Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
172 Views
96 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 13 Issue:4 (, 2023) | Pages 1373 - 1380
A Comparative Study Between Intranasal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Hemodynamic Responses During Endotracheal Intubation
1
1Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, The Oxford medical College, hospital and research center, Banglore 2Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, East point medical College and research center, Banglore 3Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Subbaiah medical college, Shivamogha. 4Associate professor ,Department of Anaesthesiology, East point College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
DOI : 10.5083/ejcm
Received
Oct. 1, 2023
Revised
Nov. 7, 2023
Accepted
Dec. 1, 2023
Published
Dec. 26, 2023
Abstract

Background: In general anaesthesia, hemodynamic alterations during endotracheal intubation are a key issue. This study evaluated the effectiveness of intravenous and intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) in reducing the stress response following larynogoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Material and Method: The study involved 90 persons who were split into two groups: Group DIN (n = 45) and Group DIV (n = 45) in a prospective, randomised, double-blind approach. The DIV group was administered a 0.5 mcg/kg intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (DEX) during a 40-minute period, whereas the DIN group got a 1 mcg/kg intranasal injection of DEX 40 minutes before to induction. The main goal was to compare the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the two groups starting 40 minutes before induction and every 10 minutes until anaesthesia was induced at the moment of intubation. following that, every 1 minute interval was continued until 5 minutes, at 7 and 10 minutes following intubation. Comparisons of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, sedation, and other side effects were the secondary outcomes. Statistica 6.0 and Graph Pad Prism version 5 were used for the statistical analysis. Result: During the trial period, all haemodynamic parameters in both groups remained within 20 percent of their baseline levels. P > 0.05 indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in MAP between the two groups. The DIV group had a substantially greater preoperative sedation score than the DIN group (P = 0.014). Conclusion: The hemodynamic stress reactions to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation can also be reduced by intranasal DEX, similar to IV DEX, without appreciably altering the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the two groups.

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
A Comparative Study of Laryngoscopic View and Cardiovascular Response, with Macintosh, MC Coy and Miller Laryngoscope Blades in Adults Undergoing Elective Orthopaedic Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia
...
Published: 21/12/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
The Role of Inflammatory Markers in Coronary Artery Disease Severity: Insights from a High vs. Low Inflammation Group
...
Published: 20/06/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
Pathological Features of Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Pre-existing Hypertension
...
Published: 20/08/2024
Download PDF
Research Article
Comparative Study of Clinical Severity, Morbidity and Mortality in Patients of Covid-19 With and Without Type2 Diabetes Mellitus
...
Published: 21/12/2024
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.