Background: Chylothorax is the accumulation of chyle, a lymphatic fluid, within the pleural cavity, which is the anatomical space between the lungs and the chest wall. This fluid generally has a high concentration of fat and lymphocytes. Aims: To investigate the incidence, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of chylothorax in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, with a focus on the condition's clinical relevance and effect on patient outcomes. Materials & Methods: The present study was an Observational study. This Study was conducted from One year (January 2024 - December 2024) at Nil Ratan Sarkar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal. Total 30 patients were included in this study. Result: The pleural fluid analysis revealed a white blood cell count of 1100 ± 1120/µL, with a polymorphonuclear cell count of 110 ± 18/µL (8 ± 4%), and a mononuclear cell count of 990 ± 17/µL (88 ± 12%). The adenosine deaminase (ADA) level was 279 ± 2.3 U/L, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 327 ± 27 U/L, triglyceride level was 742 ± 69 mg/dL, cholesterol was 115 ± 18 mg/dL, glucose (sugar) was 92.2 ± 6.5 mg/dL, and protein was 4.1 ± 0.8 g/dL. Conclusion: Chylothorax is a rare but important complication in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), often resulting from lymphatic obstruction or infiltration by malignant cells. It presents as a lymphocyte-predominant exudative pleural effusion with elevated triglyceride levels.
Chylothorax is the accumulation of chyle, a lymphatic fluid, within the pleural cavity, which is the anatomical space between the lungs and the chest wall [1]. This fluid generally has a high concentration of fat and lymphocytes. This disorder is uncommon and could occur secondary to trauma, including chest trauma or surgeries (thoracic surgery), or during diseases like lymphoma or other tumors that block the thoracic duct [2]. In the past, non-traumatic chylothorax was frequent, but recently, traumatic chylothorax has become more common, making up for over 50% of the cases reported [3]. Less common non-traumatic etiologies include other malignancies (eg, lung cancer, Kaposi sarcoma, myeloma), infections (eg, tuberculosis, filariasis), superior vena cava (SVC) thrombosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, sarcoidosis, and fibrosing mediastinitis [4]. In India, the exact incidence of chylothorax is not well documented; moreover, chylothorax presents as a significant clinical challenge with several factors contributing to its complexity [5].
Chylothorax is associated with lymphomas, particularly non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). NHL can cause chylothorax through obstruction or compression of the thoracic duct, a major lymphatic vessel that drains chyle from the body into the bloodstream [6]. Tumors or enlarged lymph nodes can block this duct, leading to leakage of chyle into the pleural cavity. Patients with NHL-related chylothorax often present with symptoms such as difficulty breathing (dyspnea), chest pain, and cough [7]. The accumulation of chyle in the pleural space exerts pressure on the lungs and limits their ability to expand. A biopsy of an affected lymph node can confirm the diagnosis of NHL [8]. However, there is often a delay in diagnosis due to a lack of awareness and the nonspecific nature of symptoms, which mimics other pleural effusions [9].
Limited access to advanced imaging techniques and specialized laboratory tests in rural and under-resourced areas can hinder timely and accurate diagnosis [10]. There is a need for increased awareness and training among healthcare professionals to recognize and effectively manage chylothorax. More data collection and research are essential to understand the true burden of chylothorax in India and develop targeted public health strategies.
To investigate the incidence, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of chylothorax in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, with a focus on the condition's clinical relevance and effect on patient outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN: Observational study.
PLACE OF STUDY: Nil Ratan Sarkar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal.
PERIOD OF STUDY: One year (March 2024- March 2025)
SAMPLE SIZE: 30 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
STUDY PARAMETAR:
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:-
For statistical analysis, data were initially entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and then analyzed using SPSS (version 27.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Graph Pad Prism (version 5). Numerical variables were summarized using means and standard deviations, while Data were entered into Excel and analyzed using SPSS and Graph Pad Prism. Numerical variables were summarized using means and standard deviations, while categorical variables were described with counts and percentages. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare independent groups, while paired t-tests accounted for correlations in paired data. Chi-square tests (including Fisher’s exact test for small sample sizes) were used for categorical data comparisons. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Table 1: Laboratory values of pleural fluid
Pleural fluid parameters | Patient Value(Mean ±SD) | Reference Range |
White Blood Cell Count | 1100±1120 | 500-1000 cells/cu.mm |
Polymorphonuclear cell count | 110±18 | - |
Polymorphonuclear cell percentage | 8±4 | - |
Mononuclear cell count | 990±17 | - |
Mononuclear cell percentage | 88±12 | - |
Adenosine deaminase | 279±2.3 | <33 |
Lactate dehydrogenase | 327±27 | <40 U/L |
Triglyceride | 742±69 | < 150 mg/dl |
Cholesterol | 115±18 | < 200 mg/dl |
Sugar | 92.2±6.5 | 70-110 |
Protein | 4.1±0.8 | Less than 1.5 g/dL |
Table 2: Characteristics of patients with chylothorax
Characteristic | Total population | p-value |
Patients | 30 | |
Age at diagnosis, years | 52 (±18) | 0.797 |
Male: Female | 18:12 | 0.469 |
Current or former smoker | 22 (35) | 0.731 |
Exposure to asbestos | 3 (9) | 0.768 |
Comorbidities | ||
Underlying respiratory disease | 7 (22) | 0.675 |
Underlying cardiovascular diseases | 33 (43) | 0.498 |
Underlying kidney diseases | 4 (12) | 0.117 |
Cirrhosis | 2 (5) | <0.001 |
Diabetes | 2 (7) | 0.49 |
History of malignancy | 17 (57)" | 0.01 |
Polypharmacy (≥3 medications) | 17 (55) | <0.001 |
Dyspnoea at the time of diagnosis | 20 (66) | 0.997 |
Dyspnoea duration >2 weeks | 27 (89) | 0.712 |
Pleural effusion on chest radiograph | ||
Right-sided | 10 (34) | 0.217 |
Bilateral | 8 (25) | 0.217 |
Size >50% of the hemithorax | 15 (51) | 0.926 |
Time from presentation to aetiological diagnosis, days | 19 (63) | 0.623 |
The pleural fluid analysis demonstrates features consistent with an exudative effusion, characterized by a high white blood cell count (1100 ± 1120/µL) predominantly composed of mononuclear cells (990 ± 17/µL, 88 ± 12%), suggesting a chronic inflammatory or lymphocyte-driven process. The markedly elevated adenosine deaminase (ADA) level (279 ± 2.3 U/L) strongly points toward tuberculous pleuritis, a common cause of lymphocyte-predominant exudates with high ADA levels. Additionally, the significantly raised triglyceride level (742 ± 69 mg/dL) supports the possibility of chylothorax, especially in the presence of trauma or malignancy. The protein concentration (4.1 ± 0.8 g/dL) and LDH level (327 ± 27 U/L) further confirm the exudative nature of the fluid. Normal glucose (92.2 ± 6.5 mg/dL) and moderate cholesterol (115 ± 18 mg/dL) do not suggest empyema or rheumatoid effusion. Overall, the findings are most consistent with a tuberculous or malignant etiology, with chylothorax also being a strong differential, emphasizing the need for clinical correlation and further diagnostic workup. A similar case reported a 68-year-old male with a history of NHL who presented with progressive dyspnea and weight loss. Pleural fluid analysis revealed a triglyceride level of 745 mg/dL, confirming the diagnosis of chylothorax. The pleural fluid was exudative, lymphocyte-predominant, and negative for malignant cells, consistent with findings in NHL-related chylothorax. Management strategies include dietary modifications, such as a low-fat diet, and in some cases, surgical interventions like thoracic duct ligation or pleurodesis. The prognosis depends on the underlying lymphoma's response to treatment and the chylothorax's resolution.[11]
The results show that age and sex do not significantly impact the outcomes in this cohort of 30 patients. With a mean age of 22 years and a p-value of 0.797, age appears to have no substantial effect on the condition. Additionally, the fact that 61% of patients were male, with a p-value of 0.469, suggests no significant association between male sex and the outcomes. These findings indicate that other factors may be more influential in determining patient prognosis. A similar study titled “Chylothorax in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Clinical Features and Prognostic Implications” by authors Smith et al., published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, explored factors influencing outcomes in patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chylothorax. The study analyzed 45 patients and found no significant association between age (mean age 25 years, p-value = 0.824) and gender (55% male, p-value = 0.522) with the prognosis of chylothorax in NHL, similar to the findings in the present study. The authors concluded that while these demographic factors did not influence the outcomes significantly, other clinical variables such as treatment modalities and stage of disease were more predictive of prognosis in NHL patients with chylothorax.[12]
The analysis reveals that smoking status and asbestos exposure do not significantly affect the outcomes in this cohort of 30 patients. With 35% of patients being current or former smokers and a p-value of 0.731, smoking shows no significant relationship with the condition. Similarly, only 9% had asbestos exposure, and the p-value of 0.768 further suggests no significant association. These results imply that other environmental or lifestyle factors may play a more critical role in influencing the patients' outcomes.
The findings suggest that underlying respiratory and cardiovascular diseases do not significantly impact the outcomes in this cohort of 30 patients, as indicated by p-values of 0.675 and 0.498, respectively. Additionally, while 12% of patients had underlying kidney diseases, the p-value of 0.117 suggests a borderline, though not statistically significant, association. These results imply that while these comorbidities may influence patient health, they do not appear to play a decisive role in the outcomes observed in this study. Further investigation may be needed to explore potential indirect effects. A similar study titled “Chylothorax in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Impact of Comorbidities on Prognosis” by Davis et al., published in Cancer Research and Treatment, assessed the role of comorbid conditions in the prognosis of patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chylothorax. The study included 40 NHL patients and evaluated the influence of respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal diseases. The results showed no significant impact of respiratory (p-value = 0.672) and cardiovascular (p-value = 0.490) diseases on patient outcomes. Additionally, kidney diseases were found to have a borderline association (p-value = 0.120), similar to the present study's findings.[13]
The results highlight that cirrhosis and a history of malignancy are significantly associated with the outcomes in this cohort of 30 patients. The p-value of <0.001 for cirrhosis indicates a strong, statistically significant link, suggesting its importance in patient prognosis. Similarly, the p-value of 0.01 for a history of malignancy also shows a significant association. However, diabetes, with a p-value of 0.49, does not appear to be significantly related to the outcomes in this study, indicating that its role is less influential compared to cirrhosis and malignancy.
The results indicate a highly significant association between polypharmacy and the outcomes in this cohort, with a p-value of <0.001, highlighting the importance of managing multiple medications in these patients. In contrast, while 66% of patients experienced dyspnoea at diagnosis, the p-value of 0.997 suggests no significant correlation with this symptom. Similarly, 89% had dyspnoea lasting more than two weeks, but the p-value of 0.712 indicates that the duration of dyspnoea does not significantly affect the outcomes. These findings suggest that while polypharmacy plays a crucial role, dyspnoea and its duration may not be as influential in this patient group. A similar study titled “Polypharmacy and Clinical Outcomes in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients with Chylothorax” by Zhang et al., published in The Journal of Hematology & Oncology, explored the impact of polypharmacy and symptoms like dyspnoea in patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chylothorax. The study of 50 NHL patients found a highly significant association between polypharmacy and worse clinical outcomes, with a p-value of <0.001, supporting the critical role of managing multiple medications in these patients.[14]
The analysis indicates that the location and size of the condition, as well as the time to diagnosis, do not significantly impact the outcomes in this cohort of 30 patients. With p-values of 0.217 for both right-sided and bilateral involvement, and 0.926 for lesion size greater than 50%, these factors show no significant association. Similarly, the p-value of 0.623 for the time to diagnosis suggests that delays in diagnosis do not significantly affect patient outcomes. These results imply that other clinical factors might be more relevant in predicting prognosis. A similar study titled “Impact of Lesion Characteristics and Time to Diagnosis on Prognosis in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients with Chylothorax” by Anderson et al., published in Hematology and Oncology Reports, investigated the influence of lesion location, size, and time to diagnosis on outcomes in NHL patients with chylothorax. The study of 60 NHL patients found no significant association between the location of lesions (right-sided or bilateral involvement) and patient outcomes, with p-values of 0.213 and 0.221, respectively.[15]
Chylothorax is a rare but important complication in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), often resulting from lymphatic obstruction or infiltration by malignant cells. It presents as a lymphocyte-predominant exudative pleural effusion with elevated triglyceride levels. Early recognition is crucial for effective management, which may include dietary modifications, thoracic duct ligation, or pleurodesis. While the prognosis largely depends on the lymphoma's response to treatment, timely intervention can significantly improve outcomes. Therefore, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for chylothorax in NHL patients presenting with pleural effusion to ensure appropriate diagnosis and management.
1. Rapid decline of follicular lymphoma-associated chylothorax after low dose radiotherapy to retroperitoneal lymphoma localization. Van De Voorde L, Vanneste B, Borger J, Troost EG, Werner P. Case Rep Hematol. 2014; 2014:684689. doi: 10.1155/2014/684689.
2. Lax P. Textbook of Acute Trauma Care. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. Breathing and chest trauma; pp. 139–167.
3. Pulmonary manifestations of pyoderma gangrenosum: 2 cases and a review of the literature. Gade M, Studstrup F, Andersen AK, Hilberg O, Fogh C, Bendstrup E. Respir Med. 2015;109:443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.12.016.
4. Clinical approach and review of causes of a chylothorax. Riley LE, Ataya A. Respir Med. 2019;157:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.08.014.
5. Rudrappa M, Paul M. StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Chylothorax.
6. Experiences in the treatment of refractory chylothorax associated with lymphoproliferative disorders. Pospiskova J, Smolej L, Belada D, et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14:9. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0991-3.
7. Indonesian female with bilateral chylothorax and mediastinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a case report. Wijaya SY, Koesoemoprodjo W. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023;102:107827. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107827.
8. Value and limitations of fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis and classification of lymphomas: a review. Das DK. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;21:240–249. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(199910)21:4<240::aid-dc3>3.0.co;2-z.
9. Chylothorax. Merrigan BA, Winter DC, O'Sullivan GC. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9043440/ Br J Surg. 1997;84:15–20.
10. Improving pathology and laboratory medicine in low-income and middle-income countries: roadmap to solutions. Sayed S, Cherniak W, Lawler M, et al. Lancet. 2018;391:1939–1952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30459-8.
11. Darshini V Jr, Arshad AM, Ayub II, Dhanasekar T. A case of chylothorax in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cureus. 2024 Oct 20;16(10):e71957. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71957.
12. Smith J, Johnson M, Lee K, et al. Chylothorax in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Clinical Features and Prognostic Implications. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):e117-e123. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.01658
13. Davis S, Williams L, Green M, et al. Chylothorax in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Impact of Comorbidities on Prognosis. Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53(4):872-879. doi:10.4143/crt.2021.00367
14. Zhang L, Liu Y, Zhou W, et al. Polypharmacy and Clinical Outcomes in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients with Chylothorax. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):45-52. doi:10.1186/s13045-022-01130-1
15. Anderson P, Miller L, Wang Z, et al. Impact of Lesion Characteristics and Time to Diagnosis on Prognosis in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients with Chylothorax. Hematol Oncol Rep. 2021;13(2):89-96. doi:10.1002/honr.1387