Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
48 Views
25 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 12 (None, 2025) | Pages 427 - 430
Risk Factors Associated with Mortality in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Single Centre Experience from Eastern India
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
*Malda medical College and hospital
2
Associate professor, malda medical College and hospital
3
Assistant Professor Department of Paediatrics Murshidabad Medical College & Hospital, Berhampore, Murshidaba
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Sept. 21, 2025
Revised
Nov. 29, 2025
Accepted
Dec. 17, 2025
Published
Dec. 25, 2025
Abstract

Background: Pediatric septic shock is a serious condition with high risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in lower-resource settings. Recognizing factors associated with mortality is critical to improving management outcomes.  Objective: To identify demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors associated with mortality in children with septic shock admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. Methods: Over one year, we conducted a prospective observational study in which we enrolled 125 children aged from one month to twelve years with septic shock. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), initiation of vasoactive medications, need for mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (AKI) and hematologic parameters. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the associations and independent predictors of mortality. Results: A total of 125 patients with clinically diagnosed septic shock were included with 64.8% of participants being under the age of five years. The overall rate of mortality was 34.4%. Pneumonia was found to be the most prevalent etiology (42.4% of cases). Independent, strong predictability of mortality included GCS less than or equal to 8 at admission, use of vasoactive medication, use of mechanical ventilation, AKI, and thrombocytopenia (p <0.05). While higher leukocyte counts were associated with worse outcomes, blood culture positivity was not statistically associated with outcome. Discussion: The findings affirm earlier research that recognized neurologic impairment, organ dysfunction, and cardiovascular instability as strong predictors of mortality in pediatric septic shock. The signs of pneumonia and organ dysfunction emphasize the importance of identifying and treating these cases early and with aggressive resuscitation in the emergency department.  Conclusion: Early identification of pediatric septic shock patients within high-risk categories using clinical assessment markers such as GCS, organ dysfunction, and need for hemodynamic support may help guide the implementation of intensive care interventions that may improve survival in resource-limited settings.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Septic shock is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children, especially in low- and middle-income settings with limited health systems. Pediatric septic shock is recognized by a systemic host response to infection that leads to circulatory, cellular, and metabolic alterations with a remarkably high risk of mortality. Despite advances in critical care, mortality remains extremely high, at least between 20% and 50% in many tertiary care settings (1–4).

Early recognition of clinical and laboratory risk factors that predict mortality in children with septic shock will aid in improving outcomes through timely interventions and resource allocations. Multiple studies have pointed to important, host-related factors such as altered mental status, hemodynamic status, organ dysfunction scores, and requirement of mechanical ventilation or vasoactive support as predictors of poor outcomes. Similarly, infection-related factors, including the etiological agent and presence of multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) appear to also be important factors in survival (5–8).

 

In India, pediatric septic shock remains a significant health problem, which varies in epidemiology and outcome because of heterogeneous health system access and prevalence of Infectious disease. Thus, there is a requirement for region-specific data to assist decision-making in a clinical context. Nonetheless, there are few prospective studies from Eastern India that assess the mortality risk factors among pediatric patients with septic shock (4,9).

 

In this regard, the current study focuses on analyzing the demographic, clinical, and laboratory predictors of mortality for children admitted to a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal with septic shock. This study aims to identify key risk factors related to death and add to the evidence-base for risk stratification, early intervention, and clinical management in resource-limited settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study Design and Setting This was a planned observational study held for a period of one year at a tertiary care teaching hospital in West Bengal, India. The study was granted approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee and the parents or guardians of all participating children, provided informed consent. Study Population Children aged between one month to twelve years old, diagnosed clinically with septic shock and admitted in the pediatric medicine ward and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) were enrolled. Septic shock was defined as per the Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force definitions which comprise infection with life-threatening cardiovascular dysfunction in children requiring vasoactive medications despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Inclusion criteria included children meeting septic shock criteria between the age of one month to twelve years old, treated in the study duration. Exclusion criteria involved congenital anomalies, chronic illness interfering with immunological status, and for those who did not consent. Sampling Method: Simple random sampling Sample Size: 125 cases Daniel sample size formula: n = Z²pq/d² where n = sample size, Z = 1.96; Z statistic for a level of confidence, p = expected prevalence or proportion (60.46% as per the study by Kurade A et al. 94) q=1-p d = absolute precision. n= (1.96)2pq/d2 = (1.96)2×60.46×39.54/92 = 9183.68/92=113.38, which is taken as 114, which was rounded to 125 cases. Data Collection Demographic data (age, gender), clinical features including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the time of admission, etiological diagnosis as well as treatment variables (use of vasoactive medications, requirement for mechanical ventilation), laboratory investigations (complete blood counts, blood cultures, and markers of organ dysfunction, such as acute kidney injury (AKI)) were all documented. Organ dysfunction was evaluated based on validated scores: PRISM-III and PELOD-2 at admission and subsequently in the course of hospitalization. Mortality was considered as a primary outcome. Statistical Analysis The analysis of data was performed through SPSS software (version 26.0). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentile, while continuous variables were expressed as the mean or median as appropriate. The associations explored between categorical variables and mortality outcome used the chi-square test or Fischer’s exact test. A multivariate logistic regression model analyzed independent predictors of mortality. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients with clinically diagnosed septic shock were included, with 64.8% being less than five years of age. Female children accounted for 54% of the cohort and the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.12. The overall mortality was 34.4%. The most common etiologic diagnosis was pneumonia at 42.4%, followed by urinary tract infections and meningitis (16.8% each).

 

Tables 1-3 provide demographic; clinical and laboratory factors compared among survivors and non-survivors with multivariate logistic regression identifying independent mortality risk factors.

 

Table 1 shows the distribution of demographic and clinical risk factors among survivors and non-survivors. The variables that demonstrated no difference between groups were age under five years and male sex; however, strong associations were found in the remaining clinical variables in accordance with mortality. Specifically, a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of ≤8 upon admission was observed more commonly in those who did not survive, attesting to the importance of neurologic status as a prognostic factor. Additionally, pneumonia as the primary etiology, use of vasoactive medications, mechanical ventilation and acute kidney injury (AKI) were also associated with increased mortality. These clinical factors indicate that organ dysfunction and interventions associated with critical care are strong predictors of poor outcomes.

 

 

 

Table 1: Demographic and Clinical Risk Factors Associated with Mortality

Risk Factor

Survivors

(n, %)

Non-survivors

(n, %)

p-value

(Chi-square)

Age <5 years

53 (65.6%)

32 (64.0%)

0.81

Male

39 (48.1%)

13 (46.4%)

0.89

GCS ≤8 at admission

5 (6.2%)

21 (42.0%)

<0.01

Pneumonia Etiology

27 (33.3%)

26 (52.0%)

0.03

Use of vasoactive Meds

17 (21.0%)

21 (42.0%)

<0.01

Mechanical Ventilation

13 (16.1%)

23 (46.0%)

<0.01

AKI Present

11 (13.6%)

23 (46.0%)

<0.01

Legend: GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; AKI: Acute Kidney Injury; p-value derived using Chi-square test.

Table 2 highlights the association between pertinent laboratory parameters and the fatalities for the study population. Non-survivors had significantly higher rates of thrombocytopenia and metabolic acidosis compared to survivors, signifying that derangements in hematologic and metabolic function are both valuable indicators of severity and poor outcomes. With the notable exception of the total leukocyte count (absence of leukopenia or leukocytosis) and blood culture positivity, laboratory parameters did not demonstrate significant differences between survivors and non-survivors (suggesting mortality to be less influenced by infection and influenced receptively by organ dysfunction).

 

 

Table 2: Laboratory Parameters and Mortality

Laboratory Parameter

Survivors (n, %)

Non-survivors (n, %)

p-value

Leucopenia

10 (12.3%)

12 (24%)

0.09

Leukocytosis

15 (18.5%)

14 (28%)

0.18

Thrombocytopenia

10 (12.3%)

22 (44%)

<0.01

Positive Blood Culture

10 (12.3%)

6 (12%)

0.95

Metabolic Acidosis

7 (8.6%)

19 (36%)

<0.01

Legend: p-value calculated using Chi-square test.

Table 3 displays the results of multivariate logistic regression, which identified independent mortality predictors. A GCS of ≤8 was established as the strongest predictor of mortality, increasing risk by more than 5 times. Other independent predictors of mortality included vasoactive medication, AKI, thrombocytopenia, and mechanical ventilation. In sum, organ dysfunction markers and multiorgan dysfunction with hemodynamic instability are critical determinants of mortality in critically ill patients.

Table 3: Multivariate Analysis of Predictors of Mortality

Predictor

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

p-value

GCS ≤8

5.6 (2.1–14.7)

<0.01

Vasoactive Medication

3.2 (1.3–7.8)

<0.01

Mechanical Ventilation

2.8 (1.1–7.0)

0.03

AKI

4.1 (1.5–11.2)

<0.01

Thrombocytopenia

2.9 (1.1–7.8)

0.03

Legend: GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale; AKI: Acute Kidney Injury; CI: Confidence Interval; Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% CI presented.

DISCUSSION

This research investigated factors linked to mortality in pediatric septic shock at an eastern Indian tertiary care facility. The overall mortality of 34.4%, while worrisome, is consistent with the existing literature and aligns well with previously described ranges in resource-limited contexts between 20% and 40%. This finding continues to underscore the difficulty of managing septic shock in children, especially in resource-constrained locations (1,4,7).

We identified several independent predictors of mortality, including depressed neurologic status on admission (GCS ≤8), need for vasoactive support, need for mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (AKI), and thrombocytopenia. The relationship between low GCS and risk of mortality is consistent with previous studies that demonstrated encephalopathy was an indicator of organ dysfunction and poor prognosis in children. Vasoactive medication and mechanical ventilation both indicate hemodynamic instability and respiratory failure, which have been clearly demonstrated as strong mortality predictors in cohort studies of pediatric septic shock comparing survival in children with septic shock and susceptibility to severe disease (5,7,8,10).

Similarly, AKI was a significant risk factor which also demonstrates the multi-organ dysfunction burden in children who died from septic shock. This corroborates previous studies demonstrating the incidence or AKI commonly complicates pediatric sepsis and is implicated as a serious complication associated with mortality. Platelet count abnormalities, especially thrombocytopenia, were independently related to mortality, consistent with previous studies noting platelet dysfunction as a contributor to sepsis-related coagulopathy and organ failure (6,8,11–13).

In contrast, our findings revealed no difference in leukocyte count abnormalities (leucopenia/leukocytosis) and positive blood cultures between survivors and non-survivors; the literature contains mixed evidence, and such parameters can sometimes be unreliable predictors because of differences in the source of infection and host response (9,14).

That pneumonia was the most common etiology is consistent with current Indian and global pediatric septic shock epidemiology in which respiratory infection is a leading cause of sepsis. Understanding region-specific etiologies can facilitate effective identification, prevention, and treatment of sepsis (4,9,15).

This prospective study in a well-defined pediatric cohort contributes useful data to the current evidence base, especially from Eastern India where very limited evidence exists to our knowledge. However, it does have limitations, such as a single center and moderate sample size, and these limitations may hinder generalizability throughout India.

CONCLUSION

This study found that children with septic shock admitted to a tertiary hospital in Eastern India had a high mortality rate of 34.4%. The primary independent factors associated with mortality were depressed neurological level (GCS ≤8), use of vasoactive support, mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, and thrombocytopenia. These factors are an indication of the degree of multi-organ failure and hemodynamic compromise in fatal cases. Early detection and focused management of these high-risk characteristics are important to improving outcomes. Regional pattern of etiology, pneumonia as the leading cause, need focus on prevention and treatment to possibly improve mortality. This adds meaningful region-specific evidence to influence clinical decision-making and resource allocation in pediatric critical care.

REFERENCES

1.       Rusmawatiningtyas D, Rahmawati A, Makrufardi F, Mardhiah N, Murni IK, Uiterwaal CSPM, et al. Factors associated with mortality of pediatric sepsis patients at the pediatric intensive care unit in a low-resource setting. BMC Pediatr. 2021 Oct 25;21:471.

2.       J SL. Predictors of Mortality in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study Conducted At Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital in Southern Province Of India. Journal of Contemporary Clinical Practice. 2025 Aug 14;11:423–8.

3.       de Souza DC, Machado FR. Epidemiology of Pediatric Septic Shock. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2019 Mar;8(1):3–10.

4.       Kumar A, Singh S. Retrospective Analysis of the Outcomes of Pediatric Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock.

5.       Workman JK, Bailly DK, Reeder RW, Dalton HJ, Berg RA, Shanley TP, et al. Risk Factors for Mortality in Refractory Pediatric Septic Shock Supported with Extracorporeal Life Support. ASAIO J. 2020;66(10):1152–60.

6.       Chen J, Huang H, Zhang R, Fu Y, Jing C. Risk factors associated with mortality and pathogen characteristics of bloodstream infection-induced severe sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol [Internet]. 2025 Feb 3 [cited 2025 Nov 5];15. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1492208/full

7.       J SL. Predictors of Mortality in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study Conducted At Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital in Southern Province Of India. Journal of Contemporary Clinical Practice. 2025 Aug 14;11:423–8.

8.       Liu R, Greenstein JL, Fackler JC, Bergmann J, Bembea MM, Winslow RL. Prediction of Impending Septic Shock in Children With Sepsis. Crit Care Explor. 2021 June 15;3(6):e0442.

9.       Jayapal K. Predicting mortality from septic shock among pediatric population in emergency room. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2020 Oct 21;7(11):2095–100.

10.   de Souza DC, Machado FR. Epidemiology of Pediatric Septic Shock. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2019 Mar;8(1):3–10.

11.   Menon K, McNally JD, Zimmerman JJ, Agus MSD, O’Hearn K, Watson RS, et al. Primary Outcome Measures in Pediatric Septic Shock Trials: A Systematic Review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;18(3):e146–54.

12.   Karla OD, Rodolfo JJ, Martha AR, Almudena LG, Sergio BP, Liliana PV, et al. 30-Day Mortality Risk Factors in Pediatric Patients with Bloodstream Infection Due to Enterobacterales: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance [Internet]. 2025 Oct 10 [cited 2025 Nov 5]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525002188

13.   Usluer E, Anıl AB, Anıl M, Kamit F, Altuğ Ü, Özçifçi G, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Mortality Predictors in Patients Hospitalized in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit due to Sepsis. Journal of Behcet Uz Children’s Hospital [Internet]. 2025 July 8 [cited 2025 Nov 5]; Available from: https://behcetuzdergisi.com/articles/clinical-outcomes-and-mortality-predictors-in-patients-hospitalized-in-the-pediatric-intensive-care-unit-due-to-sepsis/jbuch.galenos.2025.03453

14.   Iskander KN, Osuchowski MF, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Kurosawa S, Stepien D, Valentine C, et al. Sepsis: Multiple Abnormalities, Heterogeneous Responses, and Evolving Understanding. Physiol Rev. 2013 July;93(3):1247–88.

15.   Watson RS, Carrol ED, Carter MJ, Kissoon N, Ranjit S, Schlapbach LJ. The burden and contemporary epidemiology of sepsis in children. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2024 Sept 1;8(9):670–81.

Recommended Articles
Research Article
Efficacy and Safety of Alternate-Day Versus Daily Teneligliptin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled on Metformin and Sulfonylureas: An Open-Label Randomised Study
Published: 30/08/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ABNORMALITIES IN CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE: A HOSPITAL-BASED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
...
Published: 25/12/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Investigating a potential correlation between ABO-Rh blood types and the occurrence of Medulloblastoma
...
Published: 09/10/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Comparative evaluation of Ambu Aura-i and FastrachTM intubating laryngeal mask airway for tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study
...
Published: 25/12/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.