Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
99 Views
8 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 3 (March, 2025) | Pages 595 - 598
To assess reproductive performance of couples with previous miscarriages and perinatal deaths
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RCSM GMC Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 11, 2025
Revised
Feb. 22, 2025
Accepted
March 3, 2025
Published
March 20, 2025
Abstract

Background: Recurrent miscarriages and perinatal deaths pose significant challenges to reproductive health, impacting couples both physically and emotionally. Assessing the reproductive performance of such couples can provide valuable insights into pregnancy outcomes, risk factors, and potential interventions to improve fetal survival rates. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 150 couples with a history of at least one miscarriage or perinatal death. Clinical and demographic data were collected, including maternal age, body mass index (BMI), obstetric history, and underlying medical conditions. Participants underwent hormonal profiling, genetic testing, and ultrasound evaluations to assess uterine and fetal health. Pregnancy outcomes, including live birth rate, miscarriage rate, and perinatal complications, were analyzed over a follow-up period of 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and logistic regression tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: Of the 150 couples, 80% achieved pregnancy within the study period. The live birth rate was 65%, while 20% experienced recurrent pregnancy loss, and 15% had preterm deliveries. Factors such as advanced maternal age (>35 years), obesity (BMI > 30), and thrombophilic disorders were significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (p < 0.01). Couples receiving targeted medical interventions, including progesterone support and low-dose aspirin therapy, had improved pregnancy outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Couples with previous miscarriages and perinatal deaths face an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early identification and management of risk factors, including maternal health optimization and medical interventions, can enhance reproductive performance and fetal survival rates. Comprehensive counseling and personalized treatment approaches are essential for improving pregnancy success in this population.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and perinatal deaths remain significant concerns in reproductive medicine, affecting approximately 1–2% of couples attempting conception (1). Miscarriage, defined as pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of gestation, and perinatal mortality, which includes fetal death after 28 weeks of gestation and neonatal death within the first week of life, contribute to both psychological distress and increased medical interventions (2,3). Various etiological factors, including genetic abnormalities, endocrine disorders, uterine anomalies, thrombophilic conditions, and immunological dysfunctions, have been implicated in these adverse pregnancy outcomes (4).

 

Advanced maternal age has been associated with a higher incidence of pregnancy loss due to increased chromosomal abnormalities, particularly aneuploidy (5). Additionally, metabolic conditions such as obesity and diabetes mellitus have been linked to impaired placental function and an elevated risk of fetal demise (6). The role of thrombophilic disorders, including antiphospholipid syndrome and factor V Leiden mutation, in recurrent pregnancy loss has been extensively studied, with evidence suggesting that anticoagulation therapy can improve live birth rates in affected women (7).

 

Optimizing reproductive performance in couples with a history of miscarriage and perinatal mortality requires a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing preconception counseling, targeted investigations, and individualized treatment plans (8). Recent advances in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), such as preimplantation genetic testing and endometrial receptivity assessment, have shown promise in enhancing pregnancy outcomes in high-risk couples (9). However, there is still a need for further research to establish standardized protocols for managing this vulnerable population.

 

This study aims to evaluate the reproductive performance of couples with previous miscarriages and perinatal deaths, identify associated risk factors, and assess the effectiveness of medical interventions in improving pregnancy outcomes. By understanding these variables, clinicians can develop evidence-based strategies to enhance maternal and fetal health, ultimately reducing the burden of pregnancy loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 150 couples with a history of at least one miscarriage or perinatal loss. Couples were recruited from the outpatient gynecology and reproductive medicine clinics. Inclusion criteria comprised women aged 20–40 years with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (≥2 consecutive miscarriages) or perinatal death (fetal demise after 28 weeks of gestation or neonatal death within the first week of life). Exclusion criteria included known chromosomal abnormalities in either partner, chronic maternal illnesses such as uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension, and structural uterine abnormalities requiring surgical intervention.

 

Data Collection

Detailed demographic and clinical histories were obtained, including maternal age, body mass index (BMI), obstetric history, lifestyle factors, and any prior medical conditions. Laboratory investigations included hormonal profiling (thyroid function tests, prolactin, and progesterone levels), genetic testing (karyotyping for both partners), thrombophilia screening (antiphospholipid antibodies, protein C and S, and factor V Leiden mutation), and infectious disease screening.

 

Ultrasound evaluations, including transvaginal sonography and Doppler studies, were performed to assess uterine morphology, endometrial thickness, and placental blood flow. Hysterosalpingography or saline infusion sonography was conducted when uterine anomalies were suspected. Sperm analysis, including DNA fragmentation assessment, was performed for male partners.

 

Intervention and Follow-Up

Couples received individualized treatment based on identified risk factors. Those with hormonal imbalances were managed with appropriate medications, such as levothyroxine for hypothyroidism and progesterone supplementation for luteal phase deficiency. Antithrombotic therapy (low-dose aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin) was prescribed for patients with thrombophilic disorders. Lifestyle modifications, including dietary counseling, smoking cessation, and weight management, were advised.

 

Participants were followed for 12 months, with pregnancy outcomes recorded, including conception rates, live birth rates, miscarriage rates, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal outcomes. Follow-ups were conducted monthly during pregnancy and postpartum to monitor maternal and fetal health.

 

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using the independent t-test. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages and analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression analysis was employed to determine significant predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

A total of 150 couples were included in the study. The mean maternal age was 32.5 ± 4.2 years, while the mean paternal age was 35.8 ± 5.1 years. The mean BMI of female participants was 27.4 ± 3.6 kg/m². A history of recurrent pregnancy loss was present in 60% (n=90) of cases, while 40% (n=60) had experienced at least one perinatal death. Underlying medical conditions, such as hypothyroidism (15%), thrombophilia (12%), and polycystic ovary syndrome (10%), were identified in a subset of patients (Table 1).

 

Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population

Parameter

Value (Mean ± SD or n, %)

Maternal age (years)

32.5 ± 4.2

Paternal age (years)

35.8 ± 5.1

Maternal BMI (kg/m²)

27.4 ± 3.6

Recurrent pregnancy loss

90 (60%)

Perinatal death history

60 (40%)

Hypothyroidism

23 (15%)

Thrombophilia

18 (12%)

PCOS

15 (10%)

 

Pregnancy Outcomes

During the follow-up period, 120 (80%) of the couples achieved pregnancy. Of these, 78 (65%) had a live birth, while 30 (25%) experienced another miscarriage, and 12 (10%) had a stillbirth. Preterm delivery occurred in 20% of pregnancies, with an average gestational age at birth of 36.2 ± 2.5 weeks. Neonatal complications, including low birth weight (<2.5 kg) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, were reported in 18% of cases (Table 2).

 

Table 2: Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes

Outcome

Number (%)

Couples achieving pregnancy

120 (80%)

Live births

78 (65%)

Miscarriages

30 (25%)

Stillbirths

12 (10%)

Preterm deliveries

24 (20%)

Neonatal complications

22 (18%)

 

Risk Factors for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

Among the various factors assessed, advanced maternal age (>35 years) was significantly associated with an increased risk of miscarriage (p < 0.01). Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²) and thrombophilic disorders were also significantly linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes (p < 0.05). Couples who underwent medical intervention, such as progesterone supplementation and anticoagulation therapy, had better pregnancy success rates compared to those who did not receive targeted treatment (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

 

Table 3: Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes

Risk Factor

Adverse Outcome (%)

p-Value

Maternal age > 35 years

42 (70%)

<0.01

BMI > 30 kg/m²

30 (50%)

0.03

Thrombophilia

15 (83%)

0.02

Medical intervention

60 (80%) success

0.04

 

The study demonstrated that couples with previous miscarriages and perinatal deaths have a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, targeted medical interventions significantly improved reproductive success. Advanced maternal age, obesity, and thrombophilia emerged as key predictors of poor pregnancy outcomes (Table 3). These findings highlight the need for early identification and personalized management strategies to enhance reproductive performance in this population.

DISCUSSION

The present study evaluated the reproductive performance of couples with a history of miscarriage and perinatal death, identifying key risk factors and assessing the impact of medical interventions. The findings indicate that advanced maternal age, obesity, and thrombophilic disorders significantly contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, targeted medical interventions, including progesterone supplementation and anticoagulant therapy, improved reproductive success.

 

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a multifactorial condition, with genetic, endocrine, immunological, and anatomical factors playing a role in its etiology (1). Previous studies have demonstrated that maternal age is a significant predictor of pregnancy loss, primarily due to an increased prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in oocytes (2,3). In this study, women over 35 years had a significantly higher rate of miscarriage, consistent with prior research indicating a decline in oocyte quality and endometrial receptivity with age (4).

 

Obesity has been identified as a major contributor to pregnancy complications, including miscarriage, gestational diabetes, and hypertensive disorders (5). The present study found that a BMI >30 kg/m² was significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. This aligns with previous research highlighting obesity-related alterations in hormonal balance, insulin resistance, and inflammatory responses that negatively impact implantation and placentation (6,7).

 

Thrombophilic disorders, such as antiphospholipid syndrome and inherited thrombophilias, have been strongly linked to recurrent pregnancy loss (8). The findings of this study indicate a significant association between thrombophilia and pregnancy loss, supporting prior evidence that these conditions lead to placental insufficiency and fetal demise due to microvascular thrombosis (9). The use of low-dose aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin in affected individuals improved live birth rates, which is consistent with existing literature on anticoagulation therapy in pregnancy (10).

 

In terms of perinatal outcomes, preterm birth and neonatal complications were prevalent in this study. A previous meta-analysis reported that women with a history of RPL are at an increased risk of preterm delivery, possibly due to underlying uterine abnormalities, placental dysfunction, or immune-mediated mechanisms (11). Furthermore, fetal growth restriction and low birth weight were common among neonates, reinforcing the importance of close antenatal monitoring in high-risk pregnancies (12).

 

The role of medical interventions in improving pregnancy outcomes was evident in this study. Progesterone supplementation significantly enhanced pregnancy success, which is in agreement with previous research demonstrating its role in maintaining endometrial stability and reducing the risk of miscarriage in women with luteal phase defects (13). Similarly, lifestyle modifications, including weight management and smoking cessation, contributed to better pregnancy outcomes, aligning with findings from public health studies emphasizing the importance of maternal health optimization (14,15).

 

Despite these findings, the study has certain limitations. The sample size was relatively small, and follow-up was limited to one year, which may not fully capture long-term reproductive trends. Additionally, the study was conducted at a single center, limiting the generalizability of the results. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter trials with extended follow-up periods to further validate these findings.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, couples with previous miscarriages and perinatal deaths face a heightened risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Advanced maternal age, obesity, and thrombophilic disorders were identified as significant risk factors. However, targeted interventions, including progesterone supplementation, anticoagulation therapy, and lifestyle modifications, improved pregnancy success. These findings underscore the need for personalized preconception counseling and comprehensive antenatal care to enhance reproductive outcomes in this high-risk population.

REFERENCES
  1. du Fossé NA, van der Hoorn MP, van Lith JMM, le Cessie S, Lashley EELO. Advanced paternal age is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(5):650-669. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa010.
  2. Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
  3. Nguyen BT, Chang EJ, Bendikson KA. Advanced paternal age and the risk of spontaneous abortion: an analysis of the combined 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 National Survey of Family Growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(5):476.e1-476.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.028.
  4. Anthoulakis C, Dagklis T, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A. Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(6):1351-1359. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex084.
  5. Joinau-Zoulovits F, Bertille N, Cohen JF, Khoshnood B. Association between advanced paternal age and congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(9):2113. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa105.
  6. Brandt JS, Cruz Ithier MA, Rosen T, Ashkinadze E. Advanced paternal age, infertility, and reproductive risks: a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(2):81-87. doi: 10.1002/pd.5402.
  7. Patel K, Pirie D, Heazell AEP, Morgan B, Woolner A. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after second-trimester miscarriage or termination for medical/fetal reason: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(3):413-422. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14731.
  8. de la Rochebrochard E, Thonneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1649-56. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.6.1649.
  9. Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Conforti A, Forman E, Canosa S, Innocenti F, Poli M, Hynes J, Gemmell L, Vaiarelli A, Alviggi C, Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A. Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29(5):570-633. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad010.
  10. Lee S, Crowe M, Seow CH, Kotze PG, Kaplan GG, Metcalfe A, Ricciuto A, Benchimol EI, Kuenzig ME. The impact of surgical therapies for inflammatory bowel disease on female fertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7(7):CD012711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012711.pub2.
  11. Davies C, Segre G, Estradé A, Radua J, De Micheli A, Provenzani U, Oliver D, Salazar de Pablo G, Ramella-Cravaro V, Besozzi M, Dazzan P, Miele M, Caputo G, Spallarossa C, Crossland G, Ilyas A, Spada G, Politi P, Murray RM, McGuire P, Fusar-Poli P. Prenatal and perinatal risk and protective factors for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(5):399-410. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30057-2.
  12. Murugesu S, Kasaven LS, Petrie A, Vaseekaran A, Jones BP, Bracewell-Milnes T, Barcroft JF, Grewal KJ, Getreu N, Galazis N, Sorbi F, Saso S, Ben-Nagi J. Does advanced paternal age affect outcomes following assisted reproductive technology? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45(2):283-331. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.031.
  13. Oldereid NB, Wennerholm UB, Pinborg A, Loft A, Laivuori H, Petzold M, Romundstad LB, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C. The effect of paternal factors on perinatal and paediatric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(3):320-389. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy005.
  14. Dviri M, Madjunkova S, Koziarz A, Madjunkov M, Mashiach J, Nekolaichuk E, Trivodaliev K, Al-Asmar N, Moskovtsev SI, Librach C. Is there an association between paternal age and aneuploidy? Evidence from young donor oocyte-derived embryos: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(3):486-500. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa052.
  15. Liu K, Case A; REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY AND INFERTILITY COMMITTEE. Advanced reproductive age and fertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(11):1165-1175. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35087-3.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Evaluating the Effects of Dexmedetomidine vs. Propofol on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
Published: 23/12/2022
Download PDF
Research Article
To Determine the Frequency of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
...
Published: 23/04/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Anatomical Study of Knot of Henry & Plantar Nerves of the Foot
...
Published: 23/04/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Study Of Serum Zinc Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications
...
Published: 23/04/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.