Background: This cross-sectional investigation examined parenting approaches and coping mechanisms among caregivers of children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Hyderabad, India, focusing on socioeconomic and clinical correlates. Methods: Participants included 100 caregivers (60 mothers, 40 fathers) of children aged 6–14 years diagnosed with ADHD per DSM-5 criteria. Validated instruments—Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale (VADPRS), Parenting Style Questionnaire, and Brief COPE Inventory—were administered. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlations and multivariate regression models. Results: Authoritarian parenting predominated (70%), followed by permissive (20%) and authoritative styles (10%). Emotion-focused coping (e.g., self-blame) was prevalent (65%), while problem-focused strategies were underutilized (15%). Socioeconomic status positively correlated with adaptive parenting (r = 0.209, p = 0.039), and treatment adherence predicted authoritative approaches (r = 0.455, p < 0.001). Older caregivers favored adaptive coping (r = 0.258, p = 0.010), whereas familial psychiatric histories were linked to maladaptive patterns (r = -0.405, p = 0.016). Conclusion: Findings underscore the need for culturally tailored interventions to promote authoritative parenting and problem-focused coping, particularly in low-resource settings.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), a neurodevelopmental condition affecting 3.4% of children globally[1], disrupts academic and social functioning while imposing substantial caregiver burden. In India, societal stigma and limited mental health resources exacerbate parental stress, often leading to maladaptive coping strategies. Parenting approaches—authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and negligent—significantly influence ADHD symptom trajectories and comorbid outcomes. While global studies highlight cultural variations in caregiving practices, data from low-resource settings remain sparse. This study investigates parenting styles and coping mechanisms among Indian caregivers, exploring socioeconomic, educational, and clinical moderators.
Study Design and Participants
A cross-sectional analysis enrolled 100 primary caregivers (60 mothers, 40 fathers) of ADHD-diagnosed children (DSM-5 criteria) at Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from December 2020 to May 2023.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children aged 6–14 years confirmed via VADPRS
- Caregivers providing written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Child IQ <70
Tools
Statistical Analysis
SPSS v29 analyzed correlations (Pearson’s r) and multivariate regressions. Significance thresholds: p < 0.05 (), p < 0.01 ().
Socio-Demographic Profile
Table 1: Socio-Demographic Characteristics
Variable |
Frequency (%) |
Caregiver Gender |
|
Female |
60% |
Male |
40% |
Socioeconomic Status |
|
Lower |
90% |
Middle |
10% |
Parenting Approaches
- Authoritarian: 70% (43 mothers, 27 fathers)
- Permissive: 20% (11 mothers, 9 fathers)
- Authoritative: 10% (6 mothers, 4 fathers)
Figure 1: Distribution of parenting styles by caregiver gender.
Coping Strategies
- Emotion-focused: 65% (e.g., self-blame, venting)
- Avoidant: 20% (e.g., denial)
- Problem-focused: 15% (e.g., planning, seeking support)
Significant Correlations
Dominance of Authoritarian Parenting
Consistent with prior Asian studies, authoritarian approaches predominated (70%), reflecting cultural emphases on behavioral control. Lower socioeconomic status predicted harsher discipline (p = 0.039), aligning with resource scarcity models.
Emotion-Focused Coping and Mental Health
High emotion-focused coping (65%) correlated with caregiver depression (r = -0.231, p = 0.021), mirroring global patterns. Problem-focused strategies’ underuse (15%) highlights intervention targets.
Clinical Implications
Authoritarian parenting and emotion-focused coping prevail among Indian caregivers of children with ADHD, shaped by education, income, and familial mental health. Targeted strategies promoting adaptive practices are critical for improving familial outcomes. Future studies should evaluate longitudinal impacts of caregiver interventions in low-resource settings.