European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Introduction: The likelihood of survival for patients receiving coronary artery bypass surgery with graft surgery is decreased by incomplete myocardial revascularization. The results of doing several grafts to each significant sick artery region are still unknown. They wanted to see how inserting numerous grafts in each myocardial area (supra-complete revascularization) affected survival and outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting compared to regular territorial grafting (full revascularization). Aims: To investigate and compare the outcomes of total vs. supra complete territorial grafting in terms of intraoperative advantages and drawbacks, post-operative clinical status, 2 D Echocardiography parameters, incidence of any post-operative significant adverse cardiac event, and overall survival. Materials and Methods: The current study was a prospective, non-randomized study. From July 2021 to January 2023, the study was carried out in Cardiothoracic OT, Postcardiac Surgery Recovery Unit, and CTVS OPD I.P.G.M.E&R (University affiliated tertiary care hospital and teaching institution). There were 40 patients in all in this study. Result: ECG findings were found in 19 (95.0%) more individuals in the Complete group than in 18 (90.0%) in the Supra-complete group. Despite the fact that (p=0.5483) it was not statistically significant. The number of re-examinations and the group had a statistically significant link (p <0.0001). Conclusion: We demonstrated a statistically significant distinction between the mean Number of Re Explorations in the complete group and the supra-complete group. The difference between the mean ICU stay in the Supra-complete group and the complete group was statistically significant, as were the differences between the mean 2D echo findings in the Supra-complete group and the complete group.