Introduction: Macrocytosis is common in various clinical settings and it is found in approximately1.7–3.6% of people admitted forcare for any cause. As we know macrocytic anemia are of two types MA and NMMA. Increased Reticulocyte maturation parameters seen in mostly MA and MDS. Aim: Clinicohaematological correlation of various reticulocyte maturation parameters in differential diagnosis of macrocytic anemia. Methods and materials: Prospective study was conducted over 100 samples. The samples were collected and run over 5 part hematology analyzer. Detailed history was obtained from the patients. Full and methodical clinical examination was done in all. Then we look for various RMF. Results: A total of 100 samples (cases -50, controls -50) were studied. In our study we took 50 blood samples of cases in which 05 MDS patients 13 patients with NMMA and 25 patients with MA while 07 DA patients. Out of 13 NMMA patients 09 males and 04 females, out of 05 MDS pt. 04 males and 01 females and in MA 15 males and 10 females. Conclusion: In conclusion it is crucial to differentiate between MA and NMMA. If the iron status, serum cobalamine and folate levels are normal and there is increased value of IRF and MRV the diagnosis of MDS should be considered. In this scenario the diagnosis of non megaloblastic macrocytic anemia is very rare.
Macrocytosis is common in various clinical settings and it is found in approximately1.7–3.6% of people admitted forcare for any cause1-3. Macrocytosis would be seen even in the absence of anemia. Heterogeneous group of disorders acting via various known and unknown processes can lead to macrocytic anemia. Macrocytic anemia can be classified in two pathogenic group.4-5
The automated reticulocyte count measurements increases the precision and accuracy compared with traditional manual counts.8,9 The reticulocyte maturity can assessed, based on the staining intensity of reticulocytes, which is proportional to their RNA content10,11.
In this study, we tested the use of reticulocyte maturation parameters in the screening of macrocytic anemia patients, to distinguish causes associated with ineffective erythropoiesis (MDS and MA) and NMMA .We describe significant differences in immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF),absolute reticulocyte count(ARC)
and mean reticulocyte volume (MRV) values between NMMA and macrocytic anemia due to MDS. These differences were sufficiently clear to provide a reliable screening diagnosis.12
MDS generally display macrocytosis and dyserythropoiesis in a variety of structural abnormalities affecting metabolism, hemoglobin and membrane antigens or even the presence of abnormal mitochondrial deposits13,14.
We have conducted this study in the department of pathology. A two year prospective study was done and a total of 100 blood samples were examined among them 50 samples were control and 50 cases.
The necessary data was collected from patients and their records. Complete information regarding alcohol intake, drug intake, thyroid disorder and other comorbid illness was obtained.
All the samples were processed on 5 part hematology analyzer.
All routine hematological and reticulocyte maturation parameters were extracted in 50 cases of macrocytic anemia, which includes estimating
If the patients showed the features of megaloblastosis like occurrence of hypersegmented neutrophils or macro ovalocytes then bone marrow aspiration and biopsy will be carried out after obtaining the consent. Patients fasting vitamin B12 and folic acid were measured.
Automated reticulocyte analysis : Reticulocyte maturation analysis was performed using five part analyser . This instrument provides the following parameters: absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) percentage, corrected reticulocyte counts (CRC), percentages of maturation fractions according to three classes: low RNA content (RETL), medium RNA content (RETM) and high RNA content (RETH). It also determines: mean reticulocyte volume (MRV), and immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF).
Inclusion criteria: Alladultpatientwithmacrocyticanemia(MCV>100fl).
Exclusion criteria:Immunehemolyticanemia , Afterbloodloss ,Certain drug(like, methotrexate, Phenytoin,Antiretroviralagentsetc),Bloodtransfusion(within30days),Pregnantwoman.
LIMITATION OF STUDY : This study can be only used as screening test to differentiate between various causes of macrocytic anemia. It is not a diagnostic test. The instrument (5 part hematology analyser) is not available at all places and also not cost effective.
A total of 100 samples (cases -50, controls -50) were studied. In our study we took 50 blood samples of cases in which 05 MDS patients ,13 patients with NMMA and 25 patients with MA while 07 DM patients. Out of 13 NMMA patients 09 males and 04 females, out of 05 MDS pt. 04 males and 01 females and in MA 15 males and 10 females. 50 peripheral blood samples were obtained from healthy donar as control.
Table 1: Age wise distribution of cases of Macrocytic Anemia along with control
Age(in years) |
Case |
Control |
||
|
n |
% |
N |
% |
18-30yr |
10 |
28.0% |
17 |
34.0% |
31-40yr |
18 |
28.0% |
17 |
34.0% |
41-50yr |
8 |
16.0% |
3 |
6.0% |
51-60yr |
9 |
18% |
6 |
12% |
>61 yr |
5 |
10% |
7 |
14% |
Total |
50 |
100% |
50 |
100% |
with controls
Sex |
Case |
Control |
||
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
Male |
34 |
68% |
34 |
68% |
Female |
16 |
32% |
16 |
32% |
Total |
50 |
100% |
50 |
100% |
3.Distribution of cases of Macrocytic Anemia according to
Reticulocyte Count
Reticcount(%) |
Case(n=50) |
Control(n=50) |
||
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
0.5-2.5% |
33 |
66% |
50 |
100% |
2.5-10.5% |
17 |
34% |
00 |
00 |
>10.5% |
00 |
0.0% |
00 |
00 |
Total |
50 |
100% |
50 |
100% |
4: Distribution of cases in macrocytic anemia according to
Mean Reticulocyte volume(MRV)
MRV(fl) |
Case(50) |
Control(50) |
||
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage |
<93.1 (fl) |
03 |
06% |
06 |
12% |
93.1-114.8(fl) |
29 |
58% |
44 |
88% |
>114.8(fl) |
18 |
36% |
00 |
00 |
Total |
50 |
100% |
50 |
100% |
Immature Reticulocyte Fraction
IRF(%) |
Case |
Control |
||
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
<1.6(%) |
00 |
00% |
00 |
00 |
1.6-12.1(%) |
17 |
54% |
50 |
100 |
>12.1(%) |
33 |
66% |
00 |
00 |
Total |
50 |
100% |
50 |
100% |
The most common age group affected by macrocytic anemia is middle age (30-40 yrs) group.This study agrees with the result of ‘ A Torres Gomez et al, who also suggest that age were independently associated with macrocytic anemia. In our study males are affected more commonly than females with M:F ratio of 2:1 and agrees with A Torres Gomez et al. In our study hemoglobin in control group ranged from 10.5-15.9 g/dl with mean value 12.7 1.6 and in cases group ranged from 2.3-10.8 with mean value 7.77 2.31.In our study most cases showed moderate to severe degree of anemia. In this study MA having red blood cells showed high mean cell volume than NMMA and it was statistical significant (p < 0.05). These findings are similar to result of ‘A Torres Gomez et al.
In our study mean corpuscular volume (MCV) in case group ranged from 100.3-128.1fl with mean value 113.2 8.2 and in control groups ranged from 80.1- 97.3 fl with mean value 83.1 5.7 . In this study MA having red blood cells showed high mean cell volume than NMMA and it was statistical significant
In conclusion , the differential diagnosis of macrocytic Anemia is a great challenge to clinicians but with the help of maturation parameters ,this can be made easy. The main advantage of maturation parameters in macrocytic anemia is to find out the spectrum of macrocytic anemia and establish the role of reticulocyte maturation parameters in NMMA and MA. It is used as a screening test in macrocytic anemia.We observed in our study that released reticulocytes showed more immature appearance with high MRV and high IRF in MA than NMMA.
In conclusion it is crucial to differentiate between MA and NMMA. For definitive diagnosis of MDS we eventually requires bone marrow aspiration and cytogenetic studies. The biochemical analysis iron status , serum cobalamine and folate levels are normal along with increased value of IRF and MRV which makes diagnosis of macrocytic anemia.
3.Christine A. Moore; Abdullah Adil.et al 2022: evaluation of megaloblastic and non megaloblastic anemia.
9.Chang C. & Kass L. (1997) Clinical significance of immature reticulocyte fraction determined by automated reticulocyte counting. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 108, 69–73.
10.Cappelletti P, Biasioli B, Buttarello M, et al. Mean reticulocyte volume (MCVr): reference intervals and the need for standardization [abstract]. Proceeding of the XIX International Symposium on Technological Innovation in Laboratory Hematology. ISLH. Lab Hematol 2006;12(3)