Objective: To analyse Non-Stress Test as a Predictor for High-Risk Pregnancy-In Background of Fetal Color Doppler in Umbilical and Middle Cerebral Artery by means of categorization intofour groups and comparing the prediction of perinatal outcome in high -risk pregnancies. Material and Method : This was a Prospective Observational study conducted on all ‘High Risk Pregnancies’ in Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjainfrom Oct 2020 to Nov 2021. A total of 182 antenatal women with ‘High Risk’patients were recruited. They were examined clinically, and Doppler velocimetry andnon- stress test were performed. The main vessels studied by Doppler were umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery, to study and analyse the indices. The results of Non-Stress testwere interpreted as Reactive and Non-Reactive. Based on the results of Doppler and Non- Stress, the 182 cases were categorized into four groups and interpretation of results was done.Fetal outcome was considered on the basis of.APGAR score and NICU admissions Results: Among the182 cases of high-risk pregnancies, those with a normal Doppler study and a reactive non-stress test had good perinatal outcome. When both were abnormal, there was a higher percentage of adverse out-come as compared to that of either Doppler or NST alone being abnormal or non-reactive. It was observed in this study that Abnornal Doppler study with Reactive non-stress test had relatively bad perinatal outcome as compared to Normal Doppler study with non reactive non stress test.In this study sensitivity and specificity of Doppler was 71% and 73% while that of NST was 69% and 54% respectively for NICU admissions. Conclusion: Color Doppler is comparatively a better in predicting adverse perinatal outcome. However, when both test are abnormal perinatal outcome is definitely poor.NST can be used as an alternative in absence of colour doppler at rural PHCs and CHCs to identify adverse perinatal outcome and timely referral.