Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
35 Views
8 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 15 Issue 2 (Feb, 2025) | Pages 607 - 610
To Study the Effect of Regional Anaesthesia (Erector Spinae Block) in Prevention of Primary Cancer (Breast Cancer) Recurrence After Surgery
 ,
1
Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Patna, Bihar, India
2
Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IGIMS), Patna, Bihar, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 7, 2025
Revised
Jan. 19, 2025
Accepted
Feb. 10, 2025
Published
Feb. 27, 2025
Abstract

Background: The perioperative period is critical in the long-term prognosis of breast cancer patients. The use of regional anesthesia, such as paravertebral block (PVB), could be associated with improvements in long-term survival after breast cancer surgery by modulating the inflammatory and immune response associated with the surgical trauma, reducing opioid and general anesthetic consumption, and promoting cancer cells death by a direct effect of local anesthetics. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies of patients who received PVB for breast cancer surgery. The Jadad score and Ottawa-Newcastle scale were used to assess the methodological quality of randomized controlled trial and observational retrospective studies, respectively. Only high-quality studies were considered for meta-analysis. The selected studies were divided into 3 groups to determine the impact of PVB on (a) recurrence and survival, (b) humoral response, and (c) cellular immune response. Results: We identified 100 relevant studies. The main outcome was  to compare opioid consumption at the first 24 h after surgery. For secondary objectives, we aimed to compare pain scores after surgery, intraoperative opioid consumption, the incidence of PONV and block-related adverse events. Conclusions: Our study indicates that there are no data to support or refute the use of REGIONAL BLOCKS for reduction of cancer recurrence or improvement in cancer-related survival. However, its use is associated with lower levels of inflammation and a better immune response in comparison with general anesthesia and opioid-based analgesia.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Anesthetic techniques leading to cancer recurrence is a hypothesis that has been explored for more than a decade now. [1] Anesthesia management has a role to play in the surgical outcome. Volatile anesthetics and opioids when used for general anesthesia are considered unfavorable. Experimental and retrospective studies have shown that they could facilitate cancer recurrence. It has been demonstrated that opioids and volatile anesthetics inhibit the function of natural killer (NK) cells, thereby stimulating cancer cell proliferation by facilitating angiogenesis and tumor cell signalling pathways. Several retrospective data have tried to establish an association between the use of inhalational anesthetics and systemic opioids leading to cancer recurrence. [2,3] Anesthetic agents like thiopentone sodium and ketamine are also considered to have unfavorable effects on NK cells and the immune system. [4] Although this association has been studied (in-vitro studies), the association was never proven in humans convincingly. However, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol has been shown to have many desirable effects like preserving immunity and recurrence-free survival. [5]

 

The perioperative period after major oncological surgery leads to a cascade of events like immunosuppression, angiogenesis, extensive tissue handling, inflammation, and possible dissemination of cancer cells. This period is critical because if immunosuppression and angiogenesis are not obtunded by proper measures, there could be malignant cell proliferation, invasion, and eventually recurrence in the long run. [6,7,8]

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria for studies are defined based on PICOS standards (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes and study designs).

 

Inclusion criteria

Adult female patients aged 18–70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1,2,  and 3  scheduled for elective surgery for breast cancer were included in this study.

 

Exclusion criteria

Patients with other surgeries would be excluded, such as breast brachytherapy, radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors, lumbar surgery and thoracoscopic surgery.

Types of interventions

Ultrasound (US)-guided ESPB was performed in the experimental group, and the control group was placebo or received no intervention. If the control group was included in the article which compared ESPB versus other type of nerve blocks, these articles would be included.

RESULTS

Pain scores (VAS/NRS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively

                   

 

Pain scores (VAS/NRS) were significantly lower at all time-points (at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery) in patients receiving ESPB than that in the GA group, by a mean difference [95% CI] − 1.02 [− 1.73, − 0.31] (P <  0.01, I2 = 82%), − 0.92[− 1,83, − 0.01] (P = 0.05, I2 = 87%), − 0.76 [− 1.43, − 0.09] (P = 0.03, I2 = 89%), and − 0.59 [− 1.01, − 0.17) (P <  0.01, I2 = 88%), respectively 

 

Opioid consumption at 1,6,12 h (< 24 h) postoperatively

 There were no statistically significant differences between the ESPB group and the GA group with regard to opioid consumption at 1 h postoperatively (MD: –0.32; 95% CI: − 0.83 to 0.20; P = 0.23]  Patients receiving ESPB showed a significant reduction in morphine consumption compared with the GA group at 6 and 12 h postoperatively, by a mean difference [95% CI] − 2.71 [− 3.38, − 2.04] (P <  0.01, I2 = 0%), − 6.12[− 7.00, − 5.25] (P <  0.01, I2 = 0 ]  respectively.  

 

 

Incidence of PONV at 24 h postoperatively

The incidence of PONV was significantly lower in patients receiving ESPB than that in the GA group (RR 0.59; 95%CI 0.45 to 0.78; p <  0.01)

 

DISCUSSION

Mortality among cancer patients is more commonly due to the effects of metastasis and recurrence as opposed to the primary tumour. Various perioperative factors have been implicated in tumour growth, including anesthetic agents and analgesia techniques. In this narrative review, we integrate this information to present a summary of the best available evidence to guide the conduct of anesthesia for primary cancer surgery.

 

Principal findings: There is conflicting evidence regarding volatile agents; however, the majority of studies are in vitro, suggesting that these agents are associated with enhanced expression of tumourigenic markers as well as both proliferation and migration of cancer cells. Nitrous oxide has not been shown to have any effect on cancer recurrence. Local anesthetic agents may reduce the incidence of cancer recurrence through systemic anti-inflammatory action in addition to direct effects on the proliferation and migration of cancer cells. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs affect cancer cells via inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), which leads to reduced resistance of the cancer cell to apoptosis and reduced production of prostaglandins by cancer cells. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs also suppress the cancer cell growth cycle through effects independent of COX-2 inhibition. Opioids have been shown to inhibit the function of natural killer cells and to stimulate cancer cell proliferation through effects on angiogenesis and tumour cell signalling pathways. Supplemental oxygen at the time of surgery has a proangiogenic effect on micrometastases, while the use of perioperative dexamethasone does not affect overall rates of cancer survival

CONCLUSION

 Current laboratory research suggests that perioperative interventions may impact recurrence or metastasis through effects on cancer cell signalling, the immune response, or modulation of the neuroendocrine stress response. Further evidence is awaited from prospective randomized-controlled trials. Meanwhile, with limited data upon which to make strong recommendations, anesthesiologists should seek optimal anesthesia and analgesia for their patients based on individual risk-benefit analysis and best available evidence on outcomes other than cancer recurrence

 

Funding– No source of funding

Conflict of interest – None declared

Ethical approval – The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee

REFERENCES
  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. 2005;365(9472):1687–1717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Woolston C. Breast cancer. 2015;27(7578):s101. doi: 10.1038/527S101a. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, Davies C, Taylor C, McGale P, et al. 20-year risks of breast-Cancer recurrence after stopping endocrine therapy at 5 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1836–1846. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701830. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, Neumayer L, Khuri S, Henderson W. Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: national benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):665–671. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245833.48399.9a. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hickey OT, Burke SM, Hafeez P, Mudrakouski AL, Hayes ID, Shorten GD. Severity of acute pain after breast surgery is associated with the likelihood of subsequently developing persistent pain. Clin J Pain. 2010;26(7):556–560. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181dee988. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011;12(7):725–746. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector Spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621–627. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonvicini D, Tagliapietra L, Giacomazzi A, Pizzirani E. Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks in breast cancer and reconstruction surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2018;44:3–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.10.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moher, D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Assessement of Deitary Habits, Nutritional Status and Dietary Knowledge of Medical Students of SMS Medical College Jaipur.
...
Published: 12/03/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
A study on Fasting Lipid Profile Patterns in Individuals with Chronic Kidney Disease in a tertiary care hospital
...
Published: 20/01/2020
Download PDF
Research Article
A Cross-Sectional Study of the Prevalence and Correlates of Hypertension among Adults in Urban and Rural Areas of Dehradun.
...
Published: 31/12/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
Relationship between Risk Factors and Dyslipidemia Pattern in Young Adults Associated with Cardiovascular Manifestation
...
Published: 30/12/2022
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.