Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
21 Views
3 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 6 (June, 2025) | Pages 783 - 786
Pharmacovigilance Assessment of Chemotherapy-Induced Adverse Effects in Patients with Tuberculosis
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Nalgonda, Telangana, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
May 9, 2025
Revised
May 24, 2025
Accepted
June 9, 2025
Published
June 16, 2025
Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy for tuberculosis (TB), though highly effective, is often associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that may impact treatment adherence and outcomes. Pharmacovigilance studies are essential to identify and characterize these reactions in clinical practice. Objectives: To assess the incidence, pattern, causality, severity, and outcomes of chemotherapy-induced ADRs in patients with TB. Methods: This prospective observational study included 100 adult TB patients receiving anti-tubercular chemotherapy. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and regimen details were recorded. ADRs were identified through active monitoring and evaluated for organ system involvement, causality (WHO–UMC criteria), and severity (Modified Hartwig scale). Outcomes were documented at follow-up. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: The mean age was 42.6 ± 13.2 years, with a male predominance (62%). Pulmonary TB accounted for 72% of cases, and 84% received the standard HRZE regimen. ADRs occurred in 68% of patients, totaling 92 events, with a median onset of 14 days (IQR: 9–21). Multiple ADRs were noted in 19% of patients. Gastrointestinal (26.1%), hepatobiliary (21.7%), cutaneous (15.2%), and neurological (13.0%) systems were most frequently affected. Causality was probable in 47.8%, possible in 40.2%, and certain in 12.0% of cases. Severity grading showed 45.6% mild, 42.4% moderate, and 12.0% severe ADRs. Recovery occurred in 91.3%, residual effects in 6.5%, and mortality in 1.1%. Conclusions: ADRs to TB chemotherapy are common, predominantly gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary, and require early detection and management to optimize adherence and outcomes. Strengthened pharmacovigilance systems are vital in TB control programs

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global public health challenge, with an estimated 10.6 million new cases and 1.3 million deaths reported worldwide in 2023 [1]. India bears the highest TB burden globally, contributing nearly 28% of all reported cases [2]. The introduction of standardized anti-tubercular chemotherapy regimens, particularly the fixed-dose combination of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE), has markedly improved cure rates and reduced disease transmission [3].

 

Despite these benefits, anti-tubercular regimens are frequently associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which may range from mild gastrointestinal disturbances to severe hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity, or life-threatening hypersensitivity responses [4,5]. Such ADRs can compromise treatment adherence, prolong therapy duration, and necessitate regimen modification or discontinuation, thereby increasing the risk of treatment failure, relapse, and the emergence of drug-resistant TB [4,5].

 

Pharmacovigilance, defined as the science and activities concerned with detecting, assessing, understanding, and preventing adverse effects of medicines, plays a critical role in TB control programs [2,4]. Active monitoring allows early recognition and timely management of ADRs, minimizing morbidity and preventing progression to severe complications. Although India has implemented a national pharmacovigilance framework through the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI), data on the real-world incidence and spectrum of ADRs among TB patients in specific regional treatment settings remain limited [1–5].

 

Against this background, the present study was undertaken at the Government Medical College, Mehboob Nagar, Telangana, to assess the incidence, pattern, causality, severity, and outcomes of chemotherapy-induced ADRs in TB patients. This study aims to contribute local evidence that can strengthen patient safety measures and optimize therapeutic outcomes in TB management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Setting

A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Mehboob Nagar, Telangana, from October 2024 to January 2025. The study was carried out in collaboration with the Department of Pulmonology and other relevant clinical units involved in tuberculosis (TB) management.

 

Study Population

Adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB and initiated on anti-tubercular chemotherapy during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Patients already on TB treatment prior to the study, those with incomplete medical records, or those unwilling to provide informed consent were excluded.

 

Sample Size

A total of 100 patients meeting the eligibility criteria were enrolled consecutively.

 

Data Collection

Demographic details, clinical history, TB type, comorbidities, and chemotherapy regimen were recorded at baseline. Patients were monitored throughout their treatment for the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using active pharmacovigilance methods, including structured interviews, clinical examinations, and review of laboratory data.

ADR Assessment

Suspected ADRs were documented with details on onset, clinical presentation, management, and outcome. Organ system classification was performed as per WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology (WHO-ART). Causality was assessed using the World Health Organization–Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO–UMC) scale. Severity was graded according to the Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale.

 

Data Analysis

Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed descriptively. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range (IQR), as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with tuberculosis undergoing chemotherapy were included in the analysis. The mean age of the cohort was 42.6 ± 13.2 years (range: 18–72 years), with a male predominance (62%). Pulmonary tuberculosis was the most common form (72%), and the majority received the standard HRZE regimen (84%), while 16% were on modified regimens due to comorbidities or drug resistance (Table 1).

 

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population (n = 100)

Parameter

Value

Mean Age ± SD (years)

42.6 ± 13.2

Age Range (years)

18–72

Gender Distribution

Male: 62 (62%), Female: 38 (38%)

Type of Tuberculosis

Pulmonary: 72 (72%), Extrapulmonary: 28 (28%)

Chemotherapy Regimen

HRZE: 84 (84%), Modified Regimen: 16 (16%)

 

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 68% of patients, with a total of 92 ADR events recorded. The median time to ADR onset was 14 days (IQR: 9–21), and multiple ADRs occurred in 19% of patients (Table 2).

 

Table 2. Incidence and Pattern of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)

Parameter

Number (%)

Patients with ≥1 ADR

68 (68%)

Total ADR Events

92

Median Time to ADR Onset (days)

14 (IQR: 9–21)

Multiple ADRs per patient

19 (19%)

 

The gastrointestinal system was the most frequently affected (26.1%), followed by hepatobiliary (21.7%), cutaneous (15.2%), and neurological (13.0%) manifestations. Less commonly, ADRs involved ototoxicity, psychiatric disturbances, hematologic changes, renal impairment, and other systems (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Organ System Distribution of ADRs

Gastrointestinal

24

26.1

Hepatobiliary

20

21.7

Cutaneous

14

15.2

Neurological

12

13.0

Ototoxicity

5

5.4

Psychiatric

4

4.3

Hematologic

4

4.3

Renal

3

3.3

Others

6

6.5

 

Figure 1.Organ System Distribution of ADRs

 

Causality assessment using the WHO–UMC criteria revealed that 47.8% of ADRs were classified as probable, 40.2% as possible, and 12.0% as certain. According to the Modified Hartwig severity scale, 45.6% were mild, 42.4% moderate, and 12.0% severe. Most patients (91.3%) recovered completely, 6.5% had residual effects, and one patient (1.1%) succumbed to severe hepatotoxicity with acute liver failure (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Causality, Severity, and Outcome of ADRs

Parameter

Category

Number (%)

Causality (WHO-UMC)

Probable

44 (47.8)

 

Possible

37 (40.2)

 

Certain

11 (12.0)

Severity (Modified Hartwig)

Mild

42 (45.6)

 

Moderate

39 (42.4)

 

Severe

11 (12.0)

Outcome

Recovered

84 (91.3)

 

Residual Effects

6 (6.5)

 

Death

1 (1.1)

DISCUSSION

In this prospective observational study of 100 tuberculosis patients receiving anti-tubercular chemotherapy, the overall incidence of ADRs was 68%, with the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems most commonly affected. These findings are consistent with previous pharmacovigilance analyses, where gastrointestinal intolerance and hepatotoxicity have been among the most frequently reported ADRs to first-line anti-TB drugs [6,7]. The predominance of gastrointestinal disturbances in our study may be attributed to the mucosal irritant effects of rifampicin and isoniazid, whereas hepatotoxicity likely reflects the cumulative hepatic burden of isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide [8].

 

The median onset of ADRs was 14 days, similar to the early-onset patterns observed in cohort studies and pharmacovigilance database analyses [9,10], highlighting the importance of intensive monitoring during the initial weeks of therapy. Notably, 19% of our patients developed multiple ADRs, a finding comparable to the observations of Sadiq et al. [11], where polypharmacy and comorbid conditions were significant contributors to ADR clustering.

Causality assessment revealed that nearly half of the ADRs were classified as probable, indicating a strong temporal relationship with drug intake and improvement upon dechallenge. Severe ADRs accounted for 12% of cases, a proportion similar to that reported in large-scale safety studies [7,8], with hepatotoxicity and severe cutaneous reactions being the primary causes. The mortality rate of 1.1% in our cohort, due to fulminant hepatic failure, is consistent with rare but serious outcomes documented in hospital-based retrospective analyses [13].

 

Our results emphasize the need for strengthening pharmacovigilance mechanisms within TB control programs. Early detection strategies, patient education, and baseline as well as periodic liver function testing especially within the first month of therapy could help reduce morbidity and mortality. Moreover, individualized risk assessment, incorporating patient age, comorbidities, and concomitant medication use, may improve safety outcomes [6,9,11,13].

 

Limitations of this study include the single-center design and relatively short follow-up, which may underestimate late-onset ADRs. Nonetheless, the prospective nature and active monitoring strengthen the validity of the results.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that adverse drug reactions to anti-tubercular chemotherapy are common, affecting over two-thirds of patients, with gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems most frequently involved. While the majority of ADRs were mild to moderate, a significant proportion were severe, including one fatal case of hepatotoxicity. Early onset of most ADRs underscores the importance of close monitoring, particularly in the initial treatment phase. Active pharmacovigilance, timely intervention, and patient education can minimize morbidity, improve adherence, and enhance therapeutic outcomes. Strengthening pharmacovigilance systems within TB control programs and adopting individualized monitoring strategies may further reduce the burden of drug-related complications in tuberculosis management.

REFERENCES
  1. Gholami, K., Kamali, E., Hajiabdolbaghi, M., & Shalviri, G. “Evaluation of Anti-Tuberculosis Induced Adverse Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.” Pharmacy Practice (Granada), vol. 4, no. 3, 2006, pp. 134–138. PMID: 25214900; PMCID: PMC4156846.
  2. Ravichandran, M., Rajaram, M., & Munusamy, M. “Pharmacovigilance of Antitubercular Therapy in Tuberculosis.” Cureus, vol. 14, no. 2, 4 Feb. 2022, e21915. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21915. PMID: 35273862; PMCID: PMC8901153.
  3. Achalu, D. L., Mohammed, F. G., & Teferi, M. “Magnitude and Impacts of Adverse Events of Injectable Containing Shorter Regimen in Programmatic Management of Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, vol. 19, 10 Nov. 2023, pp. 889–901. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S423163. PMID: 38023629; PMCID: PMC10644888.
  4. Massud, A., et al. “Frequency and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions Among Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients: Analysis From a Prospective Study.” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 13, 2 June 2022, 883483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.883483. PMID: 35747749; PMCID: PMC9211428.
  5. Chopra, D., Rehan, H. S., Sharma, V., & Mishra, R. “Chemotherapy-Induced Adverse Drug Reactions in Oncology Patients: A Prospective Observational Survey.” Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, vol. 37, no. 1, Jan.–Mar. 2016, pp. 42–46. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.177015. PMID: 27051157; PMCID: PMC4795375.
  6. Chung, S. J., Byeon, S. J., & Choi, J. H. “Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions to First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs Using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System.” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 37, no. 16, 25 Apr. 2022, e128. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e128. PMID: 35470602; PMCID: PMC9039191.
  7. Duga, A. L., Salvo, F., Kay, A., & Figueras, A. “Safety Profile of Medicines Used for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Descriptive Study Based on the WHO Database (VigiBase®).” Antibiotics, vol. 12, no. 5, 25 Apr. 2023, 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12050811. PMID: 37237714; PMCID: PMC10215388.
  8. Lan, Z., et al. “Drug-Associated Adverse Events in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.” The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, vol. 8, no. 4, Apr. 2020, pp. 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30047-3. PMID: 32192585; PMCID: PMC7384398.
  9. Zhang, Y., et al. “Adverse Events Associated with Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in China: An Ambispective Cohort Study.” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 23, 18 May 2017, pp. 2348–2356. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.904682. PMID: 28520704; PMCID: PMC5444822.
  10. Djochie, R. D. A., Anto, B. P., & Opare-Addo, M. N. A. “Determinants of Adverse Reactions to First-Line Antitubercular Medicines: A Prospective Cohort Study.” Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, vol. 16, no. 1, 8 June 2023, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-023-00577-6. PMID: 37291618; PMCID: PMC10249546.
  11. Sadiq, S., et al. “Adverse Drug Reaction Profile in Patients on Anti-Tubercular Treatment Alone and in Combination with Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy.” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 9, no. 10, Oct. 2015, FC01–FC04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/13452.6652. PMID: 26557538; PMCID: PMC4625257.
  12. Tan, A. J., et al. “A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Post-Marketing Safety of Durvalumab.” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, 13 May 2025, 16661. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01583-1. PMID: 40360595; PMCID: PMC12075497.
  13. Shi, C., et al. “Evaluation of Adverse Reactions Induced by Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs Among Hospitalized Patients in Wuhan, China: A Retrospective Study.” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 103, no. 20, 17 May 2024, e38273. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038273. PMID: 38758847; PMCID: PMC1109817.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Effect of OM meditation on cardiovascular parameters in hypertensive patients
...
Published: 22/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Endotracheal Size Estimation in Children: What is Latest? Different Methods and Correlation – A Prospective Observational Study
...
Published: 22/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Mucocutaneous Manifestations of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Children
...
Published: 20/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Influence of Ketogenic Diet on Gastric Functions, Motility, in Central Indian Subjects: A Case-Control Study on the
Published: 07/05/2024
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.