wound healing in patients with diabetes. In this study 200 (49.6%) think that walking bare foot outside the house is a risk factor for diabetic foot, in another study by Alharbi MO et.al11 106 (40.8%)  prefer walking bare foot as they are unaware that it is a risk factor for diabetic foot ulcers.

 

In this Current study about 73(18.9%) participants feel diabetic foot care as a burden and this could be mainly because of the financial expenditure during the regular check-ups and also the time spent towards taking special care of their feet. Only 160 (39.7%) of primary care givers feel confident about taking care of diabetic patient and this may be due to lack of knowledge and proper guidance in the rural population. In this study 135 (33.5%) participants expressed about not having the time to frequently check their relatives for the early signs of diabetic foot, whereas 161 (40%) had time, and 107 (26.6%) had a neutral opinion. This is because most of the Primary care givers were house wives who could take time to check their relative’s feet for early signs of diabetic foot. About 318 (78.9%) have positive attitude towards sedentary lifestyle contributing to diabetic foot. This could be due to constant awareness spread by the health care workers.

 

In this study 58% of participants had good knowledge which can be attributed to the health awareness and health education programs conducted by the ASHA and healthcare workers in the rural regions. In this study, 86.1% of primary caregivers have a positive attitude, largely due to the strong sense of compassion and responsibility within close families when it comes to caring for loved ones during illness in the rural areas.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study shed light on the knowledge and attitudes of primary caregivers towards the prevention of diabetic foot syndrome in a rural tertiary care hospital. The results revealed varying levels of knowledge among primary caregivers regarding the risk factors associated with diabetic foot syndrome. While a significant proportion of participants correctly identified key risk factors such as the likelihood of developing foot ulcers, reduced blood flow, and sensation in diabetic patients' feet. These findings underscore the importance of targeted educational interventions aimed at improving knowledge about diabetic foot syndrome among primary caregivers. In this study only about 58% of the primary care givers had good knowledge about the complications of diabetes mellitus such as diabetic foot, risk factors leading to development of diabetic foot and the preventive measures. Which suggests that another 42% of primary giver’s knowledge is poor, hence there is need to increase awareness programs through information, education and communication at village level using ASHA's and ANM’s (PHCO) plays important role in improving knowledge among primary care givers.

 

Also display of predesigned health education videos related to diabetes mellitus and its complications such as diabetic foot, risk factors leading to the development of diabetic foot and the preventive measures which can be at household level should be displayed in the patient waiting area's in all the health care facilities.

 

Focus group discussions by the field staff in the community will improve the knowledge about such health conditions and individuals get an opportunity to clear their myths.

 

Most of the participants felt the treatment for diabetes related complications such as Diabetic foot is a burden. Hence policy makers should provide the drugs and high end investigation either free of cost or at a concession rate for the people with low socioeconomic class.

 

The attitude of the primary care givers in this study was very good, around 86.1% people had good attitude.

REFERENCES
  1. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diabetes#tab=tab_1 .Last Accessed on 11th March 2023.
  2. Jia H, Wang X, Cheng J. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with diabetic foot prevention among rural adults with diabetes in North China. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022 May 20;10:876105.
  3. Diabetic association federation. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/idfawp/resource-files/2021/11/ (Last Accessed on 13th April 2023)
  4. Taksande BA, Thote M, Jajoo UN. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of foot care in patients with diabetes at central rural India. Journal of family medicine and primary care.
  5. Vibha SP, Kulkarni MM, Kirthinath Ballala AB, Kamath A, Maiya GA. Community based study to assess the prevalence of diabetic foot syndrome and associated risk factors among people with diabetes mellitus. BMC endocrine disorders. 2018 Dec; 18(1):1-9.
  6. Kaya Z, Karaca A. Evaluation of nurses’ knowledge levels of diabetic foot care management. Nursing research and practice. 2018 Jul 2; 2018.
  7. Ramanagara district census population 2011-2023 . Available from : https://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/265-ramanagara.html Last accessed on 19th January 2023.
  8. Chellan G, Srikumar S, Varma AK, Mangalanandan TS, Sundaram KR, Jayakumar RV, Bal A, Kumar H. Foot care practice–The key to prevent diabetic foot ulcers in India. The Foot. 2012 Dec 1;22(4):298-302.
  9. Adeyemi TM, Olatunji TL, Adetunji AE, Rehal S. Knowledge, practice and attitude towards foot ulcers and foot care among adults living with diabetes in Tobago: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;18(15):8021.
  10. Hanley G, Chiou PY, Liu CY, Chen HM, Pfeiffer S. Foot care knowledge, attitudes and practices among patients with diabetic foot and amputation in St. Kitts and Nevis. International Wound Journal. 2020 Oct;17(5):1142-52.
  11. Alharbi MO, Sulaiman AA. Foot care knowledge, attitude and practices of diabetic patients: A survey in Diabetes health care facility. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):3816-23.
  12. Tuha A, Getie Faris A, Andualem A, Ahmed Mohammed S. Knowledge and practice on diabetic foot self-care and associated factors among diabetic patients at Dessie referral hospital, northeast Ethiopia: mixed method. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity. 2021 Mar 17:1203-14.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
A Comparative Study of Merits and Demerits of Exteriorization of Uterus During Cesarean Delivery
...
Published: 17/03/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
A Clinico-Pathological Correlation Study of Fibroid Uterus in KIMS Hospital
...
Published: 17/03/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Assessement of Deitary Habits, Nutritional Status and Dietary Knowledge of Medical Students of SMS Medical College Jaipur.
...
Published: 12/03/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Contraception Among Married Women Attending Family Planning Clinics at a Tertiary Care Centre
...
Published: 17/03/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.