Since the description of PRES in 1996 by Hinchey et al, its being increasingly recognized and reported. With increased facilities like neuroimaging, it is animportant differential in the spectrum ofhypertensive encephalopathy. We retrospectively analyzed 5 cases of PRES in our ICU over a period of 1 year. Demographic parameters, presentations, etiologies, radiological findings including outcome was studied. Most common aetiologies were pregnancy induced eclampsia and immunosuppressant’s. ICU admissions were for uncontrolled hypertension, seizures, and low level of consciousness. Two patients were ventilated for airway protection. One patient had a complicated course and developed septicaemia and TTP. Two patients with renal involvement with PRES required hemodialysis. All patients recovered, none had residual neurological deficits. Given its diverse presentation from headache, blurring of vision to seizures and coma. Increased awareness with high degree of suspicion is the key for early identification and management of this nearly reversible condition.
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) also referred to as Reversible posterior cerebral edema syndrome, hyper perfusion encephalopathy, Posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, Brain capillary leak syndrome is a clinical-radiographic syndrome was first described by Hinchey in 1996 1.Subacute in onset, it has varied neurological features ranging from headache, loss of consciousness, seizures, visual disturbances and focal neurological deficits. It is often found to be associated with a number of conditions like malignant hypertension, pregnancy induced hypertension, antineoplastic treatments, cytotoxic and immunosuppressive drugs and certain autoimmune conditions.2 Because of its varied presentation as well as its association with a number of conditions, this rather newer entity in the spectrum of hypertensive encephalopathy patients is becoming more commoner than usual due to increased awareness not only among neurologists but also among other clinicians who are crucial in having a high index of suspicion to identify this syndrome. Management of patients with hypertensive emergencies and hypertensive encephalopathy which can range from mild neurological deficits to coma and seizures is often in done the multidisciplinary ICUs and knowledge about this condition and risk factors is essential to intensivists who are the primary care givers in these areas.
Though reversibilityis a hallmark feature,long term sequalae can be present if diagnosis and treatment is delayed which further stresses the importance of its early recognition.
Here we have 5 cases admitted with varied presentations and etiologies to our multidisciplinary ICU over a period of 1 year.
A retrospective analysis of 5 patients who were admitted to an adult MICU and diagnosed with PRES over a 1‑year period from 2021 to 2022 was done.
Demographic data like Age and Gender, past medical history, symptoms at presentation and other neurological symptoms including like Seizures, Headache, Visual disturbances, GCS with any Focal neurological deficit if any was noted. The peak blood pressure during the course, any requirement of ventilator, the radiological findings in CT and MRI was also noted. The patient’s status at discharge, MRI after recovery if any, outcome at 90 days were also followed up.
|
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
Case 4 |
Case 5 |
||||||
Age |
Mid 40’s |
Mid 20’s |
Mid 30s |
Late 20’’s |
Late 20’s |
||||||
Gender |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
female |
||||||
Past medical history |
Hypertension IgA nephropathy |
G2P1 36 weeks POG |
CKD-MPGN on mycophenolate, hypertension |
G2P2 37 weeks POG |
G2P1S/P LSCS POD 0 |
||||||
Presenting symptoms |
Bilateral lowerlimb swelling, decreased urine output |
Labor pains |
Abdominal distension, Pedal edema |
GTCS on Day 3 |
GTCS on Day 0 |
||||||
GCS |
15 |
15 |
13 |
9 |
4 |
||||||
Peak BP |
200/110-Day 0 |
200/100- Day 4 |
180/90 –Day 5 |
180/110- Day 3 |
170/100- Day 0 |
||||||
Seizures |
+ on Day1 |
+on Day 4 |
+on Day 5 |
+on Day 3 |
+on Day 0 |
||||||
Headache |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
||||||
Visual disturbances |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||||||
Focal neurological deficit |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||||||
fever |
- |
+on Day6 |
+ |
- |
+ |
||||||
Ventilation |
- |
- |
Yes- Day1 and Day 4 |
|
Yes –Day 0 |
||||||
CT scan |
Normal |
Bilateral parietal and occipital hypointensities |
|
|
|
||||||
MRI |
Frinto -parieto occipital hyperintensities |
Parieto occipital hyperintensities |
Fronto- Parietal and occipital hyperintensities |
Parieto occipital hyperintensities |
Parieto occipital hyperintensities |
||||||
Symmetrical/asymmetrical |
Symmetrical |
Symmetrical |
Symmetrical |
Symmetrical |
Asymmetrical-right |
||||||
MRI after recovery |
Not done |
Not done |
Done- shows resolution on Day 16 |
Done on Day 10 resolution seen |
Not done |
||||||
Neurological status at discharge from ICU |
Complete recovery by Day 5 Return of vision on day 5 |
Complete recovery by Day 10 |
Complete recovery by Day 9 |
Complete recovery by Day 7 |
Complete recovery by Day 7 |
||||||
Other issues |
CKD requiring MHD |
TTP |
CKD LRTI |
- |
- |
||||||
Other investigations |
-hyperkalemia -anaemia |
-Anaemia -thrombocytopenia -Peripheral smear -schistocytes -ADAMS T13 activity + |
Anaemia Oliguria Metabolic acidosis CXR -pulmonary edema |
Increased total count Proteinuria |
Increased total count
|
||||||
Followup at 90 day |
Stable,and on MHD |
Stable |
Stable , restarted on MMF and steroid |
Stable |
Stable |
Index:- GTCS –generalized tonic clonic seizures POG-period of gestation, MPGN-membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, LSCS-lower segment caesarean section , CKD –chronic kidney disease, MHD-maintenance haemodialysis ,TTP- thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, LRTI- lower respiratory tract infection, CXR-chest X ray ,MMF-mycophenolate mofetil
Image 1-T2 FLAIR showing an ill -defined high signal in the right occipital lobe-atypical presentation of PRES (Case 5)
Image 2 DWI image showing a subtle restricted diffusion in the right occipital lobe-maybe due to edema(case 5)
Image 3 –T2 FLAIR image showing ill -defined high signal changes in the right frontal lobe (case1)
Image 4 –DWI showing subtle restricted diffusion in the right frontal lobe(case1 )
Image 5 and 6 –T2 FLAIR images showing bilateral symmetrical hyperintensitites involving the frontal lobes, centrum semiovale and bilateral occipital lobes (case 3)