Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
605 Views
177 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 14 Issue:1 (Jan-Feb, 2024) | Pages 642 - 648
Study of Cystatin C-As an Early Marker of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Guntur Medical College, Guntur
2
Associate Professor , Department of Biochemistry, Guntur Medical College, Guntur.
3
Professor & HOD, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Ongole. Professor & HOD
4
Department of Biochemistry, Guntur Medical College, Guntur
5
Assistant Professor , Government Medical College, Machilipatnam
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Dec. 4, 2023
Revised
Dec. 19, 2023
Accepted
Jan. 1, 2024
Published
Jan. 15, 2024
Abstract

Aim :To Evaluate the Diagnostic Efficiency of Cystatin C As a marker of Early Renal injury in patients of Type 2 Diabetic in comparison with Creatinine. Materials and Methods : 100 proven cases of type 2 Diabetes categorized into 3 groups. Normoalbuminuria (48), microalbuminuria (32) & macroalbuminuria (20). 50 age and sex matched healthy controls. Fasting plasma glucose(FPG), serum Creatinine, serum Cystatin C, urine dipstick analysis for protein, urine albumin, urine creatinine & calculated UACR were estimated. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by Cystatin C concentrations according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) equation and Creatinine eGFR according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). Results : There was raised levels of FPG , serum Creatinine & serum Cystatin C significantly (p<0.01) with increasing duration of Diabetes. The eGFR of Cystatin C was lower than that of Creatinine eGFR in cases but in controls it was more. The calculated sensitivity of Cystatin C eGFR was 91%,specificity was 94% and overall accuracy(OA) was 92% and these results are better than that of Creatinine eGFR with 84% sensitivity ,88% specificity and 85% OA. The eGFR cystatin c showed higher sensitivity, high specificity & higher accuracy than eGFR creatinine in studied diabetic subjects. Cystatin C showed more significant correlation with Cys C e GFR, (r = −0.99, p<0.001) than serum creatinine e GFR ( r= −0.86,p<0.001) in diabetic patients. Conclusion:The results of present study showed Cystatin C was more sensitive than creatinine thereby making se Cystatin.

Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Assessing the Relationship Between Thiazide Use and Syncope Or Fall in Hypertensive Indian Subjects Admitted to the Tertiary Care Hospital
...
Published: 24/05/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Evaluation of Matrix Metalloproteinases-3 As A Possible Biomarker For Oral Sub Mucous Fibrosis
Published: 24/11/2025
Download PDF
Research Article
Correlation Between Electrographic Changes and Troponin I Levels in Patients Presenting with Chest Pain in Emergency Medicine Department of Tertiary Care Centre
...
Published: 16/11/2025
Download PDF
Short Commentary Article
Commentary: Crystalline Precision: The Clinical Impact of Co-Crystal Formulation Differences in Sacubitril/Valsartan for HFrEF
Published: 22/11/2025
Download PDF
Chat on WhatsApp
Copyright © EJCM Publisher. All Rights Reserved.